You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki.
Concernant Category:Psychologists from Switzerland. Bonjour. Je comprends votre intention, mais cela ne fonctionne pas ainsi dans Commons. En principe, les catégories ne sont pas répétées entre divers niveaux. Un portrait qui est membre d'une catégorie elle-même membre de Category:Psychologists from Switzerland ne doit pas recevoir à nouveau cette catégorie. Vous devriez créer une galerie Portraits of psychologists from Switzerland (en cliquant sur ce lien qui est encore rouge), et y regrouper les portraits de votre choix. Bonne suite sur Commons! MHM (talk) 11:51, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
Danke, ich freue mich das noch einmal mit einem erfahrenen Benutzer zu diskutieren. Normalerweise hast Du recht - ich bin mit dem jetzigen Zustand auch nicht ganz zufrieden.
Das Problem kommt auf, weil jetzt bewusst viele Personen-Kategorien auch für nur ein Bild angelegt werden (das hatte ich im Forum und mit @AnBuKu: diskutiert, das sei gut vor allem wegen Wikidata und anderen Gründen).
Streng genommen dürfte es dann gar keine Bildanzeige (Galerie) in der Kategorie geben, nur Subkategorien für jede Person. Schaust Du z.B. bei Category:Psychologists by country in andere Länder, geht das ziemlich durcheinander. Die bedeutenderen haben eine eigene Personenkategorie und werden nicht als Bild angezeigt, die unbedeutenderen ja (so war es vorher). Das hat mich gestört, weil die Galerie selber sehr interessant ist.
Ich müsste es suchen, aber gegen meinen Vorschlag im Forum, von jeder Person dann auch ein Bild in der Galerie anzuzeigen, gab es keine Einwände. Mich stört jetzt, dass die Galerie erst unten kommt. Deine Lösung ginge - aber für diese eine Kategorie. Gesucht werden sollte eine Lösung für ALLE Personenkategorien, die EINFACH ist (dass auch andere das machen) und wo bei einem Bild pro Person es nicht zufällig ist, ob die in einer Unterkategorie oder in der Galerie angezeigt wird. Meine jetzige Lösung ist wenigstens konsistent: alle haben eine Unterkategorie mit einem oder mehreren Bildern und eins davon wird in der Galerie angezeigt. @MHM55: . We can switch to English?--Wortulo (talk) 15:23, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
Hallo @Wortulo: , wir können weiter auf Deutsch reden... Na ja, die "Galerie" ist schön, so nennts Du die Reihen von Bilder unten in einer Kategorie. Man sollte aber Galerie mit <gallery>...</gallery> auf "Seiten" benützen, wie z.B. Portraits of great physicists oder Portraits of Quakers, wo Namen und Folgereihe (alphabetisch) ganz klar kommen. Es braucht ein bisschen mehr Mühe, aber es sieht viel besser aus. Du machst was Du willst. Es kann aber sein, ich oder andere werden also automatisch die Kategorie für ein Bild weg machen wenn es dopelt wirkt. All the best! MHM (talk) 12:42, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
Hallo, @MHM55: Ich will nicht „einfach machen was ich will“;-) Ich will lieber einen Konsens. Ich hatte das im Forum ja diskutiert und die Probleme dort beschrieben. Für eine richtige Galerie fehlen auch noch viele, vor allem auch aus der Romandie. So entsteht die nebenher ohne Anspruch auf Vollständigkeit. Die Inkonsistenzen hast du auch anderswo - seit Kategorien für Personen mit einem Bild angelegt werden. Wo kann man das nochmal breiter diskutieren? Ich kenne mich in Wikipedia gut aus, hier gibt es über das Forum hinaus noch etwas besseres? Ich klebe nicht an meiner Lösung, will nur eine einfache, aber einheitlichere. Ohne Stress;/)--Wortulo (talk) 12:58, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Conny H. Antoni 2018.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).
Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.
Schau mal, da steht, dass eine mail unterwegs ist - so wie ich es bei Dutzenden Bildern schon gemacht habe. Danke für die Erinnerung, aber ist bekannt. Der Fotograf hat informell schon zugestimmt, nun machen wir es noch formell. Und für den Genehmigungsprozess muss man doch die Datei zuerst hochladen - was ich heute gemacht habe. Also keep cool. Wortulo (talk) 12:36, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2024 voting is open!
2023 Picture of the Year: Incense plays an important role in Vietnamese life. It is considered as a sacred bridge to connect the visible life of human beings and the world of heaven, earth, and gods. Photo taken in Quang Phu Cau village, on the outskirts of Hanoi, Vietnam. In this picture, incense sticks are being set out to dry, after being dipped in the incense solution.
Dear Wikimedian,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2024 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year is the nineteenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2024) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and top 5% of most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2024 voting is open!
Dear Wikimedian,
You are receiving this message because we noticed that you previously voted in the Picture of the Year contest. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2024) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2024.
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2025 voting is open!
2024 Picture of the Year:Mundari man polishing the horns of one of his Watusi cows using a mixture of cow urine and ash as a ritualistic and protective practice in a temporary cattle camp in Terekeka, South Sudan.
Dear Wikimedian,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2025 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year is the twentieth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favourite images featured on Commons during the last year (2025) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the top 5% of most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just five images to become the Picture of the Year.
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2025 voting is open!
Dear Wikimedian,
You are receiving this message because we noticed that you previously voted in the Picture of the Year contest. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favourite images featured on Commons during the last year (2025) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of five images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2025.
Announcing the Winners of Picture of the Year 2025!
Hi everyone,
Wikimedia Commons is pleased to finally announce the winners of this year's Picture of the Year 2025 contest! We had some truly incredible finalists to choose from, but the community has spoken.
Here are your top three winning images:
First place: The aftermath of an Israeli airstrike in Gaza City on October 9, 2023, leaving widespread destruction in the Rimal area. Attribution: WAFA (Q2915969) / CC-BY-SA 3.0
Second place: Baby cape fur seal (Arctocephalus pusillus) sleeping at Cape cross, Namibia. Attribution: Giles Laurent / CC-BY-SA 4.0
Third place: A gigantic jet photographed from the International Space Station by astronaut Nichole Ayers. Attribution: public domain
You can view the full results and see where all your favorite images placed here: Full 2025 Results
I also want to highlight what an incredible turnout we had. In the second round, we saw a massive jump in both the number of users voting and the total votes cast. We had exactly 13,979 votes cast by 3,509 users! To put that in perspective, last year we had 7,403 votes from 2,837 users. It is amazing to see that level of growth and community engagement.
Thank you to everyone who voted, helped organize, and generally made the contest such a huge success this year!
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!