Commons:FPC

Skip to current candidates Skip to current candidates

Featured picture candidates

Featured picture candidates are images that the community will vote on, to determine whether or not they will be highlighted as some of the finest on Commons. This page lists the candidates to become featured pictures. The picture of the day images are selected from featured pictures.

Old candidates for featured pictures are listed in the log pages and in the candidate archives. There are also chronological lists of featured pictures: 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025, 2026 and current month.

For another overview of our finest pictures, take a look at our annual picture of the year election.

Formal things

Nominating

Guidelines for nominators

Please read the complete guidelines before nominating.

This is a summary of what to look for when submitting and reviewing FP candidates:

  • Licensing – Images licensed with solely "GFDL" or "GFDL and an NC-only license" are not acceptable due the restrictions placed on re-use by these licenses.
  • Resolution – Raster images of lower resolution than 2 million pixels (pixels, not bytes) are typically rejected unless there are strong mitigating reasons. This does not apply to vector graphics (SVGs).
    • Graphics on Commons are not only viewed on conventional computer screens. They may be used in high-resolution print versions, and the images may be cropped to focus on portions of the image. See Commons:Why we need high resolution media for more information.
  • Scans – While not official policy, Help:Scanning provides advice on the preparation of various types of images that may be useful.
  • General quality – pictures being nominated should be of high technical quality.
  • Digital manipulations must not deceive the viewer. Digital manipulation for the purpose of correcting flaws in an image is generally acceptable, provided it is limited, well-done, and not intended to deceive.
    • For photographs, typical acceptable manipulations include cropping, perspective correction, sharpening/blurring, and color/exposure correction. More extensive manipulations, such as removal of distracting background elements, should be clearly described in the image text, by means of the {{Retouched picture}} template. Undescribed or mis-described manipulations which cause the main subject to be misrepresented are never acceptable. For images made from more than one photo, you can use the {{Panorama}} or {{Focus stacked image}} templates.
    • For historic images, acceptable manipulations might include digitally fixing rips, removal of stains, cleanup of dirt, and, for mass-produced artworks such as engravings, removal of flaws inherent to the particular reproduction, such as over-inking. Careful color adjustments may be used to bring out the original work from the signs of ageing, though care should be taken to restore a natural appearance. The original artistic intent should be considered when deciding whether it is appropriate to make a change. Edits to historic material should be documented in detail within the file description, and an unedited version should be uploaded and cross linked for comparison.
  • Value – our main goal is to feature most valuable pictures from all others. Pictures should be in some way special, so please be aware that:
    • almost all sunsets are aesthetically pleasing, and most such pictures are not in essence different from others,
    • night-shots are pretty but normally more details can be shown on pictures taken at daytime,
    • beautiful does not always mean valuable.
Artworks, illustrations, and historical documents

There are many different types of non-photographic media, including engravings, watercolors, paintings, etchings, and various others. Hence, it is difficult to set hard-and-fast guidelines. However, generally speaking, works can be divided into three types: Those that can be scanned, those that must be photographed, and those specifically created to illustrate a subject.

Works that must be photographed include most paintings, sculptures, works too delicate or too unique to allow them to be put on a scanner, and so on. For these, the requirements for photography, below, may be mostly followed; however, it should be noted that photographs which cut off part of the original painting are generally not considered featurable.

Works that may be scanned include most works created by processes that allow for mass distribution − for instance, illustrations published with novels. For these, it is generally accepted that a certain amount of extra manipulation is permissible to remove flaws inherent to one copy of the work, since the particular copy – of which hundreds, or even thousands of copies also exist – is not so important as the work itself.

Works created to serve a purpose include diagrams, scientific illustrations, and demonstrations of contemporary artistic styles. For these, the main requirement is that they serve their purpose well.

Provided the reproduction is of high quality, an artwork generally only needs one of the following four things to be featurable:

  • Notable in its own right: Works by major artists, or works that are otherwise notable, such as the subjects of a controversy.
  • Of high artistic merit: Works which, while not particularly well known, are nonetheless wonderful examples of their particular type or school of art.
  • Of high historic merit: The historical method values very early illustrations of scenes and events over later ones. Hence, a work of poor quality depicting a contemporaneous historical event can be nonetheless important, even if the artistic merit is relatively low. Likewise, scans or photographs of important documents – which may not be at all artistic – nonetheless may be highly valuable if the documents are historically significant. The reason for the image's historical importance should be briefly stated in the nomination, for those reviewers unfamiliar with the subject.
  • Of high illustrative merit: Works that illustrate or help explain notable subjects, for instance, illustrations of books, scientific subjects, or technical processes. The amount of artistic merit required for these will vary by subject, but, for instance, an illustration that makes the working of a complicated piece of machinery very clear need not be notable as a piece of artwork as well, whereas an illustration for a book might well be expected to reach much higher artistic standards.

Digital restorations must also be well documented. An unedited version of the image should be uploaded locally, when possible, and cross-linked from the file description page. Edit notes should be specified in detail, such as "Rotated and cropped. Dirt, scratches, and stains removed. Histogram adjusted and colors balanced."

Photographs

On the technical side, we have focus, exposure, composition, movement control and depth of field.

  • Focus – every important object in the picture should normally be sharp.
  • Exposure refers to the shutter diaphragm combination that renders an image with a tonal curve that ideally is able to represent in acceptable detail shadows and highlights within the image. This is called latitude. Images can be on the low side of the tonal curve (low range), the middle (middle range) or high side (upper range). Lack of shadow detail is not necessarily a negative characteristic. In fact, it can be part of the desired effect. Burned highlights in large areas are a distracting element.
  • Composition refers to the arrangement of the elements within the image. The "Rule of thirds" is one useful guideline. Horizons should almost never be placed in the middle, where they "cut" the image in half. Often, a horizon creating a top or bottom third of the space works better. The main idea is to use space to create a dynamic image.
    • Foreground and background – foreground and background objects may be distracting. You should check that something in front of the subject doesn't hide important elements and that something in background doesn't spoil the composition (for example that the streetlight doesn't "stand" on someone's head).
  • Movement control refers to the manner in which motion is represented in the image. Motion can be frozen or blurred. Neither one is better than the other. It is the intention of representation. Movement is relative within the objects of the image. For example, photographing a race car that appears frozen in relation to the background does not give us a sense of speed or motion, so technique dictates to represent the car in a frozen manner but with a blurred background, thus creating the sense of motion, this is called "panning". On the other hand, representing a basketball player in a high jump frozen in relation to everything else, due to the "unnatural" nature of the pose would be a good photograph.
  • Depth of field (DOF) refers to the area in focus in front of and beyond main subject. Depth of field is chosen according to the specific needs of every picture. Large or small DOF can either way add or subtract to the quality of the image. Low depth of field can be used to bring attention to the main subject, separating it from the general environment. High depth of field can be used to emphasize space. Short focal length lenses (wide angles) yield large DOF, and vice versa, long focal lenses (telephotos) have shallow DOF. Small apertures yield large DOF and conversely, large apertures yield shallow DOF.

On the graphic elements we have shape, volume, color, texture, perspective, balance, proportion, noise, etc.

  • Shape refers to the contour of the main subjects.
  • Volume refers to the three dimensional quality of the object. This is accomplished using side light. Contrary to general belief, front lighting is not the best light. It tends to flatten subject. Best light of day is early morning or late afternoon.
  • Color is important. Oversaturated colors are not good.
  • Texture refers to the quality of the surface of the subject. It is enhanced by side lighting… it is the "feel" to the touch.
  • Perspective refers to the "angle" accompanied by lines that disappear into a vanishing point that may or may not be inside the image.
  • Balance refers to the arrangement of subjects within the image that can either give equal weight or appear to be heavier on one side.
  • Proportion refers to the relation of size of objects in picture. Generally, we tend to represent small objects small in relation to others, but a good technique is to represent small objects large contrary to natural size relationship. For example, a small flower is given preponderance over a large mountain…. This is called inversion of scales.
Not all elements must be present. Some photographs can be judged on individual characteristics, that is, an image can be about color or texture, or color AND texture, etc.
  • Noise refers to unwanted corruption of color brightness and quality and can be caused by underexposure. It is not a desirable quality and can be grounds for opposition.
  • Symbolic meaning or relevance … Opinion wars can begin here … A bad picture of a very difficult subject is better than a good picture of an ordinary subject. A good picture of a difficult subject is an extraordinary photograph.
Images can be culturally biased by the photographer and/or the observer. The meaning of the image should be judged according to the cultural context of the image, not by the cultural context of the observer. An image "speaks" to people, and it has the capacity to evoke emotion such as tenderness, rage, rejection, happiness, sadness, etc. Good photographs are not limited to evoking pleasant sensations …

You will maximise the chances of your nominations succeeding if you read the complete guidelines before nominating.

Video and audio

Please nominate videos, sounds, music, PDFs, etc. at Commons:Featured media candidates.

Set nominations

If a group of images are thematically connected in a direct and obvious way, they can be nominated together as a set. A set should fall under one of the following types:

  • Faithful digital reproductions of works notable in their own right, which the original author clearly intended to be viewed as a set. Examples: pages in a pamphlet, crops (puzzle pieces) of a prohibitively large scan, a pair of pendant paintings. Not acceptable: Arbitrary selection of sample works by an artist.
  • A sequence of images showing the passage of time. They could depict frames of a moving/changing object or a static object during different times of day or different seasons. Examples: diagrams illustrating a process, steps of a dance, metamorphosis of an insect, maps/drawings/photos of the same subject over the years (frame of view should be more or less the same).
  • A group of images depicting the same subject from different viewpoints, preferably taken under the same lighting conditions when possible. Examples: Exterior and interior of a building, different facades of a building, different interior views, obverse and inverse of a banknote/coin. Not acceptable: A selection of different rooms in a skyscraper, the facade of a church plus an organ, any images of fundamentally different scopes.
  • A group of images which show all possible variations of a particular class of object. Examples: Male and female versions of an animal (preferably in the same setting), all known species of a genus. Not acceptable: A few breeds of cats (unless they share a defining characteristic and represent all possible examples of that).


Adding a new nomination

If you believe that you have found or created an image that could be considered valuable, with appropriate name, quality, image description, categories and licensing, then do the following.

Step 1: copy the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Your image filename.jpg. Then click on the "create new nomination" button.

All single files:

For renominations, simply add /2 after the filename. For example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Foo.jpg/2

All set nomination pages should begin "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/", e.g. "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/My Nomination".


Step 2: follow the instructions on the page that you are taken to, and save that page.

Step 3: manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list: Click here, and add the following line to the TOP of the nominations list:

{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Your image filename.jpg}}

Nominations are time-sensitive and for one-time use only. An automatic clock starts as soon as they are created. Do not create them in advance, save them for later or re-activate them.

Galleries and FP categories: Please add a gallery page and section heading from the list at Commons FP galleries. Write the code as Page name#Section heading. For example: Commons:Featured pictures/Sports#Individual sports An image will only appear ONE time in the galleries. After a successful nomination, the image can be placed in several of the Featured pictures categories.

Optional: if you are not the creator of the image, please notify them using {{subst:FPC-notice|Your image filename.jpg}} -- ~~~~.

Note: Do not add an 'Alternative' image when you create a nomination. Selecting the best image is part of the nomination process. Alternatives are for a different crop or post-processing of the original image, or a closely related image from the same photo session (limited to 1 per nomination), if they are suggested by voters. They should be added by, or at the request of, the nominator.

An 'Alternative' is created by adding a sub-section to the nomination page: ====Alternative==== [[File:Foo.jpg|300px]] *{{info}} A short description.

Voting

Editors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 100 constructive, stable edits on Commons (excluding user and talk pages) can vote. Everybody can vote for their own nominations. Anonymous (IP) votes are not allowed.

You may use the following templates:

  • {{Support}} ( Support),
  • {{Oppose}} ( Oppose),
  • {{Neutral}} ( Neutral),
  • {{Comment}} ( Comment),
  • {{Info}} ( Info),
  • {{Question}} ( Question),
  • {{Request}} ( Request).

You may indicate that the image has no chance of success with the template {{FPX|reason - ~~~~}}, where reason explains why the image is clearly unacceptable as a FP. The template can only be used when there are no support votes other than the one from the nominator.

A well-written review helps participants (photographers, nominators and reviewers) improve their skills by providing insight into the strengths and weaknesses of a picture. Explain your reasoning, especially when opposing a candidate (which has been carefully selected by the author/nominator). English is the most widely understood language on Commons, but any language may be used in your review. A helpful review will often reference one or more of the criteria listed above.

Unhelpful reasons for opposing include:

  • No reason
  • "I don't like it" and other empty assessments
  • "You can do better" and other criticisms of the author/nominator rather than the image

Remember also to put your signature (~~~~).

Over time, featured picture standards change. It may be decided that for some pictures which were formerly "good enough", this is no longer the case. This is for listing an image which you believe no longer deserves to be a featured picture. For these, vote:

Text to use Displays as Meaning
{{Keep}}  Keep It deserves to remain a featured picture.
{{Delist}}  Delist It does not deserve to be a featured picture anymore.

This can also be used for cases in which a previous version of an image was promoted to FP, but a newer version of the image has been made and is believed to be superior to the old version, e.g. a newly edited version of a photo or a new scan of a historical image. In particular, it is not intended for replacing older photos of a particular subject with newer photos of the same subject, or in any other case where the current FP and the proposed replacement are essentially different images. For these nominations, vote:

Text to use Displays as Meaning
{{Keep}}  Keep Do not replace the old image with the new image as a FP.
{{Delistandreplace}}  Delist and replace Replace the current FP with the proposed replacement.

If you believe that some picture no longer meets the criteria for FP, you can nominate it for delisting, copying the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box:


In the new delisting nomination page just created you should include:

  • Information on the origin of the image (creator, uploader);
  • A link to the original FP nomination (it will appear under "Links" on the image description page);
  • Your reasons for nominating the image and your username.

After that, you have to manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list.

As a courtesy, leave an informative note on the talk page(s) of the original creator, uploader(s), and nominator with a link to the delisting candidate. {{subst:FPC-notice-removal}} can be used for this purpose.

General rules

  1. The voting period is 9 complete days counted from the nomination. After the end of this period the result will be determined. Votes added on day 10 and after are not counted.
  2. Nominations by anonymous contributors are welcome.
  3. Contributions to discussion by anonymous contributors are welcome.
  4. Only registered contributors whose Commons accounts have at least 10 days and 100 constructive, stable edits on Commons (excluding user and talk pages) can vote. Exception: registered users can always vote in their own nominations no matter the account age and number of edits.
  5. Nominations do not count as votes. Support must be explicitly stated.
  6. Nominators and authors can withdraw their nominated pictures at any time. This is done by adding the following template: {{Withdraw}} ~~~~. Also, remember that if more than one version is nominated, you should explicitly state which version you are withdrawing.
  7. Remember, the goal of the Wikimedia Commons project is to provide a central repository for free images to be used by all Wikimedia projects, including possible future projects. This is not simply a repository for Wikipedia images, so images should not be judged here on their suitability for that project.
  8. Rules of the 5th day based on vote counts on day number 5 (day of nomination + 5):
    1. Pictures are speedy declined if they have fewer than two support votes.
    2. Pictures are speedy promoted if they have 10 support votes or more and no oppose votes. (Note that if it takes more than five days to reach this threshold, the picture can be promoted as soon as it is reached.) This does not apply to nominations containing at least one ‘Alternative’ image – because it is possible that another image can overtake the one in the lead during the last days, such nominations are never closed early.
    3. Once either speedy criterion is reached, the voting period is considered closed, and no more votes may be added.
  9. Pictures tagged {{FPX}} may be removed from the list 24 hours after the tag was applied, provided there are no support votes other than that of the nominator.
  10. Pictures tagged {{FPD}} (FP-Denied) may be removed from the list 24 hours after the tag was applied.
  11. Only two active nominations by the same user (that is, nominations under review and not yet closed) are allowed. The main purpose of this measure is to contribute to a better average quality of nominations, by driving nominators/creators to choose carefully the pictures presented to the forum.

Featuring and delisting rules

A candidate will become a featured picture in compliance with following conditions:

  1. Appropriate license (of course)
  2. At least seven  Support votes (or 7  Delist votes for a delist) at the end of nine days
  3. Ratio of supporting/opposing votes at least 2/1 (a two-thirds majority); same for delist/keep votes
  4. Two different versions of the same picture cannot both be featured, but only the one with higher level of support, as determined by the closer. Whenever the closer is not sure which version has consensus to be featured, they should attempt to contact the voters to clarify their opinions if not clear from the nomination page.
  5. Only two active delisting nominations per user, which is in addition to the limit of two active regular nominations.

The delisting rules are the same as those for FPs, with voting taking place over the same time period. The rule of the 5th day is applied to delisting candidates that have received no votes to delist, other than that of the proposer, by day 5.

The FPCBot handles the vote counting and closing in most cases, current exceptions are candidates containing multiple versions (“alternatives”) of the image as well as delist-and-replace nominations. Any experienced user may close the requests not handled by the bot. For instructions on how to close nominations, see Commons:Featured picture candidates/What to do after voting is finished. Also note that there is a manual review stage between when the bot has counted the votes and before the nomination is finally closed by the bot; this manual review can be done by any user familiar with the voting rules. Hint: Until summer 2025, the bot was also not able to process FPXed, FPDed and withdrawn nominations as well as delist nominations; this has been fixed, users do not need to close such nominations anymore.

Above all, be polite

Please don't forget that the image you are judging is somebody's work. Avoid using phrases like "it looks terrible" and "I hate it". If you must oppose, please do so with consideration. Also remember that your command of English might not be the same as someone else's. Choose your words with care.

Happy judging… and remember… all rules can be broken.

See also

Table of contents

List may contain works considered Not Safe for Work (nudity).

Nominators are requested, out of courtesy, to include the {{Nsfw}} template with such images. Users may select the gadget in user preferences "Deferred display of images tagged with {{Nsfw}} on COM:FPC" to enable the template's effect of hiding the image until selected.


Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache

File:Inland Sea 2025-05-02.jpg

Voting period ends on 19 May 2026 at 17:49:55 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Inland Sea

File:Wied il-Għasri 2025-05-05.jpg

Voting period ends on 19 May 2026 at 17:49:51 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Wied il-Għasri

 Comment excellent light, sharpness and composition. But some artefacts (rocks and water) in the left corner below prevents me of a support. do you think you could correct ?--Jebulon (talk) 19:13, 10 May 2026 (UTC)

  • ✓ Done: thank you for the feedback, I've touched up that corner, should look better now. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:19, 10 May 2026 (UTC)

File:Birds eye view of a paddy field near Bhutiachang, Udalguri District.jpg

Voting period ends on 19 May 2026 at 17:23:53 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Birds eye view of a paddy field near Bhutiachang, Udalguri District, Assam.

File:Edward Knight Collins, restored and colorized.jpg

Voting period ends on 19 May 2026 at 17:12:13 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Edward K.Collins I (5 August 1802 – 22 January 1878) was an American shipping magnate.
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People
  •  Info original daguerreotype created by Mathew Brady – uploaded, restored and colorized by User:Jebulon – nominated by Jebulon -- Jebulon (talk) 17:12, 10 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Edward Knight Collins was an important shipping builder in the United States, active around 1850, when this picture was taken. He died almost 150 years ago, but he looks alive ! I am proud enough of the result of restoration and colorization of the original daguerreotype by Mathew Brady, which was very damaged. Please have a look to the original for comparison :
    vignette
    vignette
This work was very difficult and tedious. For this restoration I used mainly GIMP, and FLOW.

-- Jebulon (talk) 17:12, 10 May 2026 (UTC)

  •  Support Impressive restauration, even more so if you consider the poor condition of the source! --Aciarium ⚒ (talk) 18:55, 10 May 2026 (UTC)
    Thank you ! Indeed, that’s why I put a vignette… Jebulon (talk) 19:03, 10 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support For technical quality. TheBritinator (talk) 20:04, 10 May 2026 (UTC)

File:Itsukushima-jinja torii at sunset, Miyajima, Japan, 20240816 1812 4144.jpg

Voting period ends on 19 May 2026 at 04:18:28 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Floating torii gate in Miyajima at sunset

File:DSC09516 Edge East Side Tower, Berlin, 2025-09.jpg

Voting period ends on 18 May 2026 at 22:48:37 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Worm's eye view of the Edge East Side Tower, with clouds reflecting in its glass facade. After its completion at the end of 2023, it (still) is the tallest multistory building of Berlin.
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo_techniques/Black_and_White#Building_exteriors
  •  Info Worm's eye view of the Edge East Side Tower, with clouds reflecting in its glass facade. After its completion at the end of 2023, it (still) is the tallest multistory building of Berlin. All by me. --Aciarium ⚒ (talk) 22:48, 9 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --Aciarium ⚒ (talk) 22:48, 9 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 05:24, 10 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:58, 10 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Somehow this only impressed me when I viewed it at full size on my monitor. In thumbnail I wasn't seeing it. But the contrasts in shades and shapes, accentuated by the choice of black and white, are really impressive. Cmao20 (talk) 13:05, 10 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support very impressive at full size !--Jebulon (talk) 17:17, 10 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:04, 10 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --Ezarateesteban 20:09, 10 May 2026 (UTC)

File:Stone lattice, Windsor, Ontario, 2026-05-09 02.jpg

Voting period ends on 18 May 2026 at 22:04:55 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Stone lattice, Windsor, Ontario
  • @Aciarium: Count me in, we could call it the Pattern Appreciation Society :) -- Radomianin (talk) 19:58, 10 May 2026 (UTC)

File:Ant on golden club (24749).jpg

Voting period ends on 18 May 2026 at 17:29:14 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Formica ant on golden club
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Plants#Family_:_Araceae_(Arum_family)
  •  Info Formica ant on golden club (Orontium aquaticum), a strange aquatic plant that's in the arum family but doesn't have a spathe. It's just a weirdly long, mostly bare spadix. Native to the eastern US but apparently tough to find. This one is on a pond in the Belleplain State Forest in New Jersey. Surprisingly few FPs of this plant family. all by — Rhododendrites talk |  17:29, 9 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support — Rhododendrites talk |  17:29, 9 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Cmao20 (talk) 19:14, 9 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 21:15, 9 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 22:05, 9 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Nice. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 05:26, 10 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Ant summit climber energy. -- Radomianin (talk) 14:21, 10 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support f/8 on macro 60mm is normal. --Mile (talk) 14:53, 10 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:11, 10 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Impressively crisp and sharp. Beautiful colors.--Jebulon (talk) 17:21, 10 May 2026 (UTC)

File:Louis XVI, avoit mis le Bonnet rouge, il avoit crié vive la nation, ... restored.jpg

Voting period ends on 18 May 2026 at 15:30:26 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A satirical 18th-century engraving depicting King Louis XVI of France during the revolutionary events of June 20, 1792
You're right @Charlesjsharp: I uploaded the true version, thanks! --Ezarateesteban 20:22, 9 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Comment - Crop is awfully tight, and there is some empty pixels on the corners. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 22:07, 9 May 2026 (UTC)
Fixed, thanks! --Ezarateesteban 22:52, 9 May 2026 (UTC)
I improved the restoration --Ezarateesteban 18:51, 10 May 2026 (UTC)

File:Profile portrait of Joseph Pulitzer.jpg

Voting period ends on 18 May 2026 at 14:48:45 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Profile portrait of Joseph Pulitzer facing left.

File:A micrograph showing four ostracods.jpg

Voting period ends on 18 May 2026 at 14:23:15 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Mandelbrot Set Image 94.png

Voting period ends on 18 May 2026 at 11:14:27 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Fragment of the Mandelbrot set. 100 Megapixels (10,000 x 10,000 px) with 8x SSAA. And resembling multiple eyes.

File:Blacktip reef shark (Carcharhinus melanopterus) Moorea 4.jpg

Voting period ends on 18 May 2026 at 14:28:19 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family : Carcharhinidae (Requiem Sharks)
  •  Info I totally agree with Sir David Attenborough’s comments about ‘exchanging a glance with a gorilla’. But as Michael Palin didn’t say during last night’s 100th birthday celebration at the Albert Hall, being face-to-face with a shark is something completely different. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:28, 9 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:28, 9 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  conditional support. Amazing capture and well-deserved VI. Charles, there is some posterization visible that could be fixed. JayCubby (talk) 14:42, 9 May 2026 (UTC)
     Comment There is, but I don't have the skills to get rid of it without losing details of the bits and pieces in the water. Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:18, 9 May 2026 (UTC)
     Question Very cute shark portrait :) Regarding the posterization: Are you sure you have exported the picture with 100 % quality? That might be the lowest-threshold solution to the problem. --Aciarium ⚒ (talk) 15:36, 9 May 2026 (UTC)
    Yes. Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:13, 9 May 2026 (UTC)
    @Charlesjsharp, I was able to reduce most of the posterization with a surface blur and slight noise addition. JPEGs are limited to 8 bits/channel, and it just might be that the blue water is perfect for banding to show. JayCubby (talk) 21:06, 9 May 2026 (UTC)
    Thank you very much. Could you overwrite my file please. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:54, 9 May 2026 (UTC)
    ✓ Done. File size increased fourfold :) JayCubby (talk) 22:49, 9 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Cool Cmao20 (talk) 19:12, 9 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Wow! --Yann (talk) 20:36, 9 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 22:09, 9 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Oppose: sorry, but the artifacts are still very obvious not only in the background, but on the shark as well. This is a stunning capture deserving much better post-processing. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 12:31, 10 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I cant open in on full, but even on those smaller i see artefacts from edition. --Mile (talk) 14:49, 10 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Although Jay's editing has provided significant improvement, I'm sadly still not convinced by quality (and on second look DoF). --Aciarium ⚒ (talk) 19:00, 10 May 2026 (UTC)
    ✓ Done Careless of me. I hadn't noticed that the white spots were not water debris on the RAW file, but as you have pointed out - processing artefacts. Grateful if you can have another look @JayCubby, @The Cosmonaut, @Mile, @Aciarium ⚒ . Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:43, 10 May 2026 (UTC)
    Definitely better. (I think they were water debris, just brought out by the sharpening program.) Given the photo is not easy to retake, I'm still supporting it. JayCubby (talk) 21:29, 10 May 2026 (UTC)

File:Curiosity Self-Portrait at 'Big Sky' Drilling Site.jpg

Voting period ends on 18 May 2026 at 05:51:13 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Self-portrait of the Curiosity rover on Mars

File:A Swirl of a Day for Phytoplankton (154086).jpg

Voting period ends on 18 May 2026 at 02:38:55 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A bloom of phytoplankton in the Gulf of Oman, as seen from Earth orbit. I believe that the small bright objects making trails over the bloom are ships.

File:Stolperstein Marburg Richard Hartmann Bahnhofstr 3 (2026).jpg

Voting period ends on 17 May 2026 at 22:47:04 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Stolperstein for Richard Hartmann embedded in tactile paving for visually impaired pedestrians, Bahnhofstraße 3, Marburg.

File:20171125 Day 8 studio24596.jpg

Voting period ends on 17 May 2026 at 21:59:11 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Congo Tales photograph by Pieter Henket

File:Krönungsmantel-Aachener-Domschatzkammer-2026.jpg

Voting period ends on 17 May 2026 at 21:24:15 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Cope and coronation robe known as Cappa Leonis (silver velvet, silk, gold and silver thread, gilded silver rosettes, 100 silver bells without clappers, pearls and precious stones; before 1349, altered 1520) in the Aachen Cathedral Treasury

File:Reliquar-Geißelstrick-Christi-Aachener-Domschatz-2026.jpg

Voting period ends on 17 May 2026 at 20:57:58 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Reliquary for the scourge of Christ, displayed at the Aachen Cathedral Treasury. Gilded silver, rock crystal, precious stones, pearls, antique and medieval engraved gems; Prague (?), circa 1380. photographic technique: focus stack, hand-held
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects#Jewellery_and_objects_of_precious_metals
  •  Info all by me -- Tuxyso (talk) 20:57, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Info Reliquary for the scourge of Christ, displayed at the Aachen Cathedral Treasury. Gilded silver, rock crystal, precious stones, pearls, antique and medieval engraved gems; Prague (?), circa 1380. photographic technique: focus stack, hand-held
  •  Support -- Tuxyso (talk) 20:57, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --Yann (talk) 08:37, 9 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Comment FP quality once the background masking is improved. You could use a smaller brush to get into the corners which are still green. Also too dark as is. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:36, 9 May 2026 (UTC)
    • ✓ Done Thanks for the hint, Charlesjsharp - I left some tiny areas unchanged to preserve to better preserve the back structure of the reliqery e.g. at the very top. Slightly brighended.
      Yann and Cmao20, hope it is still OK for you. --Tuxyso (talk) 21:09, 9 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Cmao20 (talk) 19:10, 9 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 22:11, 9 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:47, 10 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Comment, tending to oppose. Very beautiful artefact, but the masking job is uncomplete, the picture below is not thar sharp, and the whole object is noisy in my opinion. Could you improve ?--Jebulon (talk) 17:36, 10 May 2026 (UTC)
Thank you very much for your comment, Jebulon — and first of all, please feel free to oppose if you think that is appropriate.
Are you sure you were looking at the latest version of the image? I had several cache-related issues after uploading updates (Ctrl+Shift+R may help).
There are indeed a very small number of areas where I intentionally did not fully remove the background, for example in the uppermost tower window. Any further masking there causes the very delicate rear opening to lose too much precision and visibility. The same applies to a few other areas: additional masking consistently resulted in a noticeable degradation of the overall appearance.
Regarding the noise: this is always a matter of balance. I generally avoid aggressive noise reduction because, especially for such an important artefact, my priority is preserving the surface detail as accurately as possible. For example, please look at the fine details in the braided cord or the subtle details in the glass.
A few words about the shooting technique as well: I usually strongly underexpose highly reflective gold surfaces in order to avoid blown highlights — see the out-of-camera image here: https://ibb.co/vxMJTXDn
When lifting the shadows significantly during RAW processing, some level of noise becomes unavoidable, even at ISO 200. Since I am not allowed to use either a tripod or, even more so, a flash inside the museum, I shoot wide open (here: f/1.8) and choose the slowest shutter speed at which I can still reliably obtain sharp handheld images (here: 1/40 s). --Tuxyso (talk) 18:21, 10 May 2026 (UTC)
Thanks for explanation. I know how difficult are museum shots… Jebulon (talk) 18:50, 10 May 2026 (UTC)


  •  Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 17:55, 10 May 2026 (UTC)

File:M24 - VST - potw2237a.jpg

Voting period ends on 17 May 2026 at 20:42:39 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Barnard 92 and 93 in front of Sharpless 41, embedded in the Small Sagittarius Star Cloud.

File:Grnčarska radionica.jpg

Voting period ends on 17 May 2026 at 17:32:09 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Men at work in a pottery workshop in Smederevska Palanka, Serbia
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Work#Artisans_(craftspeople)
  •  Info Men at work in pottery workshop, Smederevska Palanka, Serbia. Created by Maja1407, nominated by -- Mile (talk) 17:32, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Info Part of 2026 Wiki Loves Folklore. Original shot was upscaled, maybe some thought 12 MPx (older Nikon D700) isn't enough, but we put back to original size and it is more than fine.
  •  Support -- Mile (talk) 17:32, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --Bijay Chaurasia (talk) 18:16, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Black and white works very well here. Yann (talk) 18:50, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support -- XRay 💬 19:44, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Very nice! --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 20:12, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support —Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 23:55, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --Llez (talk) 11:25, 9 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Cmao20 (talk) 19:09, 9 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 22:11, 9 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support A very good edit in terms of technical quality, especially compared to the initial version -- Jakubhal 04:13, 10 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:43, 10 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Very sharp and detailed. -Nayan j Nath (talk) 11:12, 10 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support -- Radomianin (talk) 14:23, 10 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support B&W is a very good choice for this picture. Excellent sharpness and technique !--Jebulon (talk) 17:38, 10 May 2026 (UTC)

File:Averau from Fedare at Passo Giau, Belluno, Veneto, Italy, 2025 October.jpg

Voting period ends on 17 May 2026 at 16:52:46 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Monte Averau
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Italy#Veneto
  •  Info One other FP featuring this mountain in the background. I think this one is better and adds something new. created by Ximonic – uploaded by Ximonic – nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 16:52, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 16:52, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support An imposing mountain with beautifully atmospheric light. -- Radomianin (talk) 18:07, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support A beautiful composition and (in my eyes) really painterly. One could object: ‘Too much in the shadow’; but it’s exactly the combination of beautiful golden light and soft gentle shadows which makes this image so painterly and atmospheric. – Aristeas (talk) 18:57, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Superb lighting and composition -- JackyM59 (talk) 19:03, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support For the briefest moment, I thought this was a painting. JayCubby (talk) 19:26, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Stunning! --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 20:13, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --Yann (talk) 21:31, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Very nice. TheBritinator (talk) 23:46, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support —Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 23:55, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support —Bruce1eetalk 08:34, 9 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --Llez (talk) 11:24, 9 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 16:43, 9 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Thank you for nominating my pic! :) If there is anything to change: i'm not a huge fan of skilifts, but then again they are part of a modern landscape ig. As photographing for informational purposes, of course I will not remove anything only because I think is unaesthetic. Lighting was the most striking thing here and with the shadows it did justice for the magnificent mountain and the beautiful foreground nature imo. The Dolomites are full of treasurous scenes around every corner. --Ximonic (talk) 22:05, 9 May 2026 (UTC)
  • You're very welcome. I think the light is very special in this picture and it's what it made it stand out when I was browsing QI for possible candidates. Cmao20 (talk) 00:28, 10 May 2026 (UTC)

File:004 Great horned owl under a Pink Ipê tree in Encontro das Águas State Park Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg

Voting period ends on 17 May 2026 at 16:52:52 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Great horned owl
  • You are very welcome. Cmao20 (talk) 17:24, 8 May 2026 (UTC)

File:MK&G Zweimanualiges Cembalo 2000.532.jpg

Voting period ends on 17 May 2026 at 15:59:17 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Harpsichord created by Pascal Taskin (1723–1793)
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Musical instruments
  •  Info created by Museum für Kunst und Gewerbe, uploaded and nominated by Yann
  •  Info Harpsichord created by Pascal Taskin (1723–1793)
  •  Support Professional quality image of an old and rare musical instrument. -- Yann (talk) 15:59, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Not really a fan of the cut-out-and-stick-on-a-white-background approach but the instrument is very interesting and photographed well. Cmao20 (talk) 16:37, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support exactly per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 18:58, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support —Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 23:54, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support per Cmao20 --Uoaei1 (talk) 07:04, 9 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --Llez (talk) 11:23, 9 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 22:12, 9 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:38, 10 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:12, 10 May 2026 (UTC)

File:Catedral de Santa Cecilia, Albi, Francia, 2023-01-07, DD 89-91 HDR.jpg

Voting period ends on 17 May 2026 at 14:53:22 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

High altar of the Saint Cecil Cathedral (Cathédrale Sainte-Cécile) in Albi, France.
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#France
  •  Info High altar of the Saint Cecil Cathedral (Cathédrale Sainte-Cécile) in Albi, France. The grim exterior of this resembles a fortress, but the interior is lavishly decorated with art and sculpture as you can appreciate in the choir. The UNESCO World Heritage Site was built between 1282 and 1480 in Southern French Gothic style. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 14:53, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 14:53, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Neutral Of course this is an excellent picture as usual from you, but I am not convinced by your current processing algorithm. See the image note I have added - the word next to 'St Jacques' is illegible and consists of vague scribbles, whereas if you look in the image history at the September 2023 and December 2023 versions of this image, the text is clearly visible as 'St Jacques Mineur', which is a considerable improvement because it identifies clearly who this saint is. This is characteristic of AI-based sharpening algorithms in programs such as Topaz, which interpolate detail and texture in order to improve overall quality. This can work wonders with images shot in low light with high ISO and high noise, but such algorithms are notoriously bad at reproducing the fidelity of text, because when they try to interpolate textures, they treat the fine detail of the text like it is part of the background texture, and reproduce a pattern that looks superficially like it without any care for what it actually says. I considered opposing for this reason but I concluded that an oppose would be unfriendly for an excellent contribution to the project; however, I would say that one of the joys of your church and cathedral pictures over the years is how well they reproduce fine details that can be appreciated at 100% zoom, and that this, and others that use AI-based sharpening, fall short on that front. Cmao20 (talk) 16:34, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
    +1 JayCubby (talk) 18:32, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
    Cmao20: Ok, thank you for the elaborated feedback. Point taken. I've improved the crop of an older version, I hope you like it better, FYI, JayCubby Poco a poco (talk) 20:50, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support IMHO FP now. --Berthold Werner (talk) 17:56, 9 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Strong support FP now. Cmao20 (talk) 19:08, 9 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --Yann (talk) 20:38, 9 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 22:13, 9 May 2026 (UTC)

File:Main Gate Chellah Rabat Nov25 A7CR 08921.jpg

Voting period ends on 17 May 2026 at 14:30:44 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The main gate of Chellah, Rabat, Morocco
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#Morocco
  •  Info The main gate of Chellah, completed in 1339 by Abu al-Hasan; part of a UNESCO World Heritag Site; Rabat, Morocco. Created by Tagooty – uploaded by Tagooty – nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 14:30, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support -- Tagooty (talk) 14:30, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Weak oppose Unfortunately I fear this may fall into the QI but not FP category for me. Although the image is good quality and surely very useful for the project, I miss outstanding light or composition. The lighting is quite harsh, with strong shadows, and the modern electrical boxes in the bottom left are distracting. In general for a symmetrical subject like this I think a symmetrical composition is most natural, although other options could work. Cmao20 (talk) 16:25, 8 May 2026 (UTC)

File:Wien - SPÖ-Maiaufmarsch (a).JPG

Voting period ends on 17 May 2026 at 10:53:57 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

1st of May demonstration in Vienna
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Other#Austria
  •  Info 1st of May demonstration of the SPÖ at Rathausplatz in Vienna. Created, uploaded and nominated by me -- Bwag (talk) 10:53, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Neutral -- Bwag (talk) 10:53, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Not with the cut tower. Yann (talk) 18:52, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
    This is not an architectural photograph; the focus is on documenting the 1st of May demonstration. -- Bwag (talk) 19:33, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
    Yes, I know, but still. Yann (talk) 21:32, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Weak oppose Tower cutting off is distracting. Perhaps a crop could improve this? TheBritinator (talk) 23:47, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I know the location quite well, also in regards of how difficult it is to get the entire facade of this high and wide town hall into a photo. I guess stitching would have been the way to go. --Aciarium ⚒ (talk) 19:03, 10 May 2026 (UTC)
    The subject is the 1st of May demonstration, not the town hall. Therefore, I see no need to create an "art photograph" like stitching. -- Bwag (talk) 20:29, 10 May 2026 (UTC)

File:Rolling Hills - Wolf Crossing, Arizona.jpg

Voting period ends on 17 May 2026 at 07:25:58 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  • It would definitely improve the picture. Cmao20 (talk) 19:07, 9 May 2026 (UTC)
  • Definitely a big improvement. I'm not sure the image quality is enough for FP but I do like the light so I struck my oppose. Cmao20 (talk) 13:00, 10 May 2026 (UTC)

File:Perchtoldsdorf Pfarrkirche Josefsfenster 01.jpg

Voting period ends on 17 May 2026 at 07:15:43 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Josefsfenster Perchtoldsdorf

File:OCHA OpT September 2023 map of the Gaza Strip.pdf

Voting period ends on 17 May 2026 at 02:50:08 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Maps#Maps of Asia
  •  Info created by the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs – uploaded by Onceinawhile – nominated by ★ -- ★ 02:50, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Great documentation! -- ★ 02:50, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --Yann (talk) 09:20, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Question Is this not way out of date? Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:29, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
    This is right before the recent Gaza war, so I don't think it's that old. ★ 13:16, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
    so what about the population numbers, for instance? Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:19, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
    What's wrong? ★ 15:06, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Chaotic illustration with lots of clutter and randomly placed info that distracts from the main map and compromises its usefulness to Wikimedia projects. Lots of biased phrasing. Per Charles, almost all the information on this map is now outdated, because many of these landmarks have been destroyed and the population figures are now inaccurate. Cmao20 (talk) 16:19, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
    Usefulness? It is added on several pages of several projects. ★ 17:53, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
  • Maybe it should be removed from them. Just because something is used doesn't make it useful. Cmao20 (talk) 17:58, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
    It's difficult to understand how a map created by a UN body and widely used is useless. ★ 18:23, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
  • It seems quite simple to me, unless you can come up with counterarguments to any of our points. Cmao20 (talk) 19:08, 9 May 2026 (UTC)
  • As you are finding it difficult to understand our criticisms, it might be useful for you to read about the current conflict in the area covered by the map. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:10, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Cmao20 --ToprakM ✉ 22:05, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry, but this map is honestly pretty poor. It crams far too much information that comes across as confusing and not useful for the sake of a wiki. TheBritinator (talk) 23:50, 8 May 2026 (UTC)

File:Basílica, Javier, Navarra, España, 2023-01-05, DD 86-88 HDR.jpg

Voting period ends on 16 May 2026 at 20:58:46 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Basilica, Xavier, Navarre, Spain.
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Spain
  •  Info Main alter of the basilica of Xavier, Navarre, Spain. The basilica belongs to the ensemble of the Castle of Xavier, built in the 10th century, although the basilica was not built until end of the 19th and beginning of the 20th century. Of eclectic style, the interior has a unique neogothic nave built with grey stone and white marble. The stained glass is a work of painter Marcelino Santamaría from Burgos. The main altar is an artistic decorative work, carved in stone inlaid with mosaics, bronzes and enamels by the Biais house in Paris. The tabernacle is located on a high relief that represents San Francisco baptizing and preaching. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 20:58, 7 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 20:58, 7 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Neutral I think there is something wrong with the light coming through the windows.--Famberhorst (talk) 04:29, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
  • Can you Famberhorst, please, elaborate, I'm not sure what problem are you seeing. Both windows? could you add a note? Poco a poco (talk) 07:19, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
  • My first reaction was that the light is perfectǃ Focusing in I couldn't see anything wrong. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:35, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
  • Explanation: it concerns both windows. To me, the light coming through is far too intense. The stained glass images on both windows are distorted and blown out at the edges. The blue glow shining through the windows is far too intense. In my opinion, the photo would have been much more beautiful if it had been taken at a different time. Of course, this is my personal opinion. Reading Charlesjsharp's comment, the photo will turn out fine.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:38, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Bright light shining into a church should be intense. I would oppose any attempt to turn down the brightness just to fit some definition of technical perfection (no blown highlights etc.) that would not be true to reality. Cmao20 (talk) 16:16, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 17:03, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support -- XRay 💬 19:40, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support —Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 23:54, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 22:15, 9 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support A.M.D.G. ! And my name is Xavier, this is my Holy Patron perinde ac cadaver. --Jebulon (talk) 17:51, 10 May 2026 (UTC)

File:Water strider (Gerridae sp.) Makiling.jpg

Voting period ends on 16 May 2026 at 19.01:37 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Water strider (Gerridae sp.)
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods#Family : Gerridae (Water striders)
  •  Info I have an open mind on this nomination. It is technically very weak, but we will see if the composition and lighting offset that. I Googled 'water strider' before nominating it. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 19.01, 7 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 19.01, 7 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --Ermell (talk) 19:13, 7 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Comment Charlesjsharp, I do like the compo on this, but I find it a bit overprocessed. There is a denoising artifact in the top-left, and the overall image is unnaturally smooth (I am not sure how much of it is a result of the focus stacking versus denoising). I trust that this is not upscaled? JayCubby (talk) 20:41, 7 May 2026 (UTC)
  • Yes, this is upscaled. I played with the denoise how much over-processing to use - it is not claiming to be anything more than a unique look at a tiny creature. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:01, 7 May 2026 (UTC)
    Charles, thank you for the info. How large was the non-upscaled version, and would you be willing to upload that? JayCubby (talk) 21:25, 7 May 2026 (UTC)
    I think it was x2. But the upscaling was done early in the process at the same time as RAW denoise, before stacking, lots of post-stacking processing and cleaning the debris on the water, so there isn't a ready-to-upload non-upscaled version. Happy to share the 7 RAW files though. I'm sure you could do a better processing job than meǃ Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:36, 7 May 2026 (UTC)
    CJS, that makes sense. I usually rely on in-camera stacking (and rarely use stacking these days). I'm always happy to play around with the RAWs, but Radomianin is better-equipped. JayCubby (talk) 22:23, 7 May 2026 (UTC)
  • JayCubby, thank you very much for the kind mention - I really appreciate it. I'd honestly love to try a fresh RAW development from the original files, especially since I personally feel that upscaling should generally not be accepted at FPC (and ideally not at QIC either), unless the upscaling itself is the subject being documented. Unfortunately I'm currently away from home and limited to mobile devices only, so I'm a bit restricted at the moment and probably not the best option for a quick turnaround. Also, I should admit that I unfortunately do not yet have practical experience with focus stacking itself, since my rather simple camera setup does not support that workflow. Perhaps another colleague with more stacking experience could help in the meantime. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 02:52, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
  • The in-camera focus-stacking on the Canon R6 is great to see if your photos have covered all the focus points you want, but is useless for final editing where stacking errors must be corrected before saving. I use Helicon Focus from Ukraine. Enlargement has been around since photography was invented, but in those says, detail was lost. Topaz Photo (previously Topaz Photo AI) has a 'High Fidelity' setting (with sliders set at 1) which allows simple enlargement with no loss of detail. The use of Topaz AI and Lighroom AI is permitted in many Wildlife Photography Competitions like the British Wildlife Photography Awards. FPC is not a competition of course, but reputable photo competitions do not allow the amount of cloning done by Commons photographers (flipping images, adding clouds, removing annoying sticks etc.) and cloning is frequently requested by voters. In this nomination I have removed dozens of floating bits and pieces and random reflections which would mean this would be fine in an 'photographic art' category, but would not be acceptable in a wildlife category. For many of us, having our images in Wikipedia/Wikidata/other Wikis is important and I think the level of cloning we do is about right, though without RAW files no one can see how honest we are... Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:17, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
  • Charles, thank you very much for the detailed explanation and for being so transparent about your workflow - that is genuinely appreciated. I also think the balance between careful cleanup and preserving documentary value is an important discussion for Commons, especially in the context of educational use across Wikimedia projects. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 08:27, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
  • If we're going to upscale things, I suppose an insect makes sense, but I could've sworn upscaling wasn't permitted at FPC? Am I not remembering correctly? — Rhododendrites talk |  12:48, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
  • According to Commons Photography Terms: In almost all cases, upsampling makes the file larger but adds no additional information. For this reason, images on Wikimedia Commons should, in general, not be upsampled. (Link) The underlying reason is that upscaling does not add any new image information, but only interpolates existing pixels. For FPC context, this is typically not considered a genuine quality improvement, but rather a technical alteration of the image's apparent resolution. -- Radomianin (talk) 18:01, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
  • Shame that your quote has not been updated since 2018. It is simply wrong in the world of AI. Wikipedia/Wikimedia is amazing, but many seldom-edited pages are out of date. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:24, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 14:19, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support I appreciate Charles's transparency about how this image was made and I think the results are sufficiently interesting and valuable for the project to waive the usual objection to upscaling in this case. Cmao20 (talk) 16:14, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support —Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 23:54, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Oppose: I have no objections to upscaling, but the background is too messy with artifacts. Would be happy to support if fixed. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 12:33, 10 May 2026 (UTC)

File:Red fox kits playing Bombay Hook (36455).jpg

Voting period ends on 16 May 2026 at 17:35:51 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

American red fox kits playing

File:Argiope lobata - tunisia.jpg

Voting period ends on 16 May 2026 at 08:30:25 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Gadwall (51156826697).jpg

Voting period ends on 16 May 2026 at 07:00:54 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gadwall gliding through the water

File:028 Capybara and Pink Ipê trees in Encontro das Águas State Park Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg

Voting period ends on 15 May 2026 at 22:45:59 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Capybara and Pink Ipê trees in Encontro das Águas State Park

File:021 Cocoi heron eating a fish in Encontro das Águas State Park Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg

Voting period ends on 15 May 2026 at 22:44:51 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Cocoi heron eating a fish in Encontro das Águas State Park

File:Camel's eye.jpg

Voting period ends on 15 May 2026 at 13:28:37 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Stiftskirche Herzogenburg Orgel 06.JPG (delist)

Voting period ends on 15 May 2026 at 11:31:47
SHORT DESCRIPTION

  •  Info My similar image File:Stiftskirche Herzogenburg Orgel 08.jpg has been recently promoted to FP, which is technically on a much better level than this one, which I have created in 2015. Therefore I propose to delist the older one (Original nomination).
  •  Delist --Uoaei1 (talk) 11:31, 6 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Delist --Yann (talk) 16:02, 6 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Question Delist is generally when it is an almost identical photo, especially immovable objects, as in this case, and they are also different frames, different compositions. I'm not sure if delist applies in this case, could someone help me clarify this question? --Wilfredor (talk) 18:59, 6 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Delist The old FP is fine, but the new one is much better Cmao20 (talk) 21:06, 6 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Delist per above. //shb (t • c) 00:17, 7 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Delist per Cmao20. --Ermell (talk) 19:22, 7 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Delist per above.--MZaplotnik(talk) 21:22, 9 May 2026 (UTC)

File:Grünblättriger Schwefelkopf (Hypholoma fasciculare) Bruderwald-20251031-RM-153709.jpg

Voting period ends on 15 May 2026 at 08:28:53 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Green-leaved sulfur head (Hypholoma fasciculare) in the Bruderwald forest in Bamberg

File:Arothron nigropunctatus - Wilhelma 03.jpg

Voting period ends on 15 May 2026 at 08:25:48 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Arothron nigropunctatus (Bloch & Schneider, 1801), Blackspotted puffer; Wilhelma, Stuttgart, Germany.
  •  Info Oooops, sorry, my mistake. New version in original size uploaded --Llez (talk) 15:18, 6 May 2026 (UTC)

File:Least sandpiper (52870202210).jpg

Voting period ends on 15 May 2026 at 06:37:10 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Least Sandpiper standing on a rock, staring intently
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes#Genus : Calidris
  •  Info created by Grayson Smith – uploaded by OptimusPrimeBot – nominated by Gbawden -- Gbawden (talk) 06:37, 6 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support -- Gbawden (talk) 06:37, 6 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Question Can you obtain EXIF data so we can see how the photographer achieved the sharp eye and the blurred water on the rock? Big lens, very slow shutter speed, small F number and a tripod? Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:39, 6 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Very noisy and low quality. Sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 13:28, 6 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --Selbymay (talk) 20:39, 6 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry but the depth of field is just too shallow for me to support, even though the picture is nicely composed. Cmao20 (talk) 21:04, 6 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Works for me. The image captures very well the elegance and skill with which the bird stands on the stone in the middle of the flowing water. The shallow depth of field makes this a portrait of the bird (yes, the eye is sharp) and works well with the beautiful soft rendering of the water, the stones, etc. – Aristeas (talk) 18:53, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Noisy, poor depth of field. TheBritinator (talk) 23:52, 8 May 2026 (UTC)

File:Sur En-Sent, Sculpture Fuck off light - 2013. Artwork by Klemens Cervenka. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 01.jpg

Voting period ends on 15 May 2026 at 04:40:09 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Sculptures outdoors
  •  InfoSur En/Sent, municipality of Scuol, canton of Graubünden. Sculpture Fuck off light - 2013. Artwork by Klemens Cervenka. Switzerland tries to connect art and nature in public spaces. This sculpture stands along a mountain path near Sur En in the canton of Graubünden, together with many others. The design and the refined proportions of this work of art really appeal to me.
    All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:40, 6 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:40, 6 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Question Did you take a photo of the other side by any chance? The other side is more interesting and has the braille which is an important aspect of the design. Full title of the artwork is Fuck off Light, it's black and white. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:52, 6 May 2026 (UTC)
  • Thank you for your comment: we chose this side because the artwork looks its best from this angle. You can also see this in the photos you refer to. We used the name you referred to as well! There was a sign by the artwork where you could scan in all the details about the artwork, which we also did. In summary, we found this to be the most beautiful perspective to do the artwork justice. Also with regard to the distribution of the surfaces--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:32, 6 May 2026 (UTC)
  • Note: I was present when this photo was taken. This is the only good side of the path where the artworks were displayed, and all the information could be read from that path. It was therefore the only good spot to take the photo, and it had nothing to do with Braille or anything like that.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:40, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
  • Sorry, I though the other side has the braille shown on the artist's website. His photo must be from another installation. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:07, 9 May 2026 (UTC)
  • Okay, but because of your confusing message, no one has voted for this photo anymore, and it probably won't happen now, even though the photo certainly would have had a good chance. That is very frustrating for Agnes.---Famberhorst (talk) 16:22, 9 May 2026 (UTC)- 15:48, 9 May 2026 (UTC)
  • I apologise for upsetting you both, but I don't see how you can blame me for not getting any votes. I have now checked that this is the same installation. Did you check the back side for the braille? Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:23, 9 May 2026 (UTC)
  • Let's leave the discussion; enough is enough.--Famberhorst (talk) 04:40, 10 May 2026 (UTC)

File:Parque Nacional dos Lençóis Maranhenses Paulo Cattelan (03).jpg

Voting period ends on 14 May 2026 at 14:17:14 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Lençóis Maranhenses National Park
  •  Comment @Aciarium 3 Cats are there, missing some special ? --Mile (talk) 09:04, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
  • @PetarM: Categories have been improved since my comment (and I also have added two more regarding the subject itself).  Support --Aciarium ⚒ (talk) 22:38, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --Yann (talk) 09:14, 7 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Юрий Д.К. 06:54, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --Mile (talk) 09:02, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 14:19, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support —Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 23:49, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 14:03, 9 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Oppose: regretfully, per Cmao20. The sky looks like a polarizing filter was used too aggressively. Additionally, it's rather noisy all over. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:10, 10 May 2026 (UTC)

Sansad Bhavan of Nepal

Voting period ends on 14 May 2026 at 09:21:16 (UTC)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page

  • Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Nepal
  •  Info This set shows the Sansad Bhavan of Nepal, International Convention Centre, in New Baneshwar, Kathmandu, before and after the Gen Z protest in Nepal. The first image records the building in its normal condition, while the second image shows visible fire and smoke damage after the protest. The two photographs are connected by the same subject, similar viewpoint, and documentary purpose, together presenting a historically important before-and-after record of Nepal’s parliament building. -- created by Bijay Chaurasia – uploaded by Bijay Chaurasia – nominated by Bijay Chaurasia -- Bijay Chaurasia (talk) 09:21, 5 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support -- Bijay Chaurasia (talk) 09:21, 5 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Strong support Extremely high illustrative value of an important event in Nepalese history. I would recommend submitting this as a valued image set as well. —brainandforce [yap] 11:40, 5 May 2026 (UTC)
    Valued image sets are not functioning now. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:48, 5 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Comment Image 1 needs perspective correction, and the WB needs to be adjusted --Uoaei1 (talk) 12:14, 5 May 2026 (UTC)
  • And adjusment in the crop so that both images are similar Poco a poco (talk) 18:19, 5 May 2026 (UTC)
  • Agree with Poco and Uoaei1 - there is FP potential here but this nomination would be improved by trying to match the crops between the two images much more closely. Cmao20 (talk) 01:04, 6 May 2026 (UTC)
    Thank you very much for the helpful review and suggestions. Based on the comments from @Poco a poco and @Uoaei1, I have uploaded a new version with perspective correction, white balance adjustment, and crop adjustment to make both images more visually similar. I hope the updated version addresses the concerns. Thank you again for the valuable feedback. -Bijay Chaurasia (talk) 06:51, 6 May 2026 (UTC)
     Support thanks for the fixes! UnpetitproleX (Talk) 20:15, 6 May 2026 (UTC)
    @Bijay Chaurasia and UnpetitproleX: Sorry, but the PC issue of the first image is  Not done ( Oppose until then). I have allowed myself to add some more categories to both files. --Aciarium ⚒ (talk) 08:09, 7 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Bijay, thanks for the fixes. Historic as per BaF. JayCubby (talk) 14:25, 6 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:53, 6 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Historically important and very well executed --Kritzolina (talk) 07:30, 7 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --Yann (talk) 09:14, 7 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:36, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support -- Bwag (talk) 11:18, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support —Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 23:49, 8 May 2026 (UTC)

File:Narayanhiti Palace-070A1259.jpg

Voting period ends on 14 May 2026 at 09:07:18 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:DSC07721 Palm House and Benches, Flower Gardens Hirschstetten, 2025-07.jpg

Voting period ends on 13 May 2026 at 19:28:42 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Benches in front of the Palm House of the Flower Gardens Hirschstetten, Vienna, Austria.
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Austria
  •  Info Benches in front of the Palm House of the Flower Gardens Hirschstetten, Vienna, Austria. All by me. --Aciarium ⚒ (talk) 19:28, 4 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support -- Aciarium ⚒ (talk) 19:28, 4 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Weak oppose High quality and generally good photo but I do find the partially cropped red sign on the left to be distracting, and the light is a little harsh. Cmao20 (talk) 01:01, 6 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Cmao. //shb (t • c) 04:45, 6 May 2026 (UTC)
    @Cmao20 and SHB2000: ✓ Done Thank you for your feedback. I have removed the distracting barrier on the left and reduced the overall contrast to not make the light seem as harsh; please have another look! --Aciarium ⚒ (talk) 22:15, 6 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Юрий Д.К. 06:50, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support A lovely composition of a peaceful place -- JackyM59 (talk) 18:59, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support —Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 23:48, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 14:02, 9 May 2026 (UTC)

File:Durbuy vu du jardin de l'anticlinal.jpg

Voting period ends on 13 May 2026 at 15:39:27 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The historic center of Durbuy in Belgium, seen from the Anticlinal rock garden
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Belgium
  •  Info created by JackyM59 – uploaded by JackyM59 – nominated by JackyM59 -- JackyM59 (talk) 15:39, 4 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support -- JackyM59 (talk) 15:39, 4 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:50, 4 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Comment Nice, but I would cut out the railing at right. Yann (talk) 16:33, 4 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Comment Thanks for the advice. I just cropped it and it's true that it highlights the historical monuments more while still maintaining a good foreground. -- JackyM59 (talk) 18:34, 4 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Painterly. Yann (talk) 21:53, 4 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Interesting building but hazy landscape and unappealing light. The lower right corner is also too busy in the composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:37, 6 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --Llez (talk) 08:05, 6 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Comment Nice busy picture with a lot to see but in the cropped version the foreground is much more embarrassing. I would have supported the original picture. --Selbymay (talk) 20:56, 6 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Юрий Д.К. 06:50, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 14:00, 9 May 2026 (UTC)

File:Galerida cristata - tunisia.jpg

Voting period ends on 13 May 2026 at 10:12:47 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Dülmen, Merfeld, Merfelder Bruch, Dülmener Wildpferde -- 2026 -- 0972.jpg

Voting period ends on 12 May 2026 at 13:17:21 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Dülmen wild horses in the Merfelder Bruch, Merfeld, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
  • I improved the sharpness a little bit. -- XRay 💬 19:07, 6 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --Llez (talk) 07:59, 6 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Poco; could be sharper. --Aciarium ⚒ (talk) 16:26, 6 May 2026 (UTC)
  • I should probably mention that I've since improved the sharpness. -- XRay 💬 19:18, 6 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Nice scene, I confess the eye discharge is distracting me a little --Wilfredor (talk) 19:05, 6 May 2026 (UTC)
  • As for the eye discharge, I had initially considered removing it digitally, but these are wild horses, and that’s just part of being a horse. -- XRay 💬 19:11, 6 May 2026 (UTC)
    I think it was good to leave it, it was not a criticism to remove it, I understand that it is part of a natural scene to see this, I appreciate your explanation and your courage in not editing it Wilfredor (talk) 19:26, 6 May 2026 (UTC)
  • In this context, I should perhaps mention that visitors are not allowed to touch (pet) or feed the horses. Contact with humans has been significantly reduced, and only a few photography groups are now permitted to get so close to the horses. -- XRay 💬 19:16, 6 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:50, 6 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --GRDN711 (talk) 04:30, 7 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support First, I didn't understand that these are wild horses. --Yann (talk) 09:16, 7 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 14:20, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Poetic, sensitive, and interesting composition. – Aristeas (talk) 18:44, 8 May 2026 (UTC)

File:Zepellin on flying display AERO Friedrichshafen 2025-0935.jpg

Voting period ends on 12 May 2026 at 12:36:36 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Zepellin on flying display at AERO Friedrichshafen 2025
  •  Support Yes, it is, and it's sufficiently better to get me to support too Cmao20 (talk) 10:56, 4 May 2026 (UTC)
Very much so. Thank you. JayCubby (talk) 12:30, 4 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 15:39, 5 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --Llez (talk) 07:59, 6 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Weak support I would like it more if it were sharper and had more contrast, but the composition is exciting—the wow factor exceeds the technicalities. --Aciarium ⚒ (talk) 16:29, 6 May 2026 (UTC)
    Hi Aciarium, thank you for your support. I uploaded a version with more contrast, maybe you can take a look -New York-air (talk) 19:17, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
    @New York-air: Thanks, it is a bit better now. Actually, the "problem" with the contrast comes from the lighting conditions while shooting (the motif is backlit) rather than from post processing. I still appreciate the effort. --Aciarium ⚒ (talk) 15:43, 9 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support —Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 23:45, 8 May 2026 (UTC)

File:Jungle Prinia in Saswad August 2025 by Tisha Mukherjee 02.jpg

Voting period ends on 12 May 2026 at 08:26:46 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Jungle Prinia (Prinia sylvatica)

File:Indian Mythical goddess makeup for performance (2).jpg

Voting period ends on 11 May 2026 at 20:52:06 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Indian Mythical goddess makeup for performance. There is a segment of society where people have their own dancing culture like folk and mythological dance. The photo is captured from the backstage, green room or front stage. India, July 2024. Part of Wiki Loves Folklore 2025. 
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Traditions
  •  Info Indian Mythical goddess makeup for performance. There is a segment of society where people have their own dancing culture like folk and mythological dance. The photo is captured from the backstage, green room or front stage. India, July 2024. Part of Wiki Loves Folklore 2025. Created by TAPAS KUMAR HALDER – uploaded by TAPAS KUMAR HALDER – nominated by Zquid -- Zquid (talk) 20:52, 2 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support -- Zquid (talk) 20:52, 2 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Impressive. --Yann (talk) 08:27, 3 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Wow! -New York-air (talk) 13:20, 3 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Colorful.--Ermell (talk) 14:08, 3 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 15:08, 3 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 21:41, 3 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:09, 4 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:45, 4 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Stunning --JackyM59 (talk) 16:16, 4 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Could discuss about compo/crop but fine anyway.--Mile (talk) 17:14, 4 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support--Paracel63 (talk) 21:27, 4 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support--AjayDas (talk) 04:26, 5 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Expressive and rich in color, with a convincingly chosen composition and crop. Unfortunately, the face and eyes are out of focus, which weakens the overall impact. -- Radomianin (talk) 07:11, 5 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I concur, the focus is too far in the back, probably around the earrings, furthermore I'm not sure about the slightly off-centered crop Poco a poco (talk) 18:41, 5 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Oppose -- E bailey (talk) 15:04, 6 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Very vibrant photo, exciting to look at. This is the kind of image you would see on OLED TVs in stores to show how well they are able to reproduce colors. However, like others, I do think the sharpness is a deal breaker. --Aciarium ⚒ (talk) 16:35, 6 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Low light conditions and non-static subject, juicy depth of field, not FF camera, for me the sharpness is acceptable due to these conditions --Wilfredor (talk) 19:20, 6 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Beautiful colors and funny portrait Юрий Д.К. 14:28, 7 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support For the beautiful and colorful composition. ★ 16:25, 7 May 2026 (UTC)

File:Procession du Mouled - Troupe stambéli sous arcades.jpg

Voting period ends on 11 May 2026 at 06:49:51 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Procession du Mouled - Troupe stambéli sous arcades
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/People#Traditions
  •  Info created by Atef Ouni – uploaded by Atef Ouni – nominated by Atef Ouni -- Atef Ouni (talk) 06:49, 2 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support -- Atef Ouni (talk) 06:49, 2 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Like your other nomination, this is a very interesting picture with an excellent idea for composition. You also caught just the right moment for the click and the crop here is good. Unfortunately the lighting is still far from ideal. In addition you again would have to fix the categories for this image to be a featured image. --Kritzolina (talk) 09:51, 2 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Comment I have filled in the correct author name and the correct gallery for you. It would be appreciated if you could try to do that in future nominations. All best, Cmao20 (talk) 14:35, 3 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support IMO very well. Yann (talk) 13:47, 4 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 20:06, 4 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support A well-captured and framed moment. Acroterion (talk) 00:06, 5 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Too grainy, I may change my vote if addressed Poco a poco (talk) 18:45, 5 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per others (too noisy). @Atef Ouni: I strongly suggest that you have a look into categorization for future nominations (also on QI)! --Aciarium ⚒ (talk) 07:19, 7 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support ★ 16:22, 7 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support per Acroterion. Light and framing work together here. Indeed a bit noisy, but IMHO not really irritating. – Aristeas (talk) 18:42, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Good capture, but really noisy... So sorry !--Jebulon (talk) 17:56, 10 May 2026 (UTC)

File:Christ at the Column by Antonello da Messina (Louvre RF 1992-10).jpg

Voting period ends on 11 May 2026 at 02:53:58 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Christ at the Column by Antonello da Messina

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 May 2026 at 18:42:20 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#India
  •  Info Vaishnava Temple, also known as the Brick Temple, located within the Konark Sun Temple complex in the Puri district of Odisha, India. The temple was excavated relatively recently, in 1956, during a sand clearance operation. Unlike the primary stone structures of the main Sun Temple, this small temple is constructed primarily of bricks. It is situated in the southwest corner of the Konark temple compound, near the Chhayadevi temple. All by --Joydeep (Talk) 18:42, 1 May 2026 (UTC)

 Abstain As author --Joydeep (Talk) 18:42, 1 May 2026 (UTC)

  •  Support There is enough wow in the lighting, the textures of the brickwork, and the historical interest of the subject for me to want to feature this. Cmao20 (talk) 14:25, 3 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:38, 3 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 04:47, 4 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry, I fail to see anything extraordinary here. Poco a poco (talk) 18:45, 5 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Nice image for me. Maybe the photo could have been a bit wider.--Famberhorst (talk) 04:45, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
Unconfirmed results: (info)
Result: 4 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /FPCBot (talk) 21:07, 10 May 2026 (UTC)
Category:Featured picture candidates awaiting closure review

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 May 2026 at 17:53:13 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Girl wearing traditional dress and sitting by the Orthodox church, Serbia.
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Sitting_people
  •  Info Girl wearing traditional dress and sitting by the Orthodox church, Serbia. Author: Stojanov1234, nomination by -- Mile (talk) 17:53, 1 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support -- Mile (talk) 17:53, 1 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 18:06, 1 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --Yann (talk) 18:30, 1 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support The image description needs fixing (the English label has a Russian description). --Wilfredor (talk) 03:14, 2 May 2026 (UTC)
    •  Comment It is Serbian. Picture is a part of Wiki loves Folklore Serbia. Changing names would bring problem in voting system. Mile (talk) 03:51, 2 May 2026 (UTC)
      •  Comment Changing the filename would indeed cause problems. However I guess Wilfredor just referred to the label of the description Лепота и традиција Босилеградског краја which was labelled as ‘English’ but is Serbian. I have fixed this. Of course it would be good to expand the Serbian description a bit (and to add a longer English description, too), because the description just means something like ‘The beauty and tradition of the Bosilegrad region’, and that does not tell us much about what exactly we see in this photo. Example: “A young woman wearing the traditional festive dress of the Bosilegrad region and sitting by the Orthodox church in <name of the place>.” would make already make a more useful description. – Aristeas (talk) 18:44, 2 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Comment Added EN description. What kind of wear she has i asked the author, if i get answer i can add that too. And location (church). --Mile (talk) 21:13, 2 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Comment Added one more Cat. Same Cat added to other Folklore. --Mile (talk) 19:36, 6 May 2026 (UTC)
Unconfirmed results: (info)
Result: 13 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 21:07, 10 May 2026 (UTC)
Category:Featured picture candidates awaiting closure review

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 May 2026 at 17:48:49 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Stormy sunset over La Gomera
Unconfirmed results: (info)
Result: 9 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 21:06, 10 May 2026 (UTC)
Category:Featured picture candidates awaiting closure review

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 May 2026 at 17:48:37 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Llano de Ucanca panorama
✓ Done @Llez: good catch! I trimmed the unsharp parts of a few frames and restitched. The areas you've marked look better now, I think. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:23, 3 May 2026 (UTC)
 Support --Llez (talk) 05:18, 4 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Very impressive view and I'm not personally seing any significant sharpness issue especially considering high resolution Cmao20 (talk) 14:24, 3 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 15:09, 3 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --Yann (talk) 16:12, 3 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 19:45, 3 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:26, 4 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:53, 4 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry, but I'm not convinced by the compo. When the image was loading I was hoping to find some nice pattern (those bushes in the arid floor) in the bottom, but it's cropped. Otherwise the summit of Teide is not visible and otherwise I see a bunch of rocks. Detail is not the best either. Poco a poco (talk) 18:49, 5 May 2026 (UTC)
Unconfirmed results: (info)
Result: 8 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 21:06, 10 May 2026 (UTC)
Category:Featured picture candidates awaiting closure review

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 May 2026 at 15:37:28 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Giant Wild Goose Pagoda, Xi'an, May, 2018
Unconfirmed results: (info)
Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 21:06, 10 May 2026 (UTC)
Category:Featured picture candidates awaiting closure review

Timetable (day 5 after nomination)

Tue 05 May → Sun 10 May
Wed 06 May → Mon 11 May
Thu 07 May → Tue 12 May
Fri 08 May → Wed 13 May
Sat 09 May → Thu 14 May
Sun 10 May → Fri 15 May

Timetable (day 9 after nomination, last day of voting)

Fri 01 May → Sun 10 May
Sat 02 May → Mon 11 May
Sun 03 May → Tue 12 May
Mon 04 May → Wed 13 May
Tue 05 May → Thu 14 May
Wed 06 May → Fri 15 May
Thu 07 May → Sat 16 May
Fri 08 May → Sun 17 May
Sat 09 May → Mon 18 May
Sun 10 May → Tue 19 May

Closing nominations manually

The following description explains how to close nominations manually. Normally this is not necessary, as FPCBot takes care of counting the votes, closing and archiving the nominations. When the Bot has counted the votes, a user needs to check and approve the result; everything else is done by the Bot. Therefore, the following instructions are normally only needed for delist-and-replace nominations that the Bot cannot (yet) process, and in case the Bot malfunctions. The closing can be done by any experienced user. If you need help, just ask on the FPC talk page.

  1. On Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the nomination, then [edit].
    • Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line):
      {{FPC-results-reviewed|support=x|oppose=x|neutral=x|featured=(“yes” or “no”)|gallery=xxx|sig=~~~~}}
      (You can leave the gallery parameter blank if the image was not featured. If the nomination contains alternatives, you must add the alternative=xxx parameter with the name of the selected image between the gallery and the sig parameter. See {{FPC-results-reviewed}} for examples and more explanations.)
    • Edit the title of the nomination and add featured or not featured after the link – for example:
      === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
      becomes
      === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], featured ===
    • Save your edit.
  2. If it is featured:
    1. Add the picture to the list of the four most recently featured pictures of an appropriate gallery of Commons:Featured pictures, list as the first one and delete the last one, so that the number is four again.
    2. Add the picture to the appropriate featured picture gallery page and section. Click on the most appropriate link beneath where you just added it as one of the four images on Commons:Featured pictures, list to find the gallery page, and search for the correct section. (An image should only appear ONE time in the galleries. After a successful nomination, the image can be placed in several of the Featured pictures categories.)
    3. Add the template {{Assessments|featured=1}} to the image description page.
      • If it was an alternative image or part of a set nomination, use the com-nom parameter. For example, if File:Foo.jpg was promoted in the nomination Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bar.jpg, use {{Assessments|featured=1|com-nom=Bar.jpg}} You also need the com-nom parameter if the image gets renamed.
      • If the image is already featured on another Wikipedia, just add featured=1 to the {{Assessments}} template. For instance, {{Assessments|enwiki=1}} becomes {{Assessments|enwiki=1|featured=1}}
    4. Head over to the structured data for the image and add the “Commons quality assessment” claim (P6731) “Wikimedia Commons featured picture” (Q63348049).
    5. Add the picture to the chronological archives of featured pictures. Place it at the end of the gallery using this format:
      File:xxxxx.jpg|# '''Title'''<br>created by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], uploaded by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]<br> {{s|xxx}}, {{o|xxx}}, {{n|xxx}}
      • The # should be replaced by 1 for the first image nominated that month, and counts up after that. Have a look at the other entries on that page for examples. (If you want to do everything perfectly, link that number to the nomination subpage, just like FPCBot does this. It allows users to jump directly to the nomination.)
      • The Title should be replaced by the bare name of the featured picture, without the ‘File:’ or the file extension (such as .jpg .tif .svg).
      • The x in {{s|x}}, {{o|x}}, {{n|x}} should be replaced by the count of support, oppose, and neutral votes respectively.
      • If the nomination was a set nomination, use this format:
        File:xxxxx.jpg|# '''Set: Title (Z files)'''<br>created by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], uploaded by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]<br> {{s|x}}, {{o|x}}, {{n|x}}
        Replace the Z in (Z files) by the count of images in the set, and use the name of the first image from the set instead of File:xxxxx.jpg and for the title.
    6. Add == FP promotion ==
      {{FPpromotion|File:XXXXX.jpg}} to the talk page of the nominator. For set nominations, use:
      == Set Promoted to FP ==
      <gallery>
      File:XXXXXX.jpg
      File:XXXXXX.jpg
      </gallery>
      {{FPpromotionSet2|YYYYY}}      , using the names of the set files instead of the XXXXXX and the title of the set instead of YYYYY.
    7. Add == FP promotion ==
      {{FPpromotedUploader|File:XXXXX.jpg}} to the talk page of the user who has uploaded the image, if that user is not the same as the nominator.
    8. Add == FP promotion ==
      {{FPpromotedCreator|File:XXXXX.jpg}} to the talk page of the creator, if the author is a different Commons user than nominator and uploader.
  3. Add candidate archive categories to the nomination so that people can easily find and evaluate past nominations (this applies also to unsuccessful, {{FPX}}-d, {{FPD}}-d and {{Withdraw}}-n nominations). It’s best practice to wrap all these categories in a <noinclude>...</noinclude> section because they apply only to the nomination itself, not to the log page etc. which transclude it. You need three or four categories:
    1. A category for the month and year, like Category:May 2026 featured picture candidates for the current month.
    2. A category for the type and result of the nomination, like Category:2026 successful candidates for featured picture status; replace “successful” by “unsuccessful”, “FPXed”, “FPDed” or “withdrawn”, depending on the final result of the nomination (see the supercategory for common values).
    3. A category for the subject of the nomination, like Category:2026 featured picture candidates of plants. Replace “plants” by one of the possible subject keywords like “animals”, “architecture”, etc.; see the base category for all common keywords. Basically the subject keywords correspond to the first part of the gallery link.
    4. If the nomination is a set nomination, add Category:2026 featured picture set nominations.
  4. As the last step (whether the image is featured or not; including {{FPX}}-d, {{FPD}}-d and {{Withdraw}}-n nominations), you have to move the transclusion (the {{ }} and the text within those) of the nomination to the current log page.
    • To find the current log page, visit the first page of the log for this month. If the header of that page contains a link with the text “Next part of this month”, the log for this month has been split into several parts because it contains too many entries. Click on the “Next part …” link and repeat this until you reach a page where the header does not offer a “Next part …” link; that’s the last and current log page.
    • Now open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination you are closing. It will be of the form: {{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}} or: {{Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/XXXXX}}.
    • Copy that line to the bottom of the current log page and save that page. Then remove the same line from the candidate list and save that page.

Closing a delisting nomination

  1. On Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
    Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line):
    {{FPC-delist-results-reviewed|delist=x|keep=x|neutral=x|delisted=yes/no|sig=~~~~}}
    (for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/File:Ensifera ensifera (22271195865).jpg)
  2. Edit the title of the delisting nomination and add delisted or not delisted after the image title; for example:
    === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
    becomes
    === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], delisted ===
  3. Add candidate archive categories to the nomination; this works the same way as described above for featured picture nominations. The only difference is that the category for type and status must be of the form Category:2026 successful candidates for delisting from featured picture status, or Category:2026 successful candidates for delisting and replacing featured pictures if this is a delist-and-replace nomination. Substitute “unsuccessful”, “FPXed”, “FPDed” or “withdrawn” for “successful”, depending on the final result of the nomination.
  4. Move the transclusion of the nomination to the current log page; please see above for an explanation how to find the current log page and how to move the nomination to it.
  5. If the outcome was not delisted, stop here. If it is delisted:
    1. Remove the picture from Commons:Featured pictures, list and any subpages.
    2. Edit the picture's description as follows:
    3. Add a delisting-comment to the original entry in the chronological archive of featured pictures in bold-face, e. g. delisted 2007-07-19 (1–6) with (1–6) meaning 1 keep and 6 delist votes (change as appropriate). The picture must not be removed from the chronological archives.
  6. If this is a Delist and Replace, the delisting and promotion must both be done manually. To do the promotion, follow the steps in the section above. Note that the assessment tag on the file page and the promotion tag on the nominator's talk page won't pick up the /replace subpage that these nominations use.

Archiving a withdrawn nomination

If a nomination has been withdrawn by the nominator by using {{Withdraw}} or is cancelled with {{FPX}} or {{FPD}}, wait 24 hours after the nomination was last edited. If there has been no objection to the cancellation within this time, the nomination can simply be archived. Just add candidate archive categories to the nomination itself, then move the transclusion of the nomination to the current log page; please see above for an explanation how to find the current log page and how to move the nomination to it.

Category:Featured pictures#%20 Category:Commons projects-en#Pictures,%20Pictures%20candidates,%20Featured