User talk:Askeuhd
|
|
still missing
Hi, 8 files are lacking a file description page, see User:Achim55/Files without file pages. Regards, Achim55 (talk) 10:47, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
- These are the files that lack a description:
- File:ISS065-E-476709 - View of Earth.jpg
- File:ISS053-E-394988 - View of Earth.jpg
- File:ISS053-E-395386 - View of Earth.jpg
- File:ISS053-E-396349 - View of Earth.jpg
- File:ISS053-E-396365 - View of Earth.jpg
- File:ISS053-E-402056 - View of Earth.jpg
- File:ISS053-E-402064 - View of Earth.jpg
- File:ISS055-E-60985 - View of Earth.jpg
- File:ISS055-E-61209 - View of Earth.jpg
- File:ISS055-E-61465 - View of Earth.jpg
- File:ISS055-E-61483 - View of Earth.jpg
- File:ISS055-E-61489 - View of Earth.jpg
- File:ISS055-E-61542 - View of Earth.jpg
- File:ISS062-E-40216 - View of Earth.jpg
- File:ISS062-E-40220 - View of Earth.jpg
- File:ISS062-E-40227 - View of Earth.jpg
- File:ISS062-E-40237 - View of Earth.jpg
- File:ISS062-E-40245 - View of Earth.jpg
- Please add a file descriptions to these. I couldn't tell the pattern to do it myself. Jonteemil (talk) 16:00, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
File:ISS010-E-8369 - View of China.jpg
File:ISS010-E-8369 - View of China.jpg has been nominated for deletion at
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much! If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
File issue notice
Hey @Askeuhd, your image, specifically the image File:ISS020-E-12924 - View of Earth.jpg, has errors—specifically the altitude not being a unit-number (|altitude=18Wide character in print at E:\web\wwwroot\Search) and the camera location being invalid (invalid location notice, defaults to null island). If you are active, you could try to fix it or show up with a reply. 2550 69 11hne (talk) 23:56, 25 January 2026 (UTC)
- I am sorry for the inactivity - I fixed the file in question. Askeuhd (talk) 10:18, 5 April 2026 (UTC)
- 😄 2550 69 11hne (talk) 01:11, 6 April 2026 (UTC)
COM:AN/U

File:Dom lourenço revista veja.jpg
This file should not have been deleted. It showed the front-page of a Magazine, which can be used for the wiki page of that magazine, as fair use Benedictus1858 (talk) 23:27, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
- Hello Benedictus1858 - the file was copyrighted and not freely licensed in a manner compatible with Wikimedia Commons. When you uploaded it to Wikimedia Commons you declared it to be compatible with licenses accepted Commons. The licenses on Commons are very broad, and the files on Commons can be used for almost any purpose, which is why this distinction in so important. I stand by my determination of this file - however you may be able to upload your file directly to Wikipedia under the fair use doctrine, instead of uploading it to Wikimedia Commons - you can read more about that here: Wikipedia:Non-free content. I hope this helps. --Askeuhd (talk) 20:15, 18 April 2026 (UTC)
bryant high school
hello Askeuhd can you take photo of bryant high school in virginia please? ~2026-25954-68 (talk) 17:38, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
- Unfortunately I do not take any photos - I just upload them. I suggest you take the photo yourself or add a request at Commons:File requests. --Askeuhd (talk) 18:29, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
Welcome, Dear Patroller!

Hi Askeuhd,
You now have the Patroller right and may call yourself a patroller! Please take a moment to read the updated Commons:Patrol to learn how Patrolling works and how we use it to fight vandalism.
As you know already, the patrolling functionality is enabled for all edits, not just for new-page creations. This enables us to keep track of, for example, edits made by anonymous users here on Commons.
We could use your help at the Counter Vandalism Unit. For example by patrolling an Anonymous-edits checklist and checking a day-part.
If you have any questions please leave a message on the CVU talkpage or ask for help on IRC in #wikimedia-commons. Kadı Message 21:48, 2 May 2026 (UTC)
File talk:HB SABEROV.jpg
File talk:HB SABEROV.jpg
"Materials are available under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (CC BY-SA 4.0) license." © [Ruslan Saberov/Ruslan Saberov, 2026].}} https://vk.com/wall-224355912_1165
Hello! My name is Ruslan Yurievich Saberov. This photo belongs entirely to me, and I allow it to be used. I'm in the photo. This photo was taken by my personal photographer, whom I hired. All copyrights belong only to me, as I paid for the photographer. Accordingly, he has no rights. The rights are completely mine.
I am the artist and musician in these photos and I give full rights to use my photos to those who write the article and upload the file. https://vk.com/ruslansaberov File:HB SABEROV.jpg ~2026-26890-43 (talk) 20:28, 3 May 2026 (UTC)
Deletion requests
Hello, I think I made a mistake. I started deletion requests for many files for the same reason. Should I have used speedy deletion instead? Mathopara (talk) 04:43, 4 May 2026 (UTC)
- @Mathopara - do not worry. You are doing great. It is a good idea to use speedy deletion for very obvious cases. This is one of your examples File:Manuel24576850498.jpg. This contributor has only made a single contribution to Commons (uploading this picture) and as you can see here they not many other contributions to any other Wiki project Special:CentralAuth/Jmmartinezo. In such a case there is not really any need for a deletion discussion - it is an obvious case of the F10 criteria at Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion. You should nominate for deletion when the case is not obvious, or you don't know if a speedy criteria is properly met. I hope this helps --Askeuhd (talk) 05:54, 4 May 2026 (UTC)
File:Prof Dr Mustafa Deniz Yilmaz portrait.jpg — contesting CSD G10
Hi Askeuhd, thank you for reviewing my upload. I respectfully contest the G10 (advertisement) tag and would appreciate your re-evaluation.
Why this is not promotional:
- The subject, Mustafa Deniz Yılmaz, is an academic with an established Wikidata entity (created independently in 2019 and now enriched with OpenAlex ID, ORCID, employer, notable works, etc.).
- Bibliometric notability: h-index 20, i10-index 44, 138 indexed publications, 1,318+ citations independently verified via OpenAlex and Google Scholar.
- The portrait is intended for use in the biographical Wikipedia article currently in Articles for Creation review under w:en:WP:NACADEMIC criterion 1.
- I have disclosed paid editing per w:en:WP:PAID on my Wikipedia user talk page.
Action taken:
- I have simplified the file description to remove any clinic-related context that may have appeared promotional.
- The description now reads only: "Portrait of Mustafa Deniz Yılmaz, Turkish otolaryngologist."
If you still consider the file inappropriate after this revision, please let me know what specific changes would resolve your concern. Thank you for your volunteer work. Mesutadiguzel (talk) 20:26, 11 May 2026 (UTC)
- Hello Mesutadiguzel. If you want to challenge the speedy deletion tag, follow the instructions on the file page and create a deletion nomination. I strongly suggest you do not use AI/LLM for this purpose, it will not help your case. --Askeuhd (talk) 20:33, 11 May 2026 (UTC)
- Thanks for getting back. Fair point on the AI thing — I'll stop pushing. If the file ends up deleted, that's okay. I'm pausing the related Wikipedia work for now and going to approach it differently next time. Mesutadiguzel (talk) 21:01, 11 May 2026 (UTC)