Dag Husky. Vandaag werd deze deze foto geupload die oa zonder licentie op commons nu staat. Ik diende een verwijderverzoek in daarom. De uploader reageerde zojuist daarop op mijn overlegpagina. Zou je de uploader behulpzaam kunnen zijn in al de adminstratieve handelingen die moeten gebeuren? Mvg Sonty (talk) 15:34, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated contents should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Hi again, When I wrote the above message I was under impression you ware the uploader of the image. I apologize for my confusion. --Jarekt (talk) 02:54, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!
If you created this user page, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Hi Hay. Are you the owner of the "glamwiki" channel on YouTube? I was asking around a little while ago trying to find out who has the password so that we can start using that channel for GLAM-Wiki videos, and Multichill pointed me your way. Could you share the password with me if you have it? Thanks! Dominic (talk) 16:18, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
I don't mean to pester you, but I'd like to be able to have this to upload content this week, if possible. Can you get back to me? Thanks! Dominic (talk) 20:02, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.
Dear Wikimedians,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.
I noticed this bot in recent changes/unpatrolled. 3500 edits without a flag seems a bit off, so I've temporarily blocked the account. I've asked about this on Commons:Bureaucrats' noticeboard#User:HuskeyBot as well. INeverCry 17:29, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
Thanks. I've added something to the discussion on the noticeboard. Husky(talk to me) 18:26, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results:
We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).
In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)
We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:
We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.
Thanks, the Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.
Hello Husky, your bot is adding a Nationaal Archief template and is removing the Images from Anefo category. If an image is from Nationaal Archief, it does not necessarily mean the image is from Anefo. The image could also be from elsewhere. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 09:03, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
Unfortunately the template name is a little bit confusing. I guess something like {Nationaal Archief - Anefo} would have made more sense. Husky(talk to me) 12:24, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Confusing it is. It is not a good idea to manage the categories through templates. In this case it shows, but for new contributors it is downright incomprehensible. It makes contributing to Wikipedia a mess. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 12:35, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Oh yes, i completely agree that it's confusing. However, there are good reasons why you want to add the categories using the template. For example, if you ever want to change the category on all of these images you only need to edit in in one place (the template). Otherwise, you need to run a bot through the complete collection to change it. Husky(talk to me) 12:37, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Even that advantage does not outweigh the disadvantage, I think. Anyway, it's better to rename one of the templates, to at least shed some light on it. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 12:53, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
I'll add that to my todo list (the renaming). Unfortunately, renaming a template involves editing all pages that already have it:(. Husky(talk to me) 12:55, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Well, it goes to show: ieder voordeel heb zijn nadeel. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 13:09, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
example of a template change that puts the file into the "contributed by KB" category, though they didn't actively contribute it
Hmm, I saw that this now is in the category "media contributed by KB" as well as "images from KB", but I think only the ones that they actively contributed themselves should be in the "contributed by" category. Thpughts? Jane023 (talk) 09:50, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
Hey Jane, yes you're right. I was rearranging the categories, and it's less work to throw everything together and rearrange later than to go through all the files individually. I'll sort it out! Husky(talk to me) 13:31, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
OK sounds like a big job - good luck with it! Jane023 (talk) 12:54, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.
Beste Husky, ik kwam foto tegen van Corinne Kruger: File:Corinne-kruger-1427711918.jpg.
De foto is kennelijk gemaakt door Lars Mennen en door jou upgeload vanaf Wikiportret en voorzien van datering 30 maart 2015.
Die datum kan niet kloppen, gezien het overleden zijn van Kruger, een nogal vervelende onjuistheid, mijns inziens.
Volgens de "verborgen" metadata zou de foto met Photoshop zijn gedigitaliseerd op 23 feb 2009. Als dat klopt is de foto niet later dan die datum gemaakt, maar zou wel eerder kunnen zijn gemaakt.
Met vriendelijke groet , --Paulbe (talk) 09:45, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated contents should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Thanks for uploading File:Tom kok.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).
The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Tom kok.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.
File:Beerbottle dezeezuiper.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise,everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
File:Beerbottle troubadour.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise,everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
File:Beerbottle liefmans abdis.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise,everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
In het verleden heb je één of meerdere presentaties geüpload naar de verenigingswiki van Wikimedia Nederland. Wij zouden deze graag toevoegen aan ons presentatiearchief op Wikimedia Commons. Er is echter geen licentieinformatie opgegeven bij de oorspronkelijke upload(s) naar de verenigingswiki waardoor het niet mogelijk is de upload over te zetten met Commonshelper. Daarom zouden we je willen vragen of je de presentaties zelf alsnog zou willen uploaden naar Wikimedia Commons, en ze in Category:Wikimedia Nederland presentations zou willen plaatsen. Hartelijk dank!
Met vriendelijke groet, --AWossink (talk) 10:51, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Hee Arne. Om welke presentaties gaat het? Husky(talk to me) 10:52, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Dag Arne, ik heb ze allemaal geupload op Commons (onder iets meer beschrijvende namen). De enige waar ik dat niet bij heb gedaan is de Wiki Loves Art presentatie (deze). Die heb ik niet zelf gemaakt, en ik heb het idee dat de afbeeldingen daarin ook niet allemaal CC-BY-SA zijn. Risico neem ik dan liever niet om het op Commons te zetten. Husky(talk to me) 22:00, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
Begrijpelijk! In ieder geval heel erg bedankt voor het uploaden van de andere presentaties! Dat maakt ons archief hier weer een stuk beter! Groet, --AWossink (talk) 11:36, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
Rietveld_Schr%C3%B6derhuis
Dear Husky,
I am a Prof. in Architectureand I am currently redacting a book titled “History of Interior Design and Furniture” and it will be published in Turkish edition. I would like to use your image from https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rietveld_Schr%C3%B6derhuis. At the end of the book, the name of the beholder of the image is noted in ‘Picture Credits.’ Do you prefer us to use your nick name in Wikipedia, or we can use your proper name if you prefer.
Best regards,
Mustafa Demirkan
mustafaemindemirkan@gmail.com
--hippofish 19:54, 13 July 2017 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Serhatakbak (talk•contribs) 19:54, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
I send you an e-mail! Husky(talk to me) 08:17, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
hi, nice uploads. i may be converting some of your metadata to artwork template, i.e.
Thanks! And you're welcome to convert my uploads to {artwork} of course. Husky(talk to me) 13:35, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Brug 213
Je raadt het nooit, maar ik had je foto "Dijksgracht street end.jpg" nodig. Waarom heb je deze oerlelijke brug (wist je wel dat het een brug was?) gefotografeerd? In ieder geval dank daarvoor!,Ceescamel (talk) 14:47, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Dag Cees, wat leuk zeg. Ik wist wel dat het een brug was, maar niet dat het ding ook nog een nummer had. Ik heb toen een hele serie foto's van de Dijksgracht gemaakt, en deze zat er toevallig tussen. Waarom heb jij 'm nodig? Husky(talk to me) 08:59, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
Uiteraard voor de/een serie over bruggen (dus op naar 214) in Amsterdam. En daarmaa ook een inkijkje in de geschiedenis van Amsterdam. Het leuke is dan dat ik van deze brug, waarvan bijna niemand het bestaan weet een foto vond, terwijl van bruggen in de binnenstad waar iedereen over heen loopt soms nauwelijks een recente foto is.Ceescamel (talk) 10:05, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
Als je verzoekjes hebt wil ik best een keer een foto in de binnenstand voor je maken. Husky(talk to me) 09:24, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Commons bot inactivity
Hello!
Your bot has been listed at Commons:Bots/Requests/de-flag 5 as being inactive for over two years. As a housekeeping measure we'd like to remove the bot flag from inactive bot accounts, unless you expect the bot will be operated again in the near future. If you wish for your bot to retain it's bot flag, please speak up on the deflag page. If you consent to the removal of the bot flag (or do not reply on the deflag page) you can re-request the bot flag at Commons:Bots/Requests should you need it again. Regards, ~riley(talk) 22:37, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
Expiry of GWToolset user group memberships
There is a proposal on the Bureaucrat's noticeboard to automatically expire GWT memberships after one year unless the user requests an extension. Please add your views and suggestions to the discussion. The reasonably informal process for getting access to GWT access will remain as is.
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated contents should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Yours sincerely, Fæ (talk) 20:14, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
File copyright status
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons. While everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the project, one or more of your recent file uploads had missing or false information regarding its source and copyright status. Please note that Wikimedia Commons takes copyright rules and infringement very seriously. Files may only be uploaded and included if their copyright status meets the conditions stated in our licensing policy, and if their provenance is clearly documented. Files that fail to meet those conditions may be deleted, and users who fail to meet them may be blocked. Please follow our first steps, if you haven't already. If you have questions, feel free to ask at the Village Pump copyright question page or on my talk page. Thank you.
— Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 16:45, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
@Jeff G.: , i'm not quite sure to which 'recent file uploads' you are referring to. As you might have seen from my user page, i've been a Commons user for quite a while so i'm pretty well aware of the rules considering copyright violations. Maybe you could be a bit more specific? Cheers. Husky(talk to me) 21:09, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Hallo Husky, zonet zag ik dat deze niet meer bestaat. Misschien wil je het gaatje wel opvullen hiermee? Lotje (talk) 16:32, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
@Lotje: , hee wat gek. Die afbeelding is blijkbaar verwijderd, maar het is mij volstrekt onduidelijk waarom. Ik kan 'm niet vinden in de deletion logs, en er is ook geen deletion request aangemaakt. Husky(talk to me) 16:39, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
Wat jammer nou! Lotje (talk) 16:40, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
Ik zie als moderator geen logs of deleted versions onder die filenaam? Ciell (talk) 18:06, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
Een rename zonder redirect is toch ook mogelijk? Thanks. Lotje (talk) 13:08, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
Dan zou ik als Commons moderator het eigenlijk nog wel in het logboek moeten zien, maar er is helemaal geen logboek onder die naam... Ciell (talk) 19:02, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
Andere mogelijkheid: Husky (of iemand anders) maakte nooit het bestand aan.:-) Lotje (talk) 06:52, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.
If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!
Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 06:50, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Husky; jij bouwt gevaarlijke bruggen. Aan de ene kant op water invaren en aan de andere kant alleen maar land.:-) Het zijn twee aparte bruggen. Links is 962, waarvan binnenkort een artikel en dan zal ik ook de foto hernoemen.Ceescamel (talk) 14:29, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Brug 432brug 432
Goed gespot! Ik zie dat ik het in de beschrijving wel duidelijk heb gemaakt dat het niet om die brug gaat, maar in de bestandsnaam is dat inderdaad niet zo heel handig. Ik kon destijds denk ik niet vinden dat het viaduct zelf ook een brugnummer had, maar dat weet jij natuurlijk beter dan ik. Dank! Husky(talk to me) 14:45, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Depictor stats
Hello! Roughly how many images are processed with Depictor daily? Thanks! EpicPupper (talk) 13:50, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
@EpicPupper: Great question! I've crunched a couple of numbers and i've got this:
Total number of images processed since August 24th 2021: around 410.000. So that would be about 1.600 a day, but edits have slowed down since the beginning. Here's a table with processed images per month for all 'completed' months:
Month
Processed images
Sep 2021
92436
Oct 2021
91016
Nov 2021
81771
Dec 2021
15896
Jan 2022
27887
Feb 2022
24954
Mar 2022
39983
Apr 2022
13744
So for April it's more like 460 per day. Still quite a lot of images that are being processed! Husky(talk to me) 22:05, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
Missing permission
Hello. Before to ask you my question, sorry for my bad english, it's not my native language. I saw on this page https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Waterice1.jpg that the file was free to use on april 2007. Now the link to the Flickr account shows that the picture was removed. So the licence could change. Do you have an actual permission of the photograph to use it? Did the author of the picture give you a written document that allows you to publish his work on Commons? Awaiting your reply, thanks. Olga Rithme (talk) 21:35, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Hello again. Having received no response from you, I will request the deletion of the file. I don't know if there is an official way to warn you, so I do it in this message. Not having permission from the author to post and use his picture is reason for removal on Commons, which is why I'm going to request removal. Wishing you a good continuation. Olga Rithme (talk) 16:47, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Hey Olga. I've added a comment on the Deletion request page. The picture was uploaded and reviewed to have a correct license at the time. I'm not sure why you think we need permission. See User:FlickreviewR. Husky(talk to me) 11:57, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated contents should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.
This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.
The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.
Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.
Hee Maarten. Zeker. 'Show advanced options' --> Commons category en dan kun je een categorie aangeven met diepte (gebruikt Petscan in de achtergrond). Husky(talk to me) 13:01, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Dear License reviewer,This is to inform you that a new page, Commons:Permission requests, has been created to centralize and manage requests for permission to external sources. The page is intended to help streamline the review process by providing a dedicated space where users can submit and track their permission requests.You may wish to visit the page to familiarize yourself with its purpose and format, and to monitor any new submissions that may require your attention. By default, license reviewers may process requests on the page. Any questions may be directed at Commons talk:Permission requests.Thank you for your continued work in ensuring proper license compliance across Commons.
On November 12, temporary accounts will be enabled on Commons. The IP of unregistered users will then be hidden for most users. You, as a patroller or license reviewer, are eligible to request the new temporary account IP viewer right, if you need it to continue fighting vandalism and abuse on Commons. If you want to request the right, please file the request here. Please be aware that you also have to accept the Wikimedia Access to Temporary Account IP Addresses Policy in your preferences. For more information about temporary accounts, look at the project page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:34, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2025 voting is open!
2024 Picture of the Year:Mundari man polishing the horns of one of his Watusi cows using a mixture of cow urine and ash as a ritualistic and protective practice in a temporary cattle camp in Terekeka, South Sudan.
Dear Wikimedian,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2025 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year is the twentieth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favourite images featured on Commons during the last year (2025) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the top 5% of most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just five images to become the Picture of the Year.
Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2025 voting is open!
Dear Wikimedian,
You are receiving this message because we noticed that you previously voted in the Picture of the Year contest. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favourite images featured on Commons during the last year (2025) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of five images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2025.
Announcing the Winners of Picture of the Year 2025!
Hi everyone,
Wikimedia Commons is pleased to finally announce the winners of this year's Picture of the Year 2025 contest! We had some truly incredible finalists to choose from, but the community has spoken.
Here are your top three winning images:
First place: The aftermath of an Israeli airstrike in Gaza City on October 9, 2023, leaving widespread destruction in the Rimal area. Attribution: WAFA (Q2915969) / CC-BY-SA 3.0
Second place: Baby cape fur seal (Arctocephalus pusillus) sleeping at Cape cross, Namibia. Attribution: Giles Laurent / CC-BY-SA 4.0
Third place: A gigantic jet photographed from the International Space Station by astronaut Nichole Ayers. Attribution: public domain
You can view the full results and see where all your favorite images placed here: Full 2025 Results
I also want to highlight what an incredible turnout we had. In the second round, we saw a massive jump in both the number of users voting and the total votes cast. We had exactly 13,979 votes cast by 3,509 users! To put that in perspective, last year we had 7,403 votes from 2,837 users. It is amazing to see that level of growth and community engagement.
Thank you to everyone who voted, helped organize, and generally made the contest such a huge success this year!