Wikimore

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been nominated for deletion at

Commons:Deletion requests/Photographs by Akira Fujii

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated contents should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Date ?

Are yo0u sure that "Stargazer and Pegasus F43 ..." is (or will be) Picture of the Day 2027-12-12 ) Uli Elch (talk) 15:40, 27 March 2026 (UTC)

@Uli Elch: Template:Potd/2027-12#12. No clue why, it's just what was posted to the file's page. Personally, I find it a little strange that PotD is being filled up so far in advance, and with such old images. — Huntster (t @ c) 15:47, 27 March 2026 (UTC)

You may be an eligible candidate for the U4C election

Greetings,

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) seeks candidates for the 2026 election. The U4C is the global committee responsible for overseeing enforcement of the Universal Code of Conduct. Elections are held annually, if elected a committee member serves for two years.

This year the U4C requires candidates to hold administrator rights on at least one wiki, which is why you are being contacted as you appear to hold this right. There are other requirements, such as candidates must be at least 18 years old and may not be employed by the Wikimedia Foundation or other related chapters and affiliates. You can find more information in the call for candidates on Meta-wiki. Additionally, the committee's working language is English; some ability to communicate in English is required.

The election opens on 18 May, if you are eligible and interested you have until 10 May to submit your candidacy. There will week between for candidates to answer questions from the community. Voting takes place privately in SecurePoll, successful candidates must receive at least 60% support. More information is available on the 2026 Elections page, including timelines and other candidacy information. If you read over the material and consider yourself qualified, please consider submitting your name to run for the committee. If you think someone else in your community might be interested and qualified, please encourage them to run.

In partnership with the U4C -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 18:30, 28 April 2026 (UTC)

Meet at Wikimania ?

Hi! I wonder if you're at Wikimania right now? I would love to meet you IRL and thank you around a coffee :) vip (talk) 13:21, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

@Don-vip: Hi Don! Sadly, my health no longer permits me to travel. I do hope you have a great time and some great discussions there! — Huntster (t @ c) 13:24, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

Hi! I'm really sorry to hear that. Things are nice here, we even had the luck to have a welcome greeting from... Sophie Adenot right from the ISS! Take care of yourself, I wish you all the best! vip (talk) 20:27, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

Talk

Hey @Huntster, I want to know the reason for redirecting File:Hubble Spies One-Sided Spiral (NGC 4654).jpg to File:One-sided spiral (potm2607a).jpg. Abdullah1099 (talk) 08:54, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

@Abdullah1099: File:Hubble Spies One-Sided Spiral (NGC 4654).jpg was lower resolution but otherwise identical. — Huntster (t @ c) 13:11, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

Ok, But i think the source and credit and other think are different and are licensed differently. So, probably it is not the same thing overall. Sorry, but i don't have very good knowledge on copyright Abdullah1099 (talk) 13:38, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

@Abdullah1099: That part is irrelevant. The existing file had a valid license and source. Duplicates having different data can still be deleted. We don't keep multiple copies of a file just because they come from different sources. — Huntster (t @ c) 13:44, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

Then why same image from ESA and Flickr of Hubble and Webb are kept while not NASA ones. Abdullah1099 (talk) 13:50, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

@Abdullah1099: I'm not sure what you mean. Link the two images? — Huntster (t @ c) 14:02, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

For example, File:NASA Webb, Hubble Reveal History of Relic of Milky Way’s Formation - Flickr - NASA Hubble.jpg is same as File:Bulge fossil fragment Terzan 5 (Webb and Hubble image) (weic2611a).jpg Abdullah1099 (talk) 14:06, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

@Abdullah1099: I'm so confused. You're asking about images totally unrelated to the ones you initially mentioned. I'm not omniscient; I don't have a magical ability to know all duplicate images on the site. I happened to notice that one you uploaded was a duplicate and dealt with it. These others simply haven't been noticed yet. Read COM:Dupe for more information on how duplicates are handled. — Huntster (t @ c) 14:12, 29 July 2026 (UTC)