Wikimore

English: Welcome to the Commons, Ezarate!

First steps tutorial Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki ‒ it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities. All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: `[[:Image:Foo.jpg]]`, which produces: `Image:Foo.jpg` If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: `{{bad name\|Correct name}}` For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

--SieBot 16:50, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! CasaBarrioLosTroncosMDPArg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --MB-one 22:28, 11 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 14 March 2024 (UTC)

Sorry

So, d'ye want to meet up on Discord sometime this week, and I'll do a little restoration primer? Could do it most days, but we'd need to coordinate schedule. Adam Cuerden (talk) 12:09, 22 March 2024 (UTC)

@Adam Cuerden: Tomorrow, Sat 23th March at afternoon? Regards!! Ezarateesteban 12:19, 22 March 2024 (UTC)

Sure. Which time zone are ye, though? Username's fergusthedwarf - started it for Dungeons and Dragons Adam Cuerden (talk) 22:29, 22 March 2024 (UTC)

@Adam Cuerden: I'm in Argentina (UTC-3) --Ezarateesteban 01:34, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

Might have to delay a day or so: my power cable gave out, and I do all my restorations on my laptop. Adam Cuerden (talk) 21:32, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

dont worry!! antoher day may be. Regards!!! Ezarateesteban 21:37, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

Imagen

¿Por favor, puedes revisar ésta imagen?

Aurelio de Sandoval (Mensajes aquí please) 16:37, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

Done --Ezarateesteban 16:44, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

Imágenes

¿Puedes por favor revisar y aprobar éstas imágenes?

Aurelio de Sandoval (Mensajes aquí please) 05:11, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

@Ezarate Por favor. Aurelio de Sandoval (Mensajes aquí please) 19:05, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ParqueUTEplaza-MVD-abr2024-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 00:27, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SilosRutas74y29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Tilted and somehow grainy --Poco a poco 19:28, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
done, thanks!!! --Ezarate 23:56, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
Better, but there's still some tilt. Please, darken also the shadows a bit. --Poco a poco 20:33, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
done --Ezarate 23:21, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
What is done? you didn't adjust the tilt, just the curves --Poco a poco 07:58, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
done, now straighten --Ezarate 18:24, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
You need perspective correction, both sides are leaning out, especially the right side --Poco a poco 18:11, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
done --Ezarate 23:29, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Support Not perfecto, slight ccw tilt and I'd darken the shadows, but overall acceptable --Poco a poco 20:07, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 13 April 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! PavoReal-ParqueUTEURU.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --MB-one 17:50, 13 April 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! AtlanticoShopping-PuntadelEste1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
It needs a perspective correction and the disturbing pole on the right schould be cropped --Poco a poco 06:25, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
done, thanks!! --Ezarate 13:27, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:22, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gualeguaychu-Costanera-mar2024-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --MB-one 08:24, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Piriapolis-panorámica-abr2024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support A bit grainy but good quality. --MB-one 10:19, 15 April 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! RioGualeguaychu-Clubpescadores.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 20 April 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! TamboLapataia-cartel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --MB-one 07:43, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 25 April 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! PlacaRosarioVeraPeñaloza.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:54, 24 April 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 26 April 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! FALGBT-BSAS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Need perspective correction, also some CA. --ArildV 05:39, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
done, thanks!! --Ezarate 16:07, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
Support Thank you for the new version. Ok imo. --ArildV 08:18, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! PulperiaQuilapan-BuenosAires.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Severely distorted. Perspective correction gone wrong? --MB-one 12:32, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
done, reprocessed --Ezarate 18:40, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Can you crop the front of the vehicle on the right? And somehow the noise seem to have been increased. Otherwise good. --MB-one 22:31, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
done, denoised a bit and cropped --Ezarate 12:33, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --MB-one 20:46, 11 May 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 14 May 2024 (UTC)

Edward VIII FP nomination

Hi - the file name is incorrect for two reasons. There is a typo; Edward VIII not Edward VII. Secondly, at the time the picture was taken, Edward was not Edward VIII but Prince of Wales. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:26, 16 May 2024 (UTC)

I go to fix it when nomination finished. Regards!!! Ezarateesteban 01:34, 17 May 2024 (UTC)

File:Wikimania2017-day3.25.jpg

File:Wikimania2017-day3.25.jpg has been nominated for deletion at

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Wikimania2017-day3.25.jpg

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

2800:810:446:7F9:F900:328E:5D96:CC2E 04:11, 21 May 2024 (UTC)

File:Caminito-Collague.png

File:Caminito-Collague.png has been nominated for deletion at

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Caminito-Collague.png

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Royuoi (talk) 13:37, 23 June 2024 (UTC)

File:Caminito-Collague.png

File:Caminito-Collague.png has been nominated for deletion at

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Caminito-Collague.png

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Royuoi (talk) 13:39, 23 June 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! AvBuzon-Tandil-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 01:41, 16 July 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Barrebelde-BsAs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 00:33, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! IglesiaSagradaEucarisitia-VirgendeLujan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
slightly turned to the left, a little too much around --Georgfotoart 17:38, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
done, thanks!! --Ezarate 17:54, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Georgfotoart 20:56, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 24 July 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Statue of Our Lady of Luján, in Iglesia Sagrada Eucarisitia, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 2 August 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MonumentoInsurgentesSilesia-KatowicePoland.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
CommentI find the crop on the right side very distracting, sorry to say. Could you improve this? --Kritzolina 15:52, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
done, thanks!! --Ezarate 18:45, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
Much better now, thank you! QI for me now. --Kritzolina 17:56, 22 August 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 25 August 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! PatriHorrillo-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Tagooty 00:35, 27 August 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! EstherBonet-WM2024-1-1-1-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
A bit noisy. Otherwise very nice. --MB-one 14:23, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
denoised, thanks!!!! --Ezarate 19:15, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --MB-one 08:08, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 29 August 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! FlaviaDoria-Wikimania2024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:00, 31 August 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 2 September 2024 (UTC)

Convención de Berna + PD-AR-Photo

Hola Esteban, siendo un admin de Argentina, quizás te interese participar en la discusión sobre cómo Argentina implementó la Convención de Berna. Si mis hallazgos son correctos, podemos ampliar las fotos que están en el dominio público de Argentina y USA. Saludos. Günther Frager (talk) 21:08, 16 September 2024 (UTC)

Gracias por el aviso!! ahi voy a leer Ezarateesteban 23:12, 16 September 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aline Masson con tocado de gasa by Raimundo Madrazo.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Going to church by Pancho Fierro.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:23, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!

**2022 Picture of the Year**: Great Cormorant (Phalacrocorax carbo), Little Egret (Egretta garzetta) and Gadwall (Mareca strepera) in Nepal.

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2023 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighteenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and top 5% of most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on 14 October 2024, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2022 Picture of the Year contest.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:04, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! PlacaBasilicaMerced.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Bgag 03:22, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 3 October 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! PlacaBasilicaMerced2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:41, 3 October 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 5 October 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sacerdote-CatedraldeBuenosAires.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Needs a PR template --Tagooty 00:49, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
done, thanks!!! --Ezarate 11:24, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Tagooty 05:49, 5 October 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! PlacaBasilicaMerced1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Needs PC; possible to avoid top right cropping? --Tagooty 03:02, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Done, thanks!!! --Ezarate 12:29, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Tagooty 05:49, 5 October 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 8 October 2024 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you previously voted in the Picture of the Year contest. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2023.

Round 2 will end at 28 October 2024, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

If you have already voted for Round 2, please ignore this message.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:09, 16 October 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tilcara-montañas-01134.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Needs WB to be checked IMO --Екатерина Борисова 01:09, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
done, thanks --Ezarate 11:24, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
Support Now colors look much more natural, thank you. Mountains are soft a bit, but I think that overall quality is good.. --Екатерина Борисова 01:50, 16 October 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 18 October 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tilcara-caminomontañas-01136.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 02:03, 20 October 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 22 October 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puestohidratacion-ReservaElCorredor.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Tagooty 01:04, 24 October 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:45, 26 October 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! VicSfriso-Editatonanfibios.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:51, 27 October 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:45, 29 October 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
'Poster of Hollywood, film of 1923, with Hope Drown as Angela.'.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 11 November 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! PlacaMartinRodriguez-Tandil.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --AuHaidhausen 16:37, 16 November 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! BarraCasaTinta-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Can you reduce the noise and sharpen? --Mike Peel 19:46, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
done, thanks --Ezarate 22:07, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 09:44, 14 December 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

Happy holidays!

* Happy Holidays! *

Merry Christmas! Happy New Year!

Joyeux Noël! Bonne année!

Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr!

¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!

Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!

-- George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:42, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

Best wishes for 2025!

	* Happy Holidays, Ezarate! *
	Joyeux Noël! Bonne année! Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком! Happy Holidays and best wishes for 2025!

Pierre André ^(talk) 11:23, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Poster of With Wings Outspread.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! PlayaVarese1-MDP-ene2025.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 15:30, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! PlayaVarese-MDP-ene2025.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 15:29, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! PlayaLaPerla2-ene2015-MDP.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 19:10, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! PlayaBristol1-MDP-ene2025.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 16:08, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! PlayaBristol-MDP-ene2025.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 16:08, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! PlayaLasToscas-ene2025-MDP.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
I propose to crop a bunch at the bottom, see note --Poco a poco 17:01, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
done, thanks --Ezarate 19:21, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:34, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! PlayaLaPerla3-MDP.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 21:55, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! PlayaLasToscas-MDP-ene2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Too dark. --Milseburg 15:24, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
done, reprocessed thanks!! --Ezarate 23:01, 30 January 2025 (UTC) I suggest uplighting the shadows much more. What about the clouds? Shouldn't they have to be more white on a rather sunny day? --Milseburg 18:10, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
done, thanks!! --Ezarate 19:25, 31 January 2025 (UTC) Better and above the QI-bar, I think. --Milseburg 20:35, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 4 February 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! EdificiosMaral24y30-MDP.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Slight tilt CW needs to be corrected and it could be sharpened a bit --MB-one 23:42, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
done, thanks!!! --Ezarate 13:28, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --MB-one 09:16, 3 February 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 6 February 2025 (UTC)

Template:SaladeMedios-IM

I checked the website, but they only mentioned the "Creative Commons" license without specifying the conditions (BY/NC/ND) or version. Where can I verify this information that they released their images under CC BY-SA 4.0?--Namoroka (talk) 03:02, 10 February 2025 (UTC)

Check now, please --Ezarateesteban 15:46, 10 February 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for your reply; but they still did not specified which version shall be applied. (2.0, 3.0, 4.0, etc.) Please see Template:Cc-by-sa.--Namoroka (talk) 15:57, 10 February 2025 (UTC)

Hello @Namoroka, since Sala de Medios is more of an institutional partnership of Wikimedistas de Uruguay, I'm stepping in to answer this question. When Sala de Medios applied the license, they didn't specify the version in their website. I'd suggest that we keep the most recent version of the license that was available when they did the release in 2018 (that would be version 3), particularly considering that the differences among license versions aren't particularly big. We've already requested them to clarify the license version. cheers, Scann (WDU) (talk) 11:45, 11 February 2025 (UTC)

@Scann (WDU), thank you for your clarify. I understand that there are no big diffrence between various versions, but it would be much better if they specify in detail. Thanks again.--Namoroka (talk) 14:51, 11 February 2025 (UTC)

Hello @Namoroka, fortunately they were quick to solve the issue, and now you can find the website with the proper license -- find it here. It's a CC BY SA 4.0 and it also has now a link to the deed. Cheers! Scann (WDU) (talk) 20:47, 11 February 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! LQ-KHV-PoliciaBsAs-MDP.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Shougissime 22:46, 7 February 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 10 February 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! PlacaBvdMaritimoPeraltaRamos-MDP.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 23:23, 9 February 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 12 February 2025 (UTC)

Question?

Thanks for reviewing this nomination recently! You mentioned that another image is of better resolution and value. Is this the image you are referring to? ツredmyname ^💬 14:47, 12 February 2025 (UTC)

Hello, yes and I think there is another better than nominated. Regards!!!! --Ezarateesteban 20:26, 12 February 2025 (UTC)

Thanks again, and what another image are you referring to, I think this should be valued, because its cropped version is used in most projects and articles about her.
ツredmyname ^💬 09:54, 13 February 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Placa-CatedralGualeguaychu.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 20:42, 10 February 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 13 February 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Placa1-CatedralGualeguaychu.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:26, 11 February 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 14 February 2025 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
LQ-KHV, aircraft owned by Buenos Aires Provincial Police.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 16 February 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Estatuas-CatedralGualeguaychu.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality --Tzim78 19:01, 13 February 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 16 February 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! PlacaPasajeUmbrella-Gualeguaychu.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 18 February 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! PasajeUmbrella-Gualeguaychu.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 3 March 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! GuardiaNacionaldelMar-carnavalMDP2025.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Olivier LPB 16:14, 4 March 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 7 March 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! GuardiaNacionaldelMar-carnavalMDP2025.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Olivier LPB 16:14, 4 March 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 8 March 2025 (UTC)

File:AlegoriaalRioParanaMonumentoalaBandera-RosarioArgentina-03673.jpg

File:AlegoriaalRioParanaMonumentoalaBandera-RosarioArgentina-03673.jpg has been nominated for deletion at

Commons:Deletion requests/File:AlegoriaalRioParanaMonumentoalaBandera-Rosari…

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 02:30, 11 March 2025 (UTC)

File:AlegoríaOceanoAtlánticoMonumentoalaBandera-sep2016.jpg

File:AlegoríaOceanoAtlánticoMonumentoalaBandera-sep2016.jpg has been nominated for deletion at

Commons:Deletion requests/File:AlegoríaOceanoAtlánticoMonumentoalaBandera-se…

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 02:31, 11 March 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! LauraLeguizamon en el Carnaval de Mar del Plata 2025.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 22:08, 8 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! IrupeJacobsen-CarnavalMDP2025.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 22:08, 8 March 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 11 March 2025 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Fly head, eyes.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Fly head, eyes.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 13 March 2025 (UTC)

Deleted content

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ हिन्दी ∙ বাংলা ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ +/−

Hello Ezarate, the following content you uploaded violates one or more of our policies and therefore has been or will soon be deleted:

File:Kendall Jenner in 2019 2.png

The Wikimedia Commons (this website) only hosts media files with a realistic educational purpose and that can be used for any purpose, including:

use in any work, regardless of content
creation of derivative works
commercial use
free distribution

See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons, and Commons:Image casebook for some specific examples. Some other Wikimedia projects have different licensing policies. For example, the English Wikipedia allows fair use of sounds and photographs. This is not the case on Wikimedia Commons; "fair use" materials are not acceptable here.

Please make sure that you only upload educational content you have created yourself, those which are out of copyright, or those for which you have the required permission for the work to be used in all the ways described above. Please note that derivative works of copyrighted material are also considered copyrighted. Again, please read through Commons:Licensing, which is quite crucial, to understanding how Wikimedia Commons works. Thanks for your contribution, and please do leave me a message if you have further questions.

Yours sincerely, Yann (talk) 16:46, 13 March 2025 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been nominated for deletion at

Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Equestrian statue of Martín Rodr…

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated contents should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:MonumentoGralRodriguez.jpg

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 02:35, 22 March 2025 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been nominated for deletion at

Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Equestrian statue of Juan Antoni…

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated contents should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:MonumentoaArenales-nov2013.JPG

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 02:36, 22 March 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MelanieGriffits-CarnavalMDP2025-Plozessor-crop.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 12:51, 22 March 2025 (UTC)
~~Oppose~~ I disagree, even though the brightness and sharpness is way better than in the source File:MelanieGriffits-CarnavalMDP2025.tif. ~~First of all, the photo was upscaled from the source.~~ And there are artifacts, most prominently the patterns similar to goose bumps on her lower right arm just above the bracelet (the one shown on the left side of the photo), or the peculiar patterns on the same arm close to the shoulder. I suppose that even the dark freckles on the face might be an AI-misinterpretation of some hairs or shadows. This photo is overprocessed. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 14:59, 22 March 2025 (UTC)
Comment Sorry, I don't think any more that the photo was upscaled. And may be the goose bumps were there and became visible by some raw conversion miracle. But their ellipsoid patterns look odd and the patterns higher up on the arm look highly unusual. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 15:11, 22 March 2025 (UTC)
@Robert Flogaus-Faust: I used AI denoising, but there is nothing AI-generated or AI-upscaled here. These patterns exited on the original raw file, and my processing apparently increased their visibility. I found another defect (too strong CA removal) and uploaded a new version where I also improved the two areas you mentioned. --Plozessor 16:13, 22 March 2025 (UTC)
Support O.k., this version looks much better. Thanks! --Robert Flogaus-Faust 18:39, 22 March 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! PuestoventaMDP.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Plozessor 02:09, 8 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sacerdotes-CatedralMDP.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Should be rotated correctly. --Plozessor 03:56, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
done, thanks!!!! --Ezarate 13:35, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Plozessor 02:15, 8 April 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 10 April 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! PlacaMonumentoalvasco.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 07:01, 13 April 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 16 April 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SacerdoteIglesiaFranciscoJavier-CABA.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Needs a PR template. WB seems off, too reddish. --Tagooty 03:22, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
done, thanks! --Ezarate 14:01, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:09, 21 April 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ChevroletMeriva-Tandil.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Plozessor 02:49, 21 May 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:"The Bandit of Point Loma - a stirring western showing how the light-house keeper captured a marauding desperado" restored.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:"The Bandit of Point Loma - a stirring western showing how the light-house keeper captured a marauding desperado" restored.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 28 June 2025 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Poster of The Bandit of Point Loma - a stirring western showing how the light-house keeper captured a marauding desperado.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Cabiria LCCN2007676108-restored.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cabiria LCCN2007676108-restored.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 9 July 2025 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Le Cirque Miniature - Cândido de Faria - 1908.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Le Cirque Miniature - Cândido de Faria - 1908.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 14 July 2025 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Poster of film Cabiria.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 15 July 2025 (UTC)

Results of Wiki Loves Folklore 2025 are out!

Hi, Greetings
The winners for Wiki Loves Folklore 2025 are announced! We are happy to share with you winning images for this year's edition.
This year saw over 85715 images from 1912 uploaders represented on Commons in over 142 countries.

Kindly see the winning media here.

Thank you to all photographers, jurors, and cultural documentarians who helped make #WikiLovesFolklore 2025 a global success!

We hope you will consider contributing to the campaign next year.

Thank you,
Wiki Loves Folklore International Team

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:13, 17 July 2025 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pablo y Virginia by Rafael Barradas.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 18 July 2025 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Poster of Cirque miniature by Cândido de Faria.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 20 July 2025 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:SanCayetano-IglesiaSagixedradaEucaristia-CABA.jpg

Copyright status: File:SanCayetano-IglesiaSagixedradaEucaristia-CABA.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ತುಳು ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ 中文（臺灣） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:SanCayetano-IglesiaSagixedradaEucaristia-CABA.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{self|cc-zero}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 18:05, 31 July 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SagradoCorazondeJesus-IglesiaSagradaEcuaristia-CABA.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:42, 1 August 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 3 August 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! EstatuaSantaTeresita-IglesiaSagradaEucaristia-CABA.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
White balance needs to be corrected and I don't like the crop either. --Tisha Mukherjee 08:32, 31 July 2025 (UTC) fixed, thanks! --Ezarate 16:41, 31 July 2025 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 09:46, 1 August 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 4 August 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! CuraBrochero-IglesiaSagradaEucaristia-CABA.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:44, 5 August 2025 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Statue to José Gabriel Brochero in Saint Eucharisty church, CABA, Argentina.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Statue to Sacred Hearth in Saint Eucharisty church, CABA, Argentina.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Statue to Thérèse de Lisieux, in Saint Eucharisty church, CABA, Argentina.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 11 August 2025 (UTC)

File:AlfajorlahechiceraMDP.jpg

File:AlfajorlahechiceraMDP.jpg has been nominated for deletion at

Commons:Deletion requests/File:AlfajorlahechiceraMDP.jpg

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Stratovarius22 (talk) 16:42, 15 August 2025 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:The regeneration of worthless Dan LCCN2005679772-restored.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:The regeneration of worthless Dan LCCN2005679772-restored.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 20 August 2025 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:The Village Schoolmaster-restored.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:The Village Schoolmaster-restored.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 31 August 2025 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Poster of The Village Schoolmaster.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 13 September 2025 (UTC)

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2024 voting is open!

**2023 Picture of the Year**: Incense plays an important role in Vietnamese life. It is considered as a sacred bridge to connect the visible life of human beings and the world of heaven, earth, and gods. Photo taken in Quang Phu Cau village, on the outskirts of Hanoi, Vietnam. In this picture, incense sticks are being set out to dry, after being dipped in the incense solution.

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2024 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year is the nineteenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2024) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and top 5% of most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on 27 September 2025, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2023 Picture of the Year contest.

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2024 voting is open!

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you previously voted in the Picture of the Year contest. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2024) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2024.

Round 2 will end at 11 October 2025, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now! If you have already voted for Round 2, please ignore this message.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Hans' Millions 1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Hans' Millions 1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 23 October 2025 (UTC)

Join the first national Wiki Science Competition 2025 in India from 1 Nov to 15 Dec

Hello Ezarate!,

You are receiving this message as you have previously participated in one of the Wiki Loves X campaigns or are an active Wikimedia Commons contributor.

We’re excited to announce that the Wiki Science Competition 2025 in India is being organized for the very first time at a national level. This global campaign celebrates science through freely licensed images, videos, and other media on Wikimedia Commons. By participating, you help make science more visible, accessible, and inspiring to people everywhere.

The competition features eight exciting categories:

People in Science
Microscopy
Astronomy
Everyday Science
Scientific Equipment
Chemistry
Physics
Special Category

Campaign Duration: The competition will run from 1 November to 15 December 2025. You can upload your images anytime during this period.

Images taken before 1 November 2025 are also eligible, as long as they have never been uploaded to Wikimedia Commons before.

We’re excited to introduce the first-ever dedicated "Mobile Photography" participation option. Now, you can upload photographs taken with your mobile phone directly through a special upload wizard.

This new option is designed to encourage students and individuals who may not have access to high-end cameras like DSLRs to participate. Whether your images are captured using a mobile phone or a professional DSLR, all submissions will be judged equally within the relevant category. This ensures that everyone has an equal opportunity to capture and share the wonders of science from their own perspective.

Please visit the official pages for more details:

Commons page: Wiki Science Competition 2025 in India
Website: wikisciencecompetition.in
Participating countries: Wiki Science Competition 2025

We look forward to your participation and support in making this national campaign a great success. It’s your chance to participate, get recognized, and show how science looks through your lens!. Thank you.

-- Suyash Dwivedi (💬) 10:07, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

On behalf of Wiki Science Competition, India 2025 organizing team

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:The Last Laugh-restored.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:The Last Laugh-restored.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 31 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Ventas1989TaylorSwift.svg

File:Ventas1989TaylorSwift.svg has been nominated for deletion at

Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:3D charts

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Apocheir.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion (shown above) or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 01:25, 7 November 2025 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:The Gaumont Co. L'T'D. London presents the motion picture records of the undying story of Capt. Scott and animal life in the Antarctic - The Morgan Lith. Co., Cleveland, O. LCCN2002713102-restored.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:The Gaumont Co. L'T'D. London presents the motion picture records of the undying story of Capt. Scott and animal life in the Antarctic - The Morgan Lith. Co., Cleveland, O. LCCN2002713102-restored.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 10 November 2025 (UTC)

File:The Gaumont Co. L'T'D. London presents the motion picture records of the undying story of Capt. Scott and animal life in the Antarctic - The Morgan Lith. Co., Cleveland, O. LCCN2002713102-restored.jpgf

File:The Gaumont Co. L'T'D. London presents the motion picture records of the undying story of Capt. Scott and animal life in the Antarctic - The Morgan Lith. Co., Cleveland, O. LCCN2002713102-restored.jpgf has been nominated for deletion at

Commons:Deletion requests/File:The Gaumont Co. L'T'D. London presents the mo…

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Javidd (talk) 18:41, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (27 November 2025)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Placa-ManuelBelgrano-Tandil.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
@Ezarate: you would have to crop it to cut out these black borders from the top and left --Gower 08:16, 23 November 2025 (UTC)
fixed, thanks! --Ezarate 16:43, 23 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Gower 08:24, 24 November 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 27 November 2025 (UTC)

Happy holidays!

Merry Christmas and warm wishes for a joyful, healthy, and peaceful New Year 2026!

-- Radomianin (talk) 11:30, 21 December 2025 (UTC)

Happy holidays! * 2026 !

* Happy Holidays! *

Merry Christmas and a happy New Year!
¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
Joyeux Noël et bonne année!
Frohe Weihnachten und ein glückliches Neues Jahr!
Wesołych Świąt i Szczęśliwego Nowego Roku!
Щасливого Різдва i з Новим роком!
Boldog karácsonyt és boldog új évet!
Καλά Χριστούγεννα και καλή χρονιά!

-- George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:18, 21 December 2025 (UTC)

Happy holidays and best wishes for 2026!

✨ Happy Holidays
Ezarate!
🎄 Merry Christmas!
🎉 Best wishes for 2026!

-- Giles Laurent (talk) 20:03, 22 December 2025 (UTC)

Feliz año!

Hola, Ezarate! Acabo de ver tu edit en la entrada de Carlos Tomas Sourigues. Me encuentro buscando información de él ya que soy familiar directo e intento de descubrir mejor que rol desempeñaba. Podemos ponernos en contacto? ~2026-14375-1 (talk) 20:49, 7 January 2026 (UTC)

Si claro, create una cuenta y me mandas un correo electrónico via este medio Ezarateesteban 20:53, 7 January 2026 (UTC)

File:MajuPlanas-Editatonanfibios.jpg

File:MajuPlanas-Editatonanfibios.jpg has been nominated for deletion at

Commons:Deletion requests/File:MajuPlanas-Editatonanfibios.jpg

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Maju Planas (WMAR) (talk) 17:48, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (22 January 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! NuestraSeñoradeLujan-IglesiaFatima-MDP.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:29, 20 January 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:51, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Folklore 2026 has started, Join us!

Hello Ezarate,

The world’s traditions are disappearing faster than we can document them, but you can help change that.

On behalf of the Wiki Loves Folklore International Team, we are reaching out to invite you to contribute to the 2026 edition of our global campaign.

Share Your Cultural Heritage with the World

Wiki Loves Folklore is an international media contest dedicated to documenting the "intangible" beauty of our cultures. Whether it’s the vibrant colours of a folk festival, the rhythm of a traditional dance, the secrets of a family recipe, or the legends of your hometown, your media helps preserve these legacies for generations to come.

How You Can Contribute Participating is simple, and every upload contributes to the world's largest free knowledge repository:

Capture: Take photos, record videos, or capture audio of folk activities, music, mythology, or traditional wear.
Upload: Share your files on Wikimedia Commons between 1 February 2026 and 31 March 2026.
Win: Beyond the satisfaction of preservation, there are international prizes for the most impactful contributions.

Ready to get started? Click here to upload your media now or visit the Main Project Page for full rules and category details.

Your perspective is a vital piece of the global cultural puzzle. We can't wait to see the folklore you bring to life.

Warm regards,

#WeTogether

Wiki Loves Folklore International Team

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:53, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

Category:Taragüi

Category:Taragüi is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:

CSD C2 (unuseful empty category)

If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted).
All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log.
If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead.

العربية ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ हिन्दी ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ 日本語 ∙ кыргызча ∙ ਪੰਜਾਬੀ ∙ português ∙ русский ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

heylenny (^talk/_edits) 16:12, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

File:Carnaval2026MDP.135.jpg

File:Carnaval2026MDP.135.jpg has been nominated for deletion at

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Carnaval2026MDP.135.jpg

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

~2026-21135-27 (talk) 23:21, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Carnaval2026MDP.134.jpg

File:Carnaval2026MDP.134.jpg has been nominated for deletion at

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Carnaval2026MDP.134.jpg

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

~2026-21135-27 (talk) 23:21, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2025 voting is open!

**2024 Picture of the Year**:Mundari man polishing the horns of one of his Watusi cows using a mixture of cow urine and ash as a ritualistic and protective practice in a temporary cattle camp in Terekeka, South Sudan.

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2025 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year is the twentieth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favourite images featured on Commons during the last year (2025) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the top 5% of most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just five images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on 18 April 2026, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2024 Picture of the Year contest.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:27, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
cover of motion picture records of the undying story of Capt. Scott and animal life in the Antarctic.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Poster of film Hans' Millions.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

Saludo

Hola Esteban. Soy Claudio. Un gusto conocerte. Claudioaps (talk) 17:26, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

User talk:Ezarate

Quality Image Promotion

Sorry

Imagen

Imágenes

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Edward VIII FP nomination

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Valued Image Promoted

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Convención de Berna + PD-AR-Photo

Valued Image Promoted

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Valued Image Promoted

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Happy holidays!

Best wishes for 2025!

Valued Image Promoted

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Question?

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Valued Image Promoted

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

FP Promotion

Deleted content

Notification about possible deletion

Notification about possible deletion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

FP Promotion

Valued Image Promoted

FP Promotion

FP Promotion

Valued Image Promoted

Results of Wiki Loves Folklore 2025 are out!

Valued Image Promoted

Valued Image Promoted

Copyright status: File:SanCayetano-IglesiaSagixedradaEucaristia-CABA.jpg

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Valued Image Promoted

FP Promotion