User talk:Ahmet Düz

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:2023-07-22 Museumsnacht Freiburg BR 020.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ français ∙ hrvatski ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ polski ∙

português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ slovenščina ∙ ไทย ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:2023-07-22 Museumsnacht Freiburg BR 020.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

A.Savin 20:22, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:2023-11-09 KuMa Eröffnung 003.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ français ∙ hrvatski ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ polski ∙

português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ slovenščina ∙ ไทย ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:2023-11-09 KuMa Eröffnung 003.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

A.Savin 13:25, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023-06-17 Bahnhofsfest Loerrach 020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:25, 23 June 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:47, 26 June 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023-06-07 BUGA Mannheim 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 10:46, 20 July 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 23 July 2024 (UTC)

Dein Bild eines NSU 1200

Ich musste die Kategorie ändern. Hast Du denn nicht gemerkt, dass das kein NSU Prinz IV ist, sondern das größere Modell?? OnkelFordTaunus (talk) 22:38, 26 July 2024 (UTC)

Gute Nacht! Das müsste eine Anfängerfehler sein, von vor paar Monaten! Danke dir aber trotzdem! Viele Grüße, Ahmet Düz (talk) 22:46, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Alles klar! Entschuldige bitte, wenn ich etwas zu unhöflich war. Trotzdem vielen Dank für Deine Beiträge. OnkelFordTaunus (talk) 22:55, 26 July 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2024-04-20 HCC Einweihungsfeier 038.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 12:57, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2024-04-20 HCC Einweihungsfeier 039.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:38, 2 August 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 5 August 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2024-01-05 Trauerfeier Schaeuble 069.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. Any possibility to identify the unit? --MB-one 15:33, 9 August 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 12 August 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2024-06-11 Anteilnahme Mannheim 011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:33, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:46, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

Fotowettbewerbe

Hallo Ahmet, wir hatten bei der Wikicon die Chance miteinander zu reden, aber ich hab dich mehrfach mit deiner Kamera vorbeilaufen sehen. Sind die eigentlich unsere WLX-Fotowettbewerbe bekannt? Wiki Loves Monuments, Wiki Loves Earth und Wiki Loves Folklore. Leider sind die für dieses Jahr schon beendet. Aber 2025 werden sie wieder steigen. Also wenn du Fotos von Schutzgebieten und Naturdenkmalen, Kulturdenkmalen sowie Festen und Bräuchen machst, kannst du damit auch an diesen Wettbewerben teilnehmen

Viele Grüße Z thomas 06:01, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

Guten Morgen! Ich danke dir für die Hinweise auf die Fotowettbewerbe für das kommende Jahr 2025! Ich überlege es mir mal genauer. Viele Grüße, Ahmet Düz (talk) 07:45, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023-06-07 BUGA Mannheim 094.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:36, 12 October 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 14 October 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2024-10-18 MPM-Days BS 028.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 09:24, 31 December 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2024-10-26 MPM-Days Freiburg BR 027.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:11, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:45, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2024-12-15 Bus FREUND 012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:02, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2024-10-26 MPM-Days Freiburg BR 022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 15:24, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2024-09-28 ORM Offenburg 077.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Горбунова М.С. 07:03, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023-05-18 Verfassungsfest RLP 028.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:58, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2024-06-11 Anteilnahme Mannheim 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --PantheraLeo1359531 19:43, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2024-06-11 Anteilnahme Mannheim 023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality, important documentation --PantheraLeo1359531 19:43, 15 February 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 18 February 2025 (UTC)

File:2025-01-29 Wahlplakate Rheinfelden DE 002.jpg

File:2025-01-29 Wahlplakate Rheinfelden DE 002.jpg has been nominated for deletion at
Commons:Deletion requests/File:2025-01-29 Wahlplakate Rheinfelden DE 002.jpg

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

DCB (talk) 19:29, 3 March 2025 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been nominated for deletion at
Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Election posters for the 2025 Ge…

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated contents should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Grand-Duc (talk) 15:57, 4 March 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2024-09-28 ORM Offenburg 053.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Btspurplegalaxy 21:57, 7 March 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2025-03-06 Anteilnahme Strohmarkt MA 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --PantheraLeo1359531 14:47, 9 March 2025 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2024-10-05 WikiCon 2024 041.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 16:58, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 12 March 2025 (UTC)

Autopatrol given

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. Kadı Message 00:01, 27 March 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2024-01-05 Trauerfeier Schaeuble 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support A bit noisy, but still acceptable for the situation. --Plozessor 03:38, 27 March 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 29 March 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023-07-30 Vogtsbauernhof Bollenhuttraeger 007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 18:37, 1 April 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 4 April 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2023-07-30 Vogtsbauernhof Akkordeonorchester 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 07:35, 6 April 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2025-03-16 Regio-Messe LÖ 029.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Lvova 12:57, 7 April 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 10 April 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2025-04-02 GV RegBas Fuehrung Vitra 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:34, 8 April 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 11 April 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2025-04-02 GV RegBas Fuehrung Vitra 023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:09, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 12 April 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2025-04-02 GV RegBas Fuehrung Vitra 031.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --AuHaidhausen 07:30, 11 April 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 14 April 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2025-04-02 GV RegBas Fuehrung Vitra 014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 06:30, 16 April 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 19 April 2025 (UTC)

Einladung WLE Deutschland

Hallo Ahmet, da du in den vergangenen noch nicht an WLE teilgenommen hast, hast du auch keine Einladung bekommen. Da ich weiß, dass du ein fleißiger und guter Fotograf bist. hier eine persönliche Einladung für WLE

Ich hoffe, dass du Lust und Zeit hast, ab 1. Mai Bilder vom naturgeschützten Objekten hochzuladen. Infos gibt es hier de:Wikipedia:Wiki Loves Earth 2025/Deutschland oder du fragst mich :-). Viele Grüße Z thomas 20:36, 19 April 2025 (UTC)

Danke dir hierfür vielmals! Muss ich mir mal ein bisschen überlegen! Viele Grüße, Ahmet Düz (talk) 20:43, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Na klar, kein Problem. Wir wollen ja niemanden dazu zwingen :-) Z thomas 05:58, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2025-04-02 GV RegBas Fuehrung Vitra 038.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 19:15, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2025-04-26 Brauereifest Rheinfelden AG 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 12:56, 10 May 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:47, 13 May 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2025-05-04 Lesung Siegner Speyer 009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support This one seems good ! --Sebring12Hrs 22:10, 15 May 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 18 May 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2025-04-30 Maimarkt MA 009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 20:15, 16 May 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 19 May 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2025-04-30 Maimarkt MA 109.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 07:12, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 6 June 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2025-05-10 ESC Basel Drumherum 033.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Lvova 19:08, 25 June 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 28 June 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2025-05-10 ESC Basel Drumherum 037.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Picture is ok, added a category. --Plozessor 03:01, 3 July 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 5 July 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2025-05-25 RLP-Tag Neustadt 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:33, 20 October 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 22 October 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2025-06-28 Gedenken Marktplatz Mannheim 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 17:27, 21 October 2025 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2025-07-04 CMB Vernissage Bechdel 009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 05:44, 21 October 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 24 October 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2025-05-25 RLP-Tag Neustadt 015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Romzig 17:27, 22 October 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:43, 25 October 2025 (UTC)

A few thoughts that could help you succeed in QIC

Hi! I’ve noticed that many of your recent nominations have similar technical issues as before - we talked about this some time ago. If you’d like to earn QI badges, some of these problems are quite easy to fix. For example, removing chromatic aberration in editing can make a big difference, and there are plenty of tutorials online for most photo tools. I had the same issue when I started with QIC and learned a lot from fixing it.

It might also help to be selective about which photos you nominate. If a photo is slightly out of focus or cropped awkwardly, it’s unlikely to pass, and that’s okay - QIC is meant to help us improve as photographers. Working on small fixes can be really rewarding, and in the end, I think a well-earned promotion feels much better than counting on luck. -- Jakubhal 08:15, 31 October 2025 (UTC)

Guten Morgen! Alles klar und danke für diese Informationen sowie dieser Tipps! Viele Grüße, Ahmet Düz (talk) 08:35, 31 October 2025 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been nominated for deletion at
Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Vernissage der Sonderausstellung…

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated contents should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Grand-Duc (talk) 02:13, 6 December 2025 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been nominated for deletion at
Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Vernissage der Sonderausstellung…

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated contents should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Grand-Duc (talk) 02:21, 6 December 2025 (UTC)

Unnötige Zeitverschwendung. Die Kunstwerke im Hintergrund zählen etwa als Beiwerk. Viele Grüße, Ahmet Düz (talk) 06:31, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Das hier ist der falsche Platz für eine Erwiderung auf den Löschantrag. Bitte schreibe solche Gegendarstellungen auf die LA-Seiten! Grüße, Grand-Duc (talk) 10:21, 6 December 2025 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been nominated for deletion at
Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Vernissage von der Sonderausstel…

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated contents should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Grand-Duc (talk) 10:24, 6 December 2025 (UTC)

Warning

Hi Ahmet Düz, your email to Itti is apparently in regard to your indefinite block at de:wp by Itti and today's discussion about it. Email access has been taken away from you at de:wp. Please do not use Commons to circumvent this. Regards, AFBorchert (talk) 16:13, 6 December 2025 (UTC)

Danke für Info. Diese Sperre bezieht sich allerdings nur für die de.WP (wie du schon erwähnt hast). Allerdings verstehe ich nicht, warum ich keine Mails mehr schreiben darf, auf Commons? Viele Grüße, Ahmet Düz (talk) 16:18, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Weiterer Nachtrag: Verzeiht mir bitte, falls ich beim Thema Mail auch was falsches gemacht habe. Viele Grüße, Ahmet Düz (talk) 16:19, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
...und außerdem ist dieser IP nicht von mir. Viele Grüße, Ahmet Düz (talk) 16:21, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
(Edit conflict) Hallo Ahmet Düz, vielen Dank für Deine Antwort. Du darfst natürlich noch E-Mails schreiben via Commons, aber nicht zu Angelegenheiten der deutschsprachigen Wikipedia in Umgehung Deiner dort verhängten Sperre, E-Mails zu verschicken. Viele Grüße, --AFBorchert (talk) 16:26, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Zählen dazu auch Angelegenheiten zur WMDE oder WMCH? Viele Grüße, Ahmet Düz (talk) 16:29, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Hallo Ahmet Düz, das Sperren der E-Mail-Funktion ist ausgesprochen ungewöhnlich, selbst bei dauerhaft gesperrten Nutzern. Normalerweise wird diese zusätzliche Sperre nur verhängt, wenn es zum Missbrauch gekommen ist. Ich kenne Deinen Fall jetzt nicht auf de:wp und die möglichen Hintergründe. Wenn aber offenbar wird, dass möglicherweise in dieser Hinsicht problematisches Verhalten auf Commons fortgesetzt wird unter Umgehung der dortigen Sperre, kann das auch zu einer Sperre hier führen. Eine Beschwerde der Empfängerin oder des Empfängers kann dazu ausreichen. Deswegen die Warnung. Viele Grüße, AFBorchert (talk) 16:37, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Alles klar, ich danke dir nochmals ganz herzlichst und verzeiht mir Bitte, falls ich dich auch herausgefordert damit habe. Noch ein wunderschönen Samstagabend! Viele Grüße, Ahmet Düz (talk) 16:40, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
Danke, Dir ebenso! --AFBorchert (talk) 16:42, 6 December 2025 (UTC)

Happy holidays! * 2026 !

   * Happy Holidays! * 
  • Merry Christmas and a happy New Year!
  • ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
  • Joyeux Noël et bonne année!
  • Frohe Weihnachten und ein glückliches Neues Jahr!
  • Wesołych Świąt i Szczęśliwego Nowego Roku!
  • Щасливого Різдва i з Новим роком!
  • Boldog karácsonyt és boldog új évet!
  • Καλά Χριστούγεννα και καλή χρονιά!

   -- George Chernilevsky talk 16:18, 21 December 2025 (UTC)  

Traditional German advent wreath in Lonsee, my home village

Merry Christmas and best wishes for 2026!
Joyeux Noël et une bonne année 2026 !
Frohe Weihnachten und alles Gute für 2026!

AFBorchert (talk) 16:34, 21 December 2025 (UTC)

Vielen Dank für deine Nachricht Ahmet! Ich wünsche dir und deiner Familie ein frohes Fest und einen guten Rutsch! Poco a poco (talk) 14:57, 24 December 2025 (UTC)