This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated contents should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Tuxyso 12:48, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --ArildV 11:41, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --ArildV 11:41, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --MB-one 19:13, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --MB-one 20:17, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Rangsiman Rome รังสิมันต์ โรม.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Rangsiman Rome รังสิมันต์ โรม.jpg]]).
If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.
If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support OK, although the detail level could be better. --C messier 20:30, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support I would have prefered a better bottom-right crop, but good enough for QI. --Benjism89 18:44, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Needs perspective correction. --C messier 20:25, 12 May 2024 (UTC) :Done --Chainwit. 02:52, 15 May 2024 (UTC) Now it is below the minimum size requirement. --C messier 20:00, 15 May 2024 (UTC) Done Whoops, silly me. Fixed. --Chainwit. 17:10, 21 May 2024 (UTC) Now there are some artifacts at the left edge of the image. --C messier 19:52, 22 May 2024 (UTC) Done Cropped out. Considered Fixed. --Chainwit. 15:15, 26 May 2024 (UTC) Support Good quality. --C messier 21:26, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 21:19, 2 August 2024 (UTC) Support Ok but please fix categorization. --Plozessor 04:14, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --ArildV 19:27, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --ArildV 08:01, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Very nice framing! --Plozessor 03:39, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --MB-one 09:42, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Ermell 18:52, 5 September 2024 (UTC) Support Good --FBilula 14:55, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Mosbatho 21:16, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Acroterion 02:36, 7 September 2024 (UTC) Support Good --FBilula 12:57, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --MB-one 18:49, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
CommentsGood quality --Michielverbeek 07:00, 15 September 2024 (UTC) Support Good --FBilula 12:51, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:13, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:10, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 01:44, 15 September 2024 (UTC) Support Bright --FBilula 12:51, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:23, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated contents should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Thi 21:32, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --C messier 19:15, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --C messier 18:44, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!
2022 Picture of the Year: Great Cormorant (Phalacrocorax carbo), Little Egret (Egretta garzetta) and Gadwall (Mareca strepera) in Nepal.
Dear Wikimedian,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2023 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighteenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and top 5% of most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
CommentsSupportSomehow OK. --PetarM 18:37, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --MB-one 14:27, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
You are receiving this message because we noticed that you previously voted in the Picture of the Year contest. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2023.
File:AC Sooklek (illustration crop) 01.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise,everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: The author, Prayoon Chanyavongs, died in 1992. The 50-year copyright period is still not over. So, the work is still subject to copyright.
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
File:AC Sooklek (illustration crop) 02.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise,everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: The author, Prayoon Chanyavongs, died in 1992. The 50-year copyright period is still not over. So, the work is still subject to copyright.
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
File:AC Sooklek (illustration crop) 03.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise,everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: The author, Prayoon Chanyavongs, died in 1992. The 50-year copyright period is still not over. So, the work is still subject to copyright.
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
File:AC Sooklek (illustration crop) 04.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise,everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: The author, Prayoon Chanyavongs, died in 1992. The 50-year copyright period is still not over. So, the work is still subject to copyright.
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
File:AC Sooklek (illustration crop) 05.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise,everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: The author, Prayoon Chanyavongs, died in 1992. The 50-year copyright period is still not over. So, the work is still subject to copyright.
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
File:AC ศุขเล็ก เด็กครึ่งนอกครึ่งใน (หน้า 01).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise,everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: The author, Prayoon Chanyavongs, died in 1992. The 50-year copyright period is still not over. So, the work is still subject to copyright.
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
File:AC ศุขเล็ก เด็กครึ่งนอกครึ่งใน (หน้า 02).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise,everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: The author, Prayoon Chanyavongs, died in 1992. The 50-year copyright period is still not over. So, the work is still subject to copyright.
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
File:AC ศุขเล็ก เด็กครึ่งนอกครึ่งใน (หน้า 03).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise,everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: The author, Prayoon Chanyavongs, died in 1992. The 50-year copyright period is still not over. So, the work is still subject to copyright.
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
File:1954 Echoes - เพลงชาวไร่.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise,everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: The author, Prayoon Chanyavongs, died in 1992. The 50-year copyright period is still not over. So, the work is still subject to copyright.
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated contents should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated contents should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
In case you don't find it through your watchlist: I added a fair amount of description to this photo, because the presence of the two very similar sculptures in the same museum (in the same room!) is potentially very confusing, and the particular angle you chose is one of the few that gives a good view of both and allows the viewer to compare and contrast. - Jmabel! talk 06:18, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
Oh my God thank you! Please feel free to add more info. Glad my photos were noticed. If you could, maybe you can too create a category for images of the same art pieces.
Again, thank you so much - mulțumesc mulț! - and glad my photos hold educational value. -- Chainwit. (talk) 13:16, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated contents should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Rbrechko 21:26, 14 February 2025 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Rbrechko 21:26, 14 February 2025 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Bgag 04:17, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Bgag 04:17, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
Hi. I noticed that your recent uploads related to yesterday's earthquake were of locations quite far apart, and some were lacking the usual Exif info, but all are listed as own work. Did you perhaps forget to edit the author/source information? --Paul_012 (talk) 06:51, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
My various friends took the photos and they wish to remain anonymous (ie, they are willing to have these photos be uploaded under my name, as my own work). They are also well aware of what Commons is, what CC licences are, etc. The exif info was lost likely because they took the images and sent directly on messenger apps. Regardless, I can ensure you these are not taken out of the blue from other usual CC sources (which is perhaps apparent by the fact that reverse image searches return nothing). Please feel free to ask more or guide me in case there is an issue in this regard. -- Chainwit. (talk) 09:48, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
I understand; that's more or less what I imagined. That said, it's not accurate to list such files as own work, which might lead to them be challenged. In such cases, the author should probably be listed as "Anonymous" and the source as "Provided to Chainwit. by the author, under the Creative Commons license". The licence tag should also use the {{cc-by-4.0}} template directly, rather than {{self|cc-by-4.0}} --Paul_012 (talk) 12:43, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
Oh, I see. Thank you! -- Chainwit. (talk) 14:40, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
@Chainwit.@Paul 012 "given by my friends", is not usually accepted. The friends (who are the de jure copyright holders if they were the ones who took the images) must send email correspondence to Wikimedia Commons through the email address provided at COM:VRTS. Spoken/oral agreements are usually not binding; licensing authorization must be in writing or via email. JWilz12345(Talk|Contributions) 13:26, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
Since these works are not previously published anywhere, there's nothing that a VRTS email is going to help prove. --Paul_012 (talk) 13:48, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
@Paul 012 it's not that the images were published elsewhere; rather, it's that the uploader is not the person who took the images. It is clearly indicated at COM:VRTS#Licensing images: when do I contact VRT?, as the very first reason why the uploader needs to tell the copyright holders to send permission correspondences to Wikimedia. "I have received permission from the original author (not me) to upload the file to Commons." This is regardless if the image/s were previously published elsewhere or not.
Therefore, Chainwit's friends must send emails to the VRTS team, for the reason the files as not being works of the uploader. (It would have been better if they created Wikimedia accounts and uploaded their images straight from their devices or drives [not from their social media platforms], but since, as Chainwit claimed, they want to remain anonymous, VRTS is the best option here.) JWilz12345(Talk|Contributions) 14:06, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
I'm querying the VRTS now at this generator, and obviously I've never done this before. What are to be filled at "Copyright holder" and "My authority" in this case? Thanks. -- Chainwit. (talk) 16:26, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
The release generator is intended for the author of the work, so here I am the copyright holder should be selected and your friend's name entered in the My name field. The generator will create a block of text that your friend can paste into an email and send to the VRTS address. --Paul_012 (talk) 13:14, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Will their names be shown publicly on submission (and on the file page) then? Thanks! -- Chainwit. (talk) 16:41, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
Adding a sentence to the generated message, saying that they wish for the work to be published anonymously, should take care of that. --Paul_012 (talk) 09:08, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
CommentsComment PC is needed. --Sebring12Hrs 20:29, 17 May 2025 (UTC) Support Good quality. Sorry, I'm nobody, but I don't need a computer to know this photo is good and beautiful. There may be some small burnt areas, but that's part of its identity. Very nice picture --Lmbuga 03:51, 18 May 2025 (UTC)
File:Thai rapper Milli.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise,everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator): Ginphuaktidfun.
I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion (shown above) or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 16:26, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Romzig 18:41, 18 May 2025 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment@Chainwit.: please, check if a small perpespective correction is needed. Good quality, otherwise. --Harlock81 08:10, 17 May 2025 (UTC) Done I've fixed it (wee bit on the left?) -- Chainwit. 18:34, 17 May 2025 (UTC) Support Good quality for me. Thanks. --Harlock81 17:42, 18 May 2025 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Ziv 09:37, 19 May 2025 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Lvova 10:39, 21 May 2025 (UTC)
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Lvova 22:04, 3 August 2025 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 19:11, 3 August 2025 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:57, 17 August 2025 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:57, 17 August 2025 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:57, 17 August 2025 (UTC)
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated contents should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2024 voting is open!
2023 Picture of the Year: Incense plays an important role in Vietnamese life. It is considered as a sacred bridge to connect the visible life of human beings and the world of heaven, earth, and gods. Photo taken in Quang Phu Cau village, on the outskirts of Hanoi, Vietnam. In this picture, incense sticks are being set out to dry, after being dipped in the incense solution.
Dear Wikimedian,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2024 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year is the nineteenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2024) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and top 5% of most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2023 Picture of the Year contest.
Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2024 voting is open!
Dear Wikimedian,
You are receiving this message because we noticed that you previously voted in the Picture of the Year contest. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2024) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2024.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
Date cannot be correct
photo-1photo-2
It is not possible that photo-2 is made 9 years after photo-1. Photo-2 must have been made many years before photo-1, maybe in the late 1800's. FredTC (talk) 08:47, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
I agree with your observation. The tricky part is the source book, published 2497 BE (1954 AD) did not state year nor date of photography. I believe the best approach now maybe 'unknown year' and 'at least before 1954'. I think this may apply to other photos from this book too. Thanks for bringing that up. -- Chainwit. (talk) 09:46, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
Other photo's I found, similar to photo-2, also have no dating. But in history texts I found that a famous monk (Kruba Srivichai?) started the restoration of the temple, making the photo at least 97 years old. FredTC (talk) 10:48, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
I cannot find any photographic sources as to the restoration work of Khruba Siwichai vs what probably would had to eventually be done by the state (Fine Arts Department, usually) ended up like. I would like to point out too that in Thai sources, as per my native experience, when mentioning "a restoration work" by "a monk"; the degree of "restorative" work can vary greatly - from removing overgrown plants to complete rebuilding. I personally would suggest "at least before" is the best and most factual for now. -- Chainwit. (talk) 14:30, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
I have granted autopatrol rights to you
Autopatrol given
Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have grantedautopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. GPSLeo (talk) 18:28, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Romzig 07:53, 23 January 2026 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --ArildV 10:08, 25 January 2026 (UTC)
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
File:ดร.อาจอง ชุมสาย ณ อยุธยา เสริมความรู้ด้านวิทยาศาสตร์แก่บุคลากร นิสิต มมส.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise,everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Picture taken by government official is not considered as Thai public domain
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated contents should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 13:34, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2025 voting is open!
2024 Picture of the Year:Mundari man polishing the horns of one of his Watusi cows using a mixture of cow urine and ash as a ritualistic and protective practice in a temporary cattle camp in Terekeka, South Sudan.
Dear Wikimedian,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2025 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year is the twentieth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favourite images featured on Commons during the last year (2025) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the top 5% of most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just five images to become the Picture of the Year.
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated contents should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 03:27, 19 April 2026 (UTC)
Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2025 voting is open!
Dear Wikimedian,
You are receiving this message because we noticed that you previously voted in the Picture of the Year contest. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favourite images featured on Commons during the last year (2025) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of five images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2025.
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated contents should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 03:36, 2 May 2026 (UTC)
Announcing the Winners of Picture of the Year 2025!
Hi everyone,
Wikimedia Commons is pleased to finally announce the winners of this year's Picture of the Year 2025 contest! We had some truly incredible finalists to choose from, but the community has spoken.
Here are your top three winning images:
First place: The aftermath of an Israeli airstrike in Gaza City on October 9, 2023, leaving widespread destruction in the Rimal area. Attribution: WAFA (Q2915969) / CC-BY-SA 3.0
Second place: Baby cape fur seal (Arctocephalus pusillus) sleeping at Cape cross, Namibia. Attribution: Giles Laurent / CC-BY-SA 4.0
Third place: A gigantic jet photographed from the International Space Station by astronaut Nichole Ayers. Attribution: public domain
You can view the full results and see where all your favorite images placed here: Full 2025 Results
I also want to highlight what an incredible turnout we had. In the second round, we saw a massive jump in both the number of users voting and the total votes cast. We had exactly 13,979 votes cast by 3,509 users! To put that in perspective, last year we had 7,403 votes from 2,837 users. It is amazing to see that level of growth and community engagement.
Thank you to everyone who voted, helped organize, and generally made the contest such a huge success this year!
_01.jpg)
_01.jpg)
_01.jpg)
_01.jpg)
_01.jpg)
_虎丘_-_img_02.jpg)
_-_img_4.jpg)
_-_Lăng_Đồng_Khánh_(2024_July)_-_img_06.jpg)
_-_Lăng_Đồng_Khánh_(2024_July)_-_img_05.jpg)
_-_img_02.jpg)
_-_img_04.jpg)
_-_Lăng_Đồng_Khánh_(2024_July)_-_img_22.jpg)
_-_img_02.jpg)
_-_img_01.jpg)
_-_img_01.jpg)
_-_img_11.jpg)
_-_img_01.jpg)
_-_img_01.jpg)
_-_img_09.jpg)
_-_Wat_Ban_Pa_วัดบ้านป่า_ไชโย_01.jpg)
_-_Wat_Chaiyo_Worawihan_วัดไชโยวรวิหาร_02.jpg)
_01.jpg)
_Reclining_Buddha_Wat_Khun_Inthapramun_วัดขุนอินทประมูล_-_img_17.jpg)
_Wat_Chulamuni_วัดจุฬามุนี_อ่างทอง_01.jpg)
_Wat_Chulamuni_วัดจุฬามุนี_อ่างทอง_03.jpg)
_-_Mausoleum_of_Emperor_Khải_Định_-_interior_-_img_14.jpg)
_02.jpg)
_Ming_Xiaoling_明孝陵_-_img_09.jpg)
_-_Điện_Kiến_Trung_-_Kien_Trung_Palace_-_img_01.jpg)
_02.jpg)
_Mausoleum_of_Sun_Yat_Sen_中山陵_-_img_01.jpg)
_-_img_10.jpg)
_Ming_Xiaoling_明孝陵_-_img_14.jpg)
_Wat_Chulamuni_วัดจุฬามุนี_อ่างทอง_02.jpg)
_Mausoleum_of_Sun_Yat_Sen_中山陵_-_img_08.jpg)
_-_Mausoleum_of_Emperor_Khải_Định_-_exterior_-_img_01.jpg)
_-_Meridian_Gate_-_Ngọ_Môn_(Hoàng_thành_Huế)_-_img_07.jpg)
_Ming_Xiaoling_-_Bao_Ding_Mound_宝顶_-_img_02.jpg)
_-_img_07.jpg)
_-_img_03.jpg)
_-_img_02.jpg)
.jpg)
_-_img_01.jpg)
_-_img_03.jpg)
_-_img_01.jpg)
_-_img_02.jpg)
_-_img_06.jpg)
_-_img_37.jpg)
_-_img_13.jpg)
_-_img_05.jpg)
_2024_-_img_02.jpg)
_Sufi_Shrine_(2025)_-_img_04.jpg)
_-_img_10.jpg)
_-_img_03.jpg)
_-_img_06.jpg)
_-_img_02.jpg)
_-_img_02.jpg)
_-_img_01.jpg)
_-_img.jpg)
_at_Pura_Tirta_Empul_(2025)_-_img_03.jpg)
_-_img_03.jpg)
_-_img_02.jpg)
_-_img_14.jpg)
_-_img_04.jpg)
_-_img_04.jpg)
_-_img_03.jpg)
_-_img_05.jpg)
_-_img_01.jpg)
_-_img_01.jpg)
_(2025)_-_img_07.jpg)
_-_img_05.jpg)
_-_img_02.jpg)
_-_img_01.jpg)
_of_Taman_Sari_Jogja_(2025)_-_img_02.jpg)
_-_img_15.jpg)
_-_img_01.jpg)
_-_img_01.jpg)
_-_img_07.jpg)
.jpg)
_Fatahillah_Square_(2025)_-_img_17.jpg)
_-_IMG_05.jpg)
_-_Bild_02.jpg)
_-_img_19.jpg)
_Str_Lucian_Blaga_nr_3_Timișoara_(2023)_-_img_08.jpg)
![](./File:"Eyes_of_Sibiu"_at_house_Strada_Ocnei_2,_Sibiu_(2023)_-_img_07.jpg)
_อุทัยและพูนทรัพย์_สนธิ.jpg)
_-_img_12.jpg)
_-_img_03.jpg)
_02.jpg?action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_03.jpg?action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_04.jpg?action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_01.jpg?action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_02.jpg?action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_03.jpg?action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_04.jpg?action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_05.jpg?action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_01.jpg?action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_02.jpg?action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_03.jpg?action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_04.jpg?action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_05.jpg?action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg?action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg?action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg?action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_img_03.jpg?action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_img_01.jpg?action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_img_02.jpg?action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_img_03.jpg?action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_img_04.jpg?action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_img_05.jpg?action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_img_06.jpg?action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_img_07.jpg?action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_img_08.jpg?action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_img_09.jpg?action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_img_10.jpg?action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg?action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_-_img_02.jpg?action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_img_02.jpg){kind=link}
_-_img_01.jpg?action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_img_03.jpg?action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_img_05.jpg?action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_img_06.jpg?action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_img_08.jpg?action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_img_09.jpg?action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_img_05.jpg?action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_img_05.jpg){kind=link}
_-_img_02.jpg?action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_img_02.jpg){kind=link}
_-_img_03.jpg?action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_img_03.jpg){kind=link}
_-_img_04.jpg?action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_img_04.jpg){kind=link}
_-_img_01.jpg?action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_img_01.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg?action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_-_IMG_01.jpg){kind=link}
_-_IMG_02.jpg){kind=link}
_-_IMG_03.jpg){kind=link}
_-_IMG_04.jpg){kind=link}
_-_IMG_05.jpg){kind=link}
_-_IMG_06.jpg){kind=link}
![File:București - Turnul Televiziunii Române "TVR" (2023).jpg](./File:București_-_Turnul_Televiziunii_Române_"TVR"_(2023).jpg?action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_img_04.jpg?action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_img_05.jpg?action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_img_07.jpg?action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_img_09.jpg?action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_img_10.jpg?action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_img_11.jpg?action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_img_12.jpg?action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_วัดพิพัฒน์มงคล_(2026)_-_img_33.jpg)
_-_img_03.jpg)
_-_main_hall.jpg)
_-_img_11.jpg)