User talk:Entbert

Tonnenhof Stralsund

Moin Entbert, mit der von Dir angelegten Category:Tonnenhof Stralsund kann ich mich nicht so richtig anfreunden. Gemäß Organigramm des WSA Ostsee heißt diese Liegenschaft Bauhof Stralsund. Gruß --Ein Dahmer (talk) 08:16, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

Hallo Ein Dahmer, ich habe mich nur an ein paar existierenden Kategorien orientiert. Ich wollte einfach eine Kategorie für Tonnenhöfe erstellen, der Name spielt für mich keine Rolle. Wenn es einen Namen gibt, der besser passt, kann die Kategorie gern umbenannt werden. Das betrifft dann evtl. auch Category:Tonnenhof Hohe Düne, die ich auch gestern angelegt habe. --Entbert (talk) 08:49, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Moin Entbert, ich beziehe mich da auf Category names. Gruß --Ein Dahmer (talk) 09:31, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Du kannst die gern umbenennen. Mir ist der Name wirklich völlig egal. :) Wenn ich Commons-Kategorien anlege, dann tue ich das in der Regel, weil ich Ordnung reinbringen möchte. Über den Namen mache ich mir ehrlich gesagt meistens nicht allzu viele Gedanken, weil man ihn ja noch ändern kann, wenn erstmal die Struktur da ist. Grüße --Entbert (talk) 09:43, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Oki doki! --Ein Dahmer (talk) 16:49, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

File:Urdd Gobaith Cymru Logo.svg

File:Urdd Gobaith Cymru Logo.svg has been nominated for deletion at
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Urdd Gobaith Cymru Logo.svg

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Sahaib3005 (talk) 07:20, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

File:Niklas Nienaß Güstrow 2018-02-24.png

File:Niklas Nienaß Güstrow 2018-02-24.png has been nominated for deletion at
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Niklas Nienaß Güstrow 2018-02-24.png

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

— Dudek1337 (talk) 00:19, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!


2022 Picture of the Year: Saint John Church of Sohrol in Iran.

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2022 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the seventeenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the two most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2021 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:15, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Bearbeitungstool für .svg-Dateien

Hallo Entbert,

ich wollte dich fragen, mit welchem Bildbearbeitungstool du die .svg-Datei zur Zusammensetzung des deutschen Bundesrates

bearbeitest. Danke dir schon einmal im Voraus. Gruß SdHb (talk) 12:04, 4 July 2023 (UTC)

Karte der Balearen

Hallo Entbert,

ich beziehe mich auf https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/c7/Balearic_Islands_map-de.svg. Palma heißt seit 2016 offiziell nur "Palma", das "de Mallorca" ist entfallen. Wäre nett, wenn du das ändern könntest. L.G. Robert Loos (talk) 14:30, 28 January 2024 (UTC)

Landesregierung (Deutschland)

Hallo Guten Tag, ich wollte mal fragen, ob Sie das Bild des Landesregierung (Deutschland) neu erstellen können. Denn seit 18. Januar 2024 regiert jetzt in Hessen schwarz-rot.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen Fishandchipsisyummy (talk) 10:23, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

October 2024: Update of File FDP Landtage

Can you update that file ? FDP is no longer part in Landtag of Bavaria (Bayern) and Thuringia (Thüringen). thumb|right|FDP Landtage --88.70.223.190 09:10, 25 September 2024 (UTC)

October 2024: Update of File:Grüne Landtage.svg

Can you update that file ? Greens is no longer part in Landtag of Brandenburg and Thuringia (Thüringen) . thumb|right|Gründe Landtage --88.70.223.190 09:43, 25 September 2024 (UTC)

and in Hesse Green party is no longer part of goverment. --88.70.223.190 21:41, 25 September 2024 (UTC)

File:Karlsruhe Daxlanden Kirchplatz tram stop 2024-12-01 02.jpg

Hallo Entbert, falls du zufällig von diesem Bild eine vertikale Version mit komplettem Kirchturm gemacht haben solltest, dann wäre die hervorragend für die de:Liste der Kulturdenkmale in Karlsruhe-Daxlanden geeignet. Gruß Sitacuisses (talk) 00:30, 3 December 2024 (UTC)

Hallo Sitacuisses, ich habe leider keine weiteren Fotos gemacht. Ich wäre gar nicht auf die Idee gekommen, dass eine Kirche in Karlsruhe noch kein Foto bei Wikipedia hat. Entbert (talk) 15:50, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
Daxlanden liegt halt weit draußen am Rand und man muss dort schon hinwollen. Alle bisherigen Fotos zeigen die Kirche nur abgeschnitten, weitere Kirchen und sonstige Kulturdenkmale im Stadtteil sind ganz ohne Bild. --Sitacuisses (talk) 16:16, 4 December 2024 (UTC)

Autopatrol given

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. GPSLeo (talk) 17:18, 13 April 2025 (UTC)

Photographs of Lübeck by Willy Pragher

Moin,

gerade habe ich Deine Commonscat|Photographs of Lübeck by Willy Pragher

Und jetzt erdreiste ich mich Dich mit einem Vorschlag zu einer Änderung des Themas zu bewegen...Vor Jahren erschuf ich für die lübeckischen Fotografen eine Category:Lübecker Fotografen die, weil sich schließlich nur Englischsprachige dafür interessieren, in Category:Photographers in Lübeck umgewandelt wurde. Hierunter finden wir die Namen von Fotografen... Unter diesen kann man dann Fachgebiete, wie Lübeck, finden...

Wäre es nicht effektiver, wenn Du die Category in Willy Pragher und unter dieser dann Lübeck, Flensburg, Kiel ... anstatt, wie es derzeit ist, aufzuführen..! 1970gemini (talk) 12:36, 26 August 2025 (UTC)

Moin 1970gemini, ich glaube, ich verstehe dein Anliegen nicht ganz. Eine Category:Willy Pragher gibt es doch schon? Weil wir über 100.000 Fotos von Pragher haben, habe ich sie der Übersichtlichkeit halber weiter nach Aufnahmeort kategorisiert. Zu finden sind die Unterkategorien unter Category:Photographs by Willy Pragher by country. Lübeck und Kiel haben bereits ihre eigene Unterkategorie, für Flensburg könnte man ggf. eine anlegen. --Entbert (talk) 15:06, 26 August 2025 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2025 voting is open!

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you previously voted in the Picture of the Year contest. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favourite images featured on Commons during the last year (2025) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of five images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2025.

Round 2 will end at UTC.

Click here to vote now!

If you have already voted for Round 2, please ignore this message.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:10, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

Announcing the Winners of Picture of the Year 2025!

Hi everyone,

Wikimedia Commons is pleased to finally announce the winners of this year's Picture of the Year 2025 contest! We had some truly incredible finalists to choose from, but the community has spoken.

Here are your top three winning images:

You can view the full results and see where all your favorite images placed here: Full 2025 Results

I also want to highlight what an incredible turnout we had. In the second round, we saw a massive jump in both the number of users voting and the total votes cast. We had exactly 13,979 votes cast by 3,509 users! To put that in perspective, last year we had 7,403 votes from 2,837 users. It is amazing to see that level of growth and community engagement.

Thank you to everyone who voted, helped organize, and generally made the contest such a huge success this year!

Regards,
ZI Jony
For the POTY Committee 20:08, 9 May 2026 (UTC)