User talk:Syntaxys

Welcome to the Commons, Syntaxys!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | asturianu | azərbaycanca | Bahasa Banjar | català | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | Esperanto | euskara | estremeñu | français | Frysk | galego | hrvatski | Bahasa Indonesia | interlingua | Interlingue | íslenska | italiano | Kiswahili | Kurdî | Latina | lietuvių | magyar | Bahasa Melayu | Mirandés | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | occitan | Plattdüütsch | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | rumantsch | Scots | shqip | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | Basa Sunda | suomi | svenska | Tagalog | Türkçe | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | Ирон | македонски | нохчийн | русский | српски / srpski | тоҷикӣ | українська | ქართული | Հայերեն | नेपाली | भोजपुरी | मराठी | हिन्दी | অসমীয়া | বাংলা | தமிழ் | മലയാളം | සිංහල | ไทย | ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး  | မြန်မာဘာသာ | 한국어 | 日本語 | 中文 | 中文(台灣)‎ | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 粵語 | עברית | اردو | العربية | تۆرکجه | سنڌي | فارسی | +/−
First steps tutorial

Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy.

Getting help

More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.

Goodies, tips and tricks
  • Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities.
  • All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery
  • Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~
  • Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!)
  • To link to an image page, write this: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], it makes this: Image:Foo.jpg
  • If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper
Made a mistake?
  • Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}}
  • For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)
SieBot 08:22, 4 August 2007 (UTC)


Quality Image Promotion (01 May 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2025-06-13 G11-IMG0039 Achim-Lammerts LSG-Erlenbachwiesen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:08, 29 April 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 1 May 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (04 May 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2026-04-26 Z5-6350 Achim-Lammerts Empis-stercorea.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 12:56, 1 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2026-04-26 Z5-6450 Achim-Lammerts Empis-stercorea.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 12:56, 1 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2025-11-01 D500-1485 Achim-Lammerts Oudemansiella-mucida.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 12:56, 1 May 2026 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --Tooki 21:12, 1 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2025-11-01 D500-1475 Achim-Lammerts Oudemansiella-mucida.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 12:56, 1 May 2026 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --Tooki 21:12, 1 May 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 4 May 2026 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:2025-11-01 D500-1475 Achim-Lammerts Oudemansiella-mucida.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2025-11-01 D500-1475 Achim-Lammerts Oudemansiella-mucida.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:06, 4 May 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (05 May 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2026-04-12 Z5-4858 Achim-Lammerts Karlsruhe-Rheinhafen-Dampfkraftwerk-Windmühlenberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 22:09, 2 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2026-04-16 Z5-4905 Achim-Lammerts Karlsruhe Unnamed-work-Per-Kirkeby.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JackyM59 13:51, 2 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2026-04-12 Z5-4857 Achim-Lammerts Karlsruhe-Brunnen-Elsässer-Platz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JackyM59 13:51, 2 May 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (06 May 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2026-04-26 Z5-7050E Achim-Lammerts Lamium-purpureum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:12, 4 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2025-06-24 G11-0068 Achim-Lammerts Neupotz-Rheinzabern.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 09:43, 3 May 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:44, 6 May 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (07 May 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2026-04-26 Z5-7300E Achim-Lammerts Veronica-chamaedrys.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plasmium 15:29, 4 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2026-04-26 Z5-6700E Achim-Lammerts Potentilla-indica.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 16:42, 4 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2025-07-13 GX6-100447 Achim-Lammerts Kandel-Bienwald.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
CA / purple halos in the sky --Plozessor 03:24, 4 May 2026 (UTC)
Fixed, thanks for the review. --Syntaxys 07:54, 4 May 2026 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:39, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2026-04-12 Z5-4854 Achim-Lammerts Karlsruhe-Bücherschrank-Elsässer-Platz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Georgfotoart 20:53, 4 May 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:48, 7 May 2026 (UTC)

Vermutete Fehlbestimmung beim Bild File:2026-04-26_Z5-6700E_Achim-Lammerts_Potentilla-indica.jpg

Hallo Syntaxys, ich habe wegen der auffälligen und eigentlich unverwechselbaren Außenkelchblätter in File:2026-04-26 Z5-6700E Achim-Lammerts Potentilla-indica.jpg den dringenden Verdacht, dass das in Wirklichkeit die Indische Scheinerdbeere (Potentilla indica) ist und keinesfalls die Echte Nelkenwurz (Geum urbanum), bei der so etwas nicht zu erwarten ist. War das eine am Boden entlangkriechende kleine Pflanze mit erdbeerartigen Blättern? Die Nähe des großen Blatts zur Blüte würde dazu auch passen. Falls das so war, dann sollte bei dem Bild die Bestimmung berichtigt werden, inklusive des Dateinamens. Mit freundlichen Grüßen --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 11:36, 7 May 2026 (UTC)

Danke für den Hinweis, aber es ist sicher Geum urbanum. Die Pflanze war so gewachsen, wie es in der Zeichnung dargestellt ist und hatte eine Höhe von gut 25-30 cm. Ich kann aber nochmal genau nachsehen, der Standort ist in der Nähe. Achim Lammerts • Syntaxys (talk) 14:44, 7 May 2026 (UTC)
Das wäre für Potentilla indica tatsächlich etwas üppig. Allerdings vermerkt de:Scheinerdbeere eine Wuchshöhe von 10 bis 30 cm, so dass die Höhe schon passen könnte. Geum urbanum ist in der Regel höher, laut de:Echte Nelkenwurz 30 bis 120 cm hoch. Außerdem ist der Außenkelch eben sehr typisch und passt leider gar nicht zu Geum urbanum, sehr wohl aber zu Potentilla indica. Ein Bild, auf dem etwas mehr von der Pflanze zu sehen ist, also optimal eine Habitusaufnahme, wäre aber natürlich sinnvoll. Mit freundlichen Grüßen --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 15:12, 7 May 2026 (UTC)
Ich bin eben beim Einkaufen kurz dort vorbei geradelt und hab noch ein halbwegs scharfes Händibild vom Habitus geschossen. Ich habe die Beobachtung bei iNaturalist damit ergänzt, der Link dazu ist in der Beschreibung. Man erkennt einen langezogenen nach oben wachsenden Stiel.
Ich muss unbedingt morgen früh nochmal hin und das Makro-Setup mitnehmen. Da lauerten 2 Spinnen in ihren Netzen, die Ecke ist voller schöner Motive. Achim Lammerts • Syntaxys (talk) 16:08, 7 May 2026 (UTC)
Das ist völlig eindeutig die Indische Scheinerdbeere. Man sieht den Außenkelch jetzt noch viel besser. Dreiteilige Blätter kann es zwar auch bei der Echten Nelkenwurz geben, vgl. z. B. den Herbarbeleg File:Rosengewächse Nelkenwurz.jpg aber da sollte man dann eigentlich auch die typischen Stängelblätter mit großen Nebenblättern sehen können. Die Nebenblätter sind wohl bei der Scheinerdbeere nicht immer so groß (vgl. die Zeichnung zur Art oben). Ich wette mal, dass die Blätter (nicht die Nebenblätter) alle die üblichen drei Fiedern aufweisen und dass das auch keine Klettfrucht gibt, sondern eine erdbeerartig aussehende Frucht. Dass die Pflanzen im Wald etwas höher sein können als z. B. auf einem Rasen, das ist völlig normal. Mit freundlichen Grüßen --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 20:30, 7 May 2026 (UTC)
Ich bin da auch gespannt und werde das im Fokus behalten, in den nächsten 2-3 Wochen sollten sich ja Fruchtkörper bilden. Im selben Areal habe ich auch echte Wald-Erdbeeren gesehen, jedoch deutlich am Boden bleibend und an helleren Stellen. Achim Lammerts • Syntaxys (talk) 02:03, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
Du hast recht, @Robert Flogaus-Faust, es ist die Scheinerdbeere. Ich war heute Vormittag nochmal dort und hab das Areal weiter abgesucht. Es gibt auch viele Echte Nelkenwurz und die sehen etwas anders aus. Es war jedoch zu windig für gute Makros, ich probiere es die Tage nochmal. Achim Lammerts • Syntaxys (talk) 11:23, 8 May 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (08 May 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2026-04-18 Z5-5350 Achim-Lammerts Fragaria-vesca.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plasmium 08:24, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2026-04-18 Z5-5400 Achim-Lammerts Fragaria-vesca.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 09:07, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2026-04-18 Z5-5300 Achim-Lammerts Stellaria-neglecta.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JackyM59 05:42, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2026-04-23 Z5-5650E Achim-Lammerts Stellaria-holostea.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JackyM59 05:42, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2025-07-13 GX6-100523 Achim-Lammerts Kandel-Bienwald.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plasmium 10:00, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2026-03-22 Z5-2600 Achim-Lammerts Ficaria-verna.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Harlock81 12:38, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2026-04-16 Z5-4902 Achim-Lammerts Karlsruhe Stephaniebrunnen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 18:49, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:53, 8 May 2026 (UTC)

Announcing the Winners of Picture of the Year 2025!

Hi everyone,

Wikimedia Commons is pleased to finally announce the winners of this year's Picture of the Year 2025 contest! We had some truly incredible finalists to choose from, but the community has spoken.

Here are your top three winning images:

You can view the full results and see where all your favorite images placed here: Full 2025 Results

I also want to highlight what an incredible turnout we had. In the second round, we saw a massive jump in both the number of users voting and the total votes cast. We had exactly 13,979 votes cast by 3,509 users! To put that in perspective, last year we had 7,403 votes from 2,837 users. It is amazing to see that level of growth and community engagement.

Thank you to everyone who voted, helped organize, and generally made the contest such a huge success this year!

Regards,
ZI Jony
For the POTY Committee 20:02, 9 May 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (14 May 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2026-04-25 Z5-6100E Achim-Lammerts Geranium-robertianum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JackyM59 14:33, 11 May 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 14 May 2026 (UTC)