User talk:Flo Beck
|
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
-- Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 13:23, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
File tagging File:Zigeuner-Saucen1.jpg
This media was probably deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Zigeuner-Saucen1.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Zigeuner-Saucen1.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request. |
File tagging File:Zigeuner-Saucen2.jpg
This media was probably deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Zigeuner-Saucen2.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Zigeuner-Saucen2.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Inspektion der Finanzdeputation
Bist du dir sicher bei Lappenberg? Ich fand die Ähnlichkeit auf beiden Fotos ziemlich überzeugend (die Nase!).--Hinnerk11 (talk) 21:57, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
- Ja 1.) F. A. Lappenberg war ab 1888 Senator, er wäre auch mit dem Titel Senator bezeichnet gewesen. 2.) zweitens er hatte eine Dr. Titel, der wäre mit aufgeführt worden. 3.) Es sind schon zwei Senatoren drauf je Deputation gab es einen, nur bei wichtigen Deputationen maximal 2 Senatoren. 4.) er wird nur als F. und nicht F. A. geführt.
Der andere Lappenberg im Bild war sein Bruder oder sein Cousin. Viele Grüße --Flo Beck (talk) 20:07, 16 April 2026 (UTC)