User talk:RomanM82

This is a Wikimedia Commons user talk page.

This is not an article, file or the talk page of an article or file. If you find this page on any site other than the Wikimedia Commons you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user to whom this talk page belongs may have no personal affiliation with any site other than the Wikimedia Commons itself. The original page is located at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:RomanM82.

This is the user talk page of RomanM82, where you can send messages and comments to RomanM82.

  • Be polite.
  • Be friendly.
  • Assume good faith.
  • No personal attacks.
  • Please sign and date your entries by clicking on the appropriate button or by typing four tildes (~~~~) at the end.
  • Put new text under old text.
  • New to Wikimedia Commons? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers as soon as possible.
  • Click here to start a new topic.

Categorization

Hello RomanM82, noticing your edit. Just wanted to inform this is not a cook from the Netherlands but a person (model) acting like a cook. I'll remove the category and add the name of the person. cheers. Lotje (talk) 15:52, 3 February 2025 (UTC)

Hi Lotje, ok no problem. I also added category, as it is quite large series. RomanM82 (talk) 18:17, 3 February 2025 (UTC)

Transdev

Ahoj, dík za kategorizaci fotek z Orlové. K tomu autobusu: na lístcích se prezentují jako Transdev Slezsko a.s. - zřejmě nástupce 3ČSAD. Je to něco jiného než Transdev Morava s.r.o., nebo se jedná prostě o dceřinou společnost nebo něco podobného? Já jen, ze mě tam zaujala ta Morava.

Diky! Plánovací kalendář (talk) 07:42, 4 February 2025 (UTC)

Ahoj, díky za upozornění, máš pravdu, je to asi jiný subjekt. Moc se v těch autobusových dopravcích nevyznám. Fotky jsem překategorizoval a z článku dal pryč. RomanM82 (talk) 08:18, 4 February 2025 (UTC)
Já se v tom taky právě houby vyznám. Změnili to v Orlové nedávno. Plánovací kalendář (talk) 11:31, 4 February 2025 (UTC)
Jo a dik, ze mi delas poraden v uploadech. Ja to vzdycky kategorizuju a geolokuju měsíce po nahrani... Plánovací kalendář (talk) 18:56, 13 February 2025 (UTC)
Jj, to je pro mě takový bezmyšlenkový relax.--RomanM82 (talk) 20:54, 13 February 2025 (UTC)

Zrušení roků

No nevím jestli to byl dobrý nápad odstranit léta demolic PRIORu. Demolice sice byla ohlášená až na leden, ale začala už na podzim, takže až nahraji ty podzímní fotky, tak to budu muset dát do té stávající kategorie, protože zakládat to co jsem už jednou založil se mi fakt nechce. Juandev (talk) 18:52, 6 March 2025 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:1969 Phu Hoa & Qui Nhon.Khi thủy triều xuống thấp. (9680603246).jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（中国大陆） ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:1969 Phu Hoa & Qui Nhon.Khi thủy triều xuống thấp. (9680603246).jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:1969 Phu Hoa & Qui Nhon.Khi thủy triều xuống thấp. (9680603246).jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Leoboudv (talk) 22:23, 8 March 2025 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:1970 - Một nơi nào đó giữa Nha Trang và Qui Nhơn (9680607384).jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（中国大陆） ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:1970 - Một nơi nào đó giữa Nha Trang và Qui Nhơn (9680607384).jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:1970 - Một nơi nào đó giữa Nha Trang và Qui Nhơn (9680607384).jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Leoboudv (talk) 22:24, 8 March 2025 (UTC)

Zneužití autorství

Na oficiálních stránkách města Mikulov byla znežito autorství Vaší fotografie, ze které vystřihli část a PR specialista ji dal na úvodní stránku a za autora uvedl Elvyna Badelita, 2024. 37.48.58.15 20:36, 27 April 2025 (UTC)

Děkuji za upozornění, ale pokud myslíte pohled z Kozího hrádku, tak to není moje fotografie.--RomanM82 (talk) 16:12, 28 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Coat of the Vatican Secret Archives.gif

Pay attention to copyright
File:Coat of the Vatican Secret Archives.gif has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: This GIF (original image creation) was ripped directly from the source (a copyrighted website), as per what the uploader said in the upload summary
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Veverve (talk) 10:49, 17 May 2025 (UTC)

File:1969 tại Bệnh viện đa khoa tỉnh. (9680606426).jpg

Pay attention to copyright
File:1969 tại Bệnh viện đa khoa tỉnh. (9680606426).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: F4
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Oesterreicher12 (talk) 16:27, 6 September 2025 (UTC)

File:1969 Bong Son Hospital (9677370997).jpg

File:1969 Bong Son Hospital (9677370997).jpg has been nominated for deletion at
Commons:Deletion requests/File:1969 Bong Son Hospital (9677370997).jpg

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

—Matrix(!) ping onewhen replying {user - talk? - uselesscontributions} 12:36, 22 November 2025 (UTC)

File:1969 - làng tị nạn người Thượng (9680602234).jpg

File:1969 - làng tị nạn người Thượng (9680602234).jpg has been nominated for deletion at
Commons:Deletion requests/File:1969 - làng tị nạn người Thượng (9680602234).…

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Grand-Duc (talk) 22:39, 22 December 2025 (UTC)

I have uploaded this and other contested photos in good faith, license was checked and approved by Upload bot. It was literally dozen years ago and I don't really care at all now. Like what do you expect me to do with this? So I would really appreciate if you (and others) just delete these photos and stop cluttering my discussion page with this nonsense. Thank you. RomanM82 (talk) 23:38, 22 December 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (18 January 2026)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brno - park Lužánky, 2025-10, obr02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:29, 16 January 2026 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brno - Lidická 36, 2025-10, obr01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Tobias ToMar Maier 00:18, 16 January 2026 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brno - Bílá hora, památník dělnického hnutí, 2025-12, obr01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Tobias ToMar Maier 00:19, 16 January 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (20 January 2026)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moravské Knínice - kostel svaté Markéty, 2025-12, obr01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 22:48, 17 January 2026 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brno - Moravské náměstí, vánoční trhy 2025, obr07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:26, 18 January 2026 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zahrada (Kaly) - dům čp. 28, 2016-10, obr01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 22:49, 17 January 2026 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brno - park Lužánky, 2025-10, obr01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 22:50, 17 January 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:46, 20 January 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (22 January 2026)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brno - park Lužánky, 2025-10, obr09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 02:07, 20 January 2026 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brno - park Lužánky, 2025-10, obr03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 02:07, 20 January 2026 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brno - Štefánikova 1, palác Morgensternů, 2025-10, obr01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aciarium 16:46, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:44, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (06 March 2026)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Škoda 105 in Maršov, 2026-03, obr01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 16:46, 3 March 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

fotky mikulova

Zdravim, dovolil som si pouzit Vase fotky mikulova na stranke konferencie https://ceqip.eu/2026. V pripade, ze s tym nesuhlasite, alebo to nie je spravne, tak prosim dajte vediet. Ak nadidete mysou nad obrazok, tak sa ukaze autor. ~2026-22431-58 (talk) 11:25, 12 April 2026 (UTC)

ahoj, jasně, není problém. Díky za info. RomanM82 (talk) 11:32, 12 April 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (23 April 2026)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Velké Meziříčí - rozhledna Fajtův kopec, 2026-04, obr03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JackyM59 18:18, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 23 April 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (27 April 2026)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Velké Meziříčí - rozhledna Fajtův kopec, 2026-04, obr07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 05:39, 24 April 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (28 April 2026)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Velké Meziříčí - jižní kamenný viadukt, 2026-04, obr02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Romzig 20:58, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:47, 28 April 2026 (UTC)