User talk:XRay

This is a Wikimedia Commons user talk page.

This is not an article, file or the talk page of an article or file. If you find this page on any site other than the Wikimedia Commons you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user to whom this talk page belongs may have no personal affiliation with any site other than the Wikimedia Commons itself. The original page is located at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:XRay.

This is the user talk page of XRay, where you can send messages and comments to XRay.

  • Be polite.
  • Be friendly.
  • Assume good faith.
  • No personal attacks.
  • Please sign and date your entries by clicking on the appropriate button or by typing four tildes (~~~~) at the end.
  • Put new text under old text.
  • New to Wikimedia Commons? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers as soon as possible.
  • Click here to start a new topic.

Tech News: 2026-19

MediaWiki message delivery 20:40, 4 May 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (05 May 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Merfeld, Merfelder Bruch, Dülmener Wildpferde -- 2026 -- 0833.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 06:18, 2 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Merfeld, Merfelder Bruch, Dülmener Wildpferde -- 2026 -- 0875.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:23, 2 May 2026 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 03:27, 3 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Merfeld, Merfelder Bruch, Dülmener Wildpferde, Fohlen -- 2026 -- 0961.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 06:18, 2 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Merfeld, Merfelder Bruch, Dülmener Wildpferde, Fohlen -- 2026 -- 1009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 06:18, 2 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Merfeld, Merfelder Bruch, Dülmener Wildpferde, Fohlen -- 2026 -- 0941.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 06:18, 2 May 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:43, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (06 May 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Merfeld, Merfelder Bruch, Dülmener Wildpferde -- 2026 -- 0971.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 04:57, 4 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Merfeld, Merfelder Bruch, Dülmener Wildpferde -- 2026 -- 0865.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 04:56, 4 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Buldern, Rapsfeld -- 2026 -- 1051.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 04:56, 4 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Merfeld, Merfelder Bruch, Dülmener Wildpferde -- 2026 -- 0835.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 05:57, 3 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Merfeld, Merfelder Bruch, Dülmener Wildpferde, Stute mit Fohlen -- 2026 -- 0935.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 05:57, 3 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Buldern, Felder -- 2026 -- 0337.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:35, 3 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Buldern, Felder -- 2026 -- 0340.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:37, 3 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Buldern, Rapsfeld -- 2026 -- 1039.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:37, 3 May 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:44, 6 May 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (07 May 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Merfeld, Merfelder Bruch, Dülmener Wildpferde -- 2026 -- 0837.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:55, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Buldern, Rapsfeld -- 2026 -- 1042.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Igor123121 05:01, 4 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Buldern, Rapsfeld -- 2026 -- 1049.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Igor123121 05:01, 4 May 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:43, 7 May 2026 (UTC)

A bit much (from File talk:Norderney, Dünenlandschaft, Wegweiser -- 2025 -- 9437.jpg)

I don't want to seem rude, but on the file page for this photo there is so much text that for an inexperienced viewer it will be almost impossible to find the name of the photographer. Blue Elf (talk) 09:05, 7 May 2026 (UTC)

@Blue Elf: Thanks for the note. First of all, just to let you know: I’ve moved your comment to my talk page, since having it on a file talk page would only cause confusion. I don’t understand why the photographer’s name isn’t relatively easy to find, since the information block is structured in a fairly consistent way. It’s true, though, that I include a lot of information. I had heard from time to time that there wasn’t enough, so I expanded the text. And everyone wants to see different information grouped together. So it’s not easy to decide what to include, how, and where. Unfortunately, I haven’t found a truly elegant solution yet. -- XRay 💬 12:26, 7 May 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (08 May 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Merfeld, Merfelder Bruch, Dülmener Wildpferde, Fohlen -- 2026 -- 0940.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:15, 6 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Merfeld, Merfelder Bruch, Dülmener Wildpferde -- 2026 -- 0972.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:17, 6 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Merfeld, Merfelder Bruch, Dülmener Wildpferde -- 2026 -- 0955.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:59, 5 May 2026 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --Benjism89 04:59, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Buldern, Rapsfeld -- 2026 -- 1062.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 20:17, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Buldern, Feldweg -- 2026 -- 1064.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 20:17, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Buldern, Rapsfeld -- 2026 -- 1069.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JackyM59 05:44, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:48, 8 May 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (09 May 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Buldern, Felder -- 2026 -- 0344.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:38, 7 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Merfeld, Merfelder Bruch, Dülmener Wildpferde, Stute mit Fohlen -- 2026 -- 1025.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:39, 7 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Buldern, Rapsfeld -- 2026 -- 0341.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:29, 6 May 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 9 May 2026 (UTC)

Announcing the Winners of Picture of the Year 2025!

Hi everyone,

Wikimedia Commons is pleased to finally announce the winners of this year's Picture of the Year 2025 contest! We had some truly incredible finalists to choose from, but the community has spoken.

Here are your top three winning images:

You can view the full results and see where all your favorite images placed here: Full 2025 Results

I also want to highlight what an incredible turnout we had. In the second round, we saw a massive jump in both the number of users voting and the total votes cast. We had exactly 13,979 votes cast by 3,509 users! To put that in perspective, last year we had 7,403 votes from 2,837 users. It is amazing to see that level of growth and community engagement.

Thank you to everyone who voted, helped organize, and generally made the contest such a huge success this year!

Regards,
ZI Jony
For the POTY Committee 20:10, 9 May 2026 (UTC)

Tech News: 2026-20

MediaWiki message delivery 19:18, 11 May 2026 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Dülmen, Merfeld, Merfelder Bruch, Dülmener Wildpferde -- 2026 -- 0972.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dülmen, Merfeld, Merfelder Bruch, Dülmener Wildpferde -- 2026 -- 0972.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 13 May 2026 (UTC)

Pattern Appreciation Society

@Frank Schulenburg, Radomianin, Aristeas, and Aciarium: I took Aciarium’s template and turned it into a suitable userbox template: {{User Pattern Appreciation Society}}. I hope Aciarium doesn’t mind. I’ve also created a user interest group. With this enthusiasm, I’m going to explore similar ideas related to creative photography and black-and-white photography. Both are definitely underrated topics. -- XRay 💬 14:09, 15 May 2026 (UTC)

I've create {{User Creative Photography}} too. -- XRay 💬 14:56, 15 May 2026 (UTC)
Many thanks for your work, Dietmar! I thought about the same, but had no time to pursue it, so I am very happy that you have worked out the details and completed both the box and the user category. That’s great! And, of course, many thanks to you, Aciarium for the original idea and for initiating the whole thing, and to Frank and Radomianin for their inspiring input. In general I try to restrict the user boxes on my user page as far as possible, but your joint effort has produced such a nice user box that I have to add it to my page. Thank you again and all the best, – Aristeas (talk) 16:32, 15 May 2026 (UTC)
  • Many thanks as well, XRay, for putting so much work into this and turning the original idea into an actual userbox and user group. I also ended up adding the userbox to my page, even though - much like Aristeas - I am usually very selective and restrained when it comes to userboxes. Perhaps a slightly more minimal or symbolic icon could eventually be found one day, but for us "founders" the current version already has a rather special charm, since the pattern shown is the very photograph whose nomination started this whole idea :) -- Radomianin (talk) 18:05, 15 May 2026 (UTC)
@XRay: I don't mind at all, quite the opposite! Thank you for turning my "design concept" into a proper, working userbox template (which I promptly added to my page). I was aiming for something like that myself, but couldn't find the time to get acquainted with the technical background of userbox templates. I appreciate it very much!
@Frank Schulenburg, Radomianin, and Aristeas: Also, I find it really exciting to see how quickly a simple joke in an FP comment section gained traction and led to the actual creation of a (yet) small, but very enthusiastic pattern-photography user group. It's always great to see other people sharing one's interests and taste, and I am looking forward to many more discussions under pattern nominations on FP!
Beste Grüße, Aciarium ⚒ (talk) 19:02, 15 May 2026 (UTC)
It looks like a simple idea, maybe even a bit of fun. I see it as a way to foster creative ideas and enhance the diversity of photographic possibilities. To be honest, these aspects are often overlooked here on Commons. Too many photos are merely shots of objects. That’s not to say they can’t be great photos—as many featured photos demonstrate. I’ve had to engage in discussions far too often regarding black-and-white photography or intentional camera movement. Even with black-and-white photography, too many people aren’t aware that there are many possibilities and that it’s not just a simple click of a button. In that sense, enthusiasm for pattern is a very good sign that people value creative photography.-- XRay 💬 19:13, 15 May 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (18 May 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmen, Merfeld, Merfelder Bruch, Dülmener Wildpferde -- 2026 -- 0948 (bw).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 13:03, 15 May 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 18 May 2026 (UTC)

Category:Noindexed user pages