User talk:Gower


Happy holidays! * 2026 !

  * Happy Holidays! * 
  • Merry Christmas and a happy New Year!
  • ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
  • Joyeux Noël et bonne année!
  • Frohe Weihnachten und ein glückliches Neues Jahr!
  • Wesołych Świąt i Szczęśliwego Nowego Roku!
  • Щасливого Різдва i з Новим роком!
  • Boldog karácsonyt és boldog új évet!
  • Καλά Χριστούγεννα και καλή χρονιά!

   -- George Chernilevsky talk 14:42, 21 December 2025 (UTC)  

Happy holidays!

Merry Christmas and warm wishes for a joyful, healthy, and peaceful New Year 2026!

-- Radomianin (talk) 19:14, 21 December 2025 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Main building of Management of Zamoyski Estate complex in Zwierzyniec, facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Elisabeth church in Chorzów, front view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:23, 22 December 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (22 December 2025)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bytom Żabie Doły hałda 2019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Igor123121 19:24, 19 December 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chorzów school Dąbrowskiego 34 2020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JackyM59 17:40, 19 December 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 22 December 2025 (UTC)

Bonnes Fêtes

It's a pleasure working with you. You've made a big difference to VI. Your feedback is very helpful. I'd like to offer one suggestion: your images are a bit somber; perhaps you could add a touch more color and light.

Happy holidays to you and your family. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:17, 22 December 2025 (UTC)

Happy holidays and best wishes for 2026!

✨ Happy Holidays
Gower!
🎄 Merry Christmas!
🎉 Best wishes for 2026!
-- Giles Laurent (talk) 19:46, 22 December 2025 (UTC)


Valued Image Promoted

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
49A building in Gdańsk, interior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
19 Poniatowskiego Street in Katowice, facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
4 Kasprowicza Square in Katowice, facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Nicholas church in Tarnowskie Góry, front view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of SS. Peter and Paul in Katowice, facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
22 Wolności Square in Puck, facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 23 December 2025 (UTC)

Happy holidays!

Warm greetings from Rio Grande do Sul! heylenny (talk/edits) 02:21, 23 December 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (23 December 2025)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ruda Śląska kościół św. Pawła aerial W 2025.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Pdanese 15:02, 20 December 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Toruń Bydgoska 5 2019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Igor123121 15:55, 20 December 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 23 December 2025 (UTC)

Merry Christmas ...

* ...and a happy new year!, Gower! *
  • ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
  • Joyeux Noël et bonne année!
  • Frohe Weihnachten und ein glückliches Neues Jahr!
  • Wesołych Świąt i Szczęśliwego Nowego Roku!
  • Счастливого Рождества и c Новым годом!
  • Щасливого Різдва i З Новим роком!
  • Boldog karácsonyt és boldog új évet!
  • 聖誕快樂,新年快樂!
  • Καλά Χριστούγεννα και καλή χρονιά!


Ermell (talk) 11:17, 23 December 2025 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manor in Jarnołtówek, front view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of St. John in Siewierz, front view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
22 Market Square in Siewierz, facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
6-8 3 Maja Street in Katowice, facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 24 December 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (24 December 2025)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kraków Szeroka 22 2022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 01:25, 22 December 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chorzów evangelical cemetery night 2019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 24 December 2025 (UTC)

Wesołych Świąt


Happy Holydays and Happy New Year 2025!
Tournasol7

--Tournasol7 (talk) 12:28, 24 December 2025 (UTC)

Happy Holidays!

--Tagooty (talk) 15:26, 24 December 2025 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
5 Bydgoska Street in Toruń, view from the south.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ossuary at Saint James church fence in Toruń, view from the east.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of St. Paul in Ruda Śląska, view from the west.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 25 December 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (25 December 2025)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bytom Witczaka 82 2022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 19:48, 22 December 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bytom mural pod wiaduktem 2022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 19:48, 22 December 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:44, 25 December 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (26 December 2025)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hel Baltycka 7 2022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JackyM59 22:50, 23 December 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chorzów Silesia Office Center 2022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --PantheraLeo1359531 20:17, 23 December 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Katowice St Mary church at night N 2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
17 Wolności Square in Puck, facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Hedwig church in Ziemięcice, view from the west.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Art Palace in Kraków, southeastern facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 27 December 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (27 December 2025)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Władysławowo widok z Domu Rybaka 2022 (30).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:51, 24 December 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Władysławowo widok z Domu Rybaka 2022 (27).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:51, 24 December 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Władysławowo widok z Domu Rybaka 2022 (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:51, 24 December 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Władysławowo widok z Domu Rybaka 2022 (31).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:51, 24 December 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Władysławowo widok z Domu Rybaka 2022 (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:51, 24 December 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bytom koksownia Carbo-Koks detal 2022 (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 10:16, 24 December 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:43, 27 December 2025 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
5 Bankowa Street in Katowice, façade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Holy Trinity church in Wodzisław Śląski, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
7 Bałtycka Street in Hel, view from the west.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 28 December 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (28 December 2025)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Piekary Slaskie Kozlowa Gora chapel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 21:02, 25 December 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Katowice Mickiewicza 26 door 2024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 21:50, 25 December 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Katowice CINiBA door 2023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Giles Laurent 23:02, 25 December 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bytom koksownia Carbo-Koks detal 2022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support A well-taken photo of a post-industrial monument. High quality. Gabriel3 16:03, 23 December 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 28 December 2025 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Methodist church in Wrocław, interior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
30 Warszawska Street in Katowice, façade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pentecostal church in Prudnik, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (29 December 2025)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hel Falochron Południowy 2022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Pangalau 15:24, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Władysławowo widok z Domu Rybaka 2022 (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 02:27, 27 December 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hel port chłodnia 2022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Pangalau 15:24, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Władysławowo widok z Domu Rybaka 2022 (28).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Pangalau 15:24, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Signalling mast in Hel.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Calf shed, slaughterhouse in Szczecin, view from the southwest.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Great Mill in Gdańsk, interior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:23, 30 December 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (30 December 2025)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ruda Śląska plebania św. Pawła elewacja 2025.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 18:34, 27 December 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ruda Śląska 120 lat Kopalni Bielszowice.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 03:38, 28 December 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ruda Śląska plebania św. Pawła 2025.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 20:43, 27 December 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 30 December 2025 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chapel in Kozłowa Góra, Piekary Śląskie, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
88 Wiejska Street in Hel, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
86 Wiejska Street in Hel, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 31 December 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (31 December 2025)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jastarnia Cmentarzowa Góra kamień 2022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 12:46, 28 December 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ruda Śląska Jana Pawla II 2a oficyna 2025.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:59, 28 December 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sosnowiec Wydział Nauk o Ziemi Uniwersytetu Śląskiego 2025.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:59, 28 December 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Siewierz ławeczka Pyzik 2025.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:59, 28 December 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Siewierz ławeczka Hadyna 2025.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 12:46, 28 December 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jastarnia plaża 2022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Milseburg 19:39, 28 December 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:51, 31 December 2025 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
33 Wojewódzka Street in Katowice, old part, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Former fishing port complex of Hel.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
80 Stanisława Witczaka Street in Bytom, façade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Building of the Jagiellonian Library, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dugout of Hel Lighthouse, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
24 Juliusza Słowackiego Street in Katowice, façade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:26, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (01 January 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Siewierz fontanna rzeźba 2025.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Rohit14400 11:29, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sosnowiec Żyleta 2025.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Rohit14400 11:29, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:50, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
38 Francuska Street in Katowice, view from the southwest.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior of Saint Bartholomew church in Chęciny, view towards the main altar.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (02 January 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bytom St Hyacinth church apse 2022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JackyM59 20:37, 30 December 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Katowice Pilsudski monument 2023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JackyM59 20:37, 30 December 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:44, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
15-17 2 Czerwca Square in Chęciny, front view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the Assumption of Mary in Gliwice, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Silesian Theatre – interior, auditorium.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Synagogue in Chęciny, view from the south in 2022 before restoration.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:23, 3 January 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (03 January 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Katowice Sad Okregowy facade 2023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Pdanese 11:39, 31 December 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 3 January 2026 (UTC)

File:Sasa Santel Koncil slovenske glasbe.jpg

File:Sasa Santel Koncil slovenske glasbe.jpg has been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and if appropriate contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

TadejM (t/p) 19:09, 4 January 2026 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
7 Henryka Dąbrowskiego Street in Chorzów, interior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
36 Władysława Łokietka Street in Chęciny, interior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Supersam in Katowice, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Anthony of Padua rectory in Chorzów – exterior, view from the west.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Hyacinth church in Bytom, façade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior of courthouse in Bytom, courtyard.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:23, 5 January 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (05 January 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ruda Śląska kościół św. Pawła lew prawy bok 2025.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 03:04, 3 January 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:49, 5 January 2026 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior of Holy Cross church in Bytom, view towards the main altar.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nativity of the Virgin Mary church interior in Miasteczko Śląskie, view towards the main altar.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior of Saint Barbara church in Gliwice, view towards the main altar.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 7 January 2026 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Leonard chapel in Chęciny, interior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tar container in Ruda Śląska before restoration.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
36 Władysława Łokietka Street in Chęciny, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:23, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (08 January 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sól Schronisko Oźna 2026.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 21:50, 5 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sól Kraśniany 2026.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Tobias ToMar Maier 21:52, 5 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sól Kraśniany kapliczka 2026.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 22:29, 5 January 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the Nativity of the Virgin Mary in Mysłowice, interior, view towards the main altar.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Margaret of Antioch church in Bytom, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior of Holy Spirit Church in Bytom, view towards the main altar.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (09 January 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sól 209 2026.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 11:00, 6 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sól dzwonnica 2026.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. Pretty belfry --JackyM59 11:10, 6 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sól 151 ściana 2026.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Giles Laurent 10:54, 6 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sól 139 drzwi 2026.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Giles Laurent 10:55, 6 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sól Schronisko Oźna 2026.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 21:50, 5 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sól Kraśniany 2026.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Tobias ToMar Maier 21:52, 5 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sól Kraśniany kapliczka 2026.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 22:29, 5 January 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St. Hedwig's Church in Zabrze, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Anthony chapel in Piekary Śląskie, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 10 January 2026 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Seed shelling plant storehouse in Zwierzyniec, interior, third floor.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Habsburg Palace in Rajcza, exterior, view from the south.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior of Dietrichstein Palace in Wodzisław Śląski, first floor.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lasocki Palace in Kraków, exterior, view from the south.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Seed shelling plant in Zwierzyniec, interior, first floor.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
16a combat bunker in Świętochłowice, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Workshop at Rudy Railway Museum, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
22 Dworcowa Street in Bytom, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Palace in Tworóg, southeastern façade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
16 Dworcowa Street in Bytom, façade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
25 Strzelców Bytomskich Street in Bytom, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Water tower at Oświęcimska Street in Bytom, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:23, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (13 January 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sól dom 139 2026.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --KaiBorgeest 23:38, 10 January 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:49, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Holy Cross church in Bytom-Miechowice, façade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
21 Market Square in Bytom, façade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
5 Mariacka Street in Bytom, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
12 Market Square in Bytom, façade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
20 Market Square in Bytom, façade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hall of the former power station Królewska Huta in Chorzów, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
19 Jainty Street in Bytom, façade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:26, 16 January 2026 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
40 3 Maja Street in Katowice, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
13 Dworcowa Street in Katowice, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
6 Korfantego Street in Katowice, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Courthouse on Korfantego Street in Katowice, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
2 Jana Matejki Street in Katowice, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
4 Moniuszki Street in Katowice, façade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:23, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Widok sponad Wagi NW.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Widok sponad Wagi NW.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (19 January 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bytom Spacerowa bunker semi-cupola inside 2022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 17:49, 16 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chorzów Siemianowicka 46 attic 2020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:48, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
26 Mickiewicza Street in Katowice, façade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 20 January 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (20 January 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tychy osiedle A fontanna 2025.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 21:46, 17 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tychy osiedle A hutnik 2025.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JackyM59 21:19, 17 January 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:46, 20 January 2026 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
13 Stawowa Street in Katowice, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
2 Sokolska Street in Katowice, façade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
45 Warszawska Street in Katowice, façade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 21 January 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (21 January 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Katowice Pomnik Powstańców Śląskich aerial 2025.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Benlisquare 06:07, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:53, 21 January 2026 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
11 Wolności Square in Katowice, façade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (22 January 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Siemianowice topola kanadyjska pl. Skrzeka i Wójcika kora (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 15:23, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Katowice Jagiellońska 24 2023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 15:36, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bytom warsztaty naprawcze GKW 2023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Pdanese 12:47, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tatry Bielskie z Wagi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JackyM59 19:19, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:47, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
12 Wolności Square in Katowice, façade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
10A Wolności Square in Katowice, façade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
57 Warszawska Street in Katowice, façade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:24, 24 January 2026 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
7 Pocztowa Street in Katowice, façade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 25 January 2026 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
6 Bogucicka street in Katowice, façade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kino Gloria cinema, façade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cemetery chapel in Piekary Śląskie (Kalwaryjska Street), exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
3 Piastowska Street in Katowice, façade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sacred Heart church in Mysłowice, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jurand shaft II winding engine house, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Our Lady of Częstochowa church in Dobiesław, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:24, 28 January 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (29 January 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Katowice Moniuszki 2 drzwi 2024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 10:01, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rudziczka kościół Trójcy Świętej 2025 wnętrze (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:39, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rudziczka kościół Trójcy Świętej 2025 wnętrze (20).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:39, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rudziczka kościół Trójcy Świętej 2025 organy (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:39, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rudziczka kościół Trójcy Świętej 2025 tabernakulum (18).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:39, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Katowice Bankowa 5 wejście 2024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Romzig 21:40, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 29 January 2026 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Katowice old train station office building, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
September Scouts Monument, Katowice, designed by Zygmunt Brachmański, front view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior of Holy Trinity church in Rudziczka, view towards the main altar.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of St. John in Siewierz, interior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wojciech bridge in Zabrze.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Lawrence and Saint Casimir church in Rajcza, exterior, aerial view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (04 February 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Katowice CINiBA detal 2026 (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 19:17, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pigwa owoc nasiona.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 19:17, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 4 February 2026 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Siemianowice III shaft winding tower in Siemianowice Śląskie, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Siemianowice Śląskie Town Hall, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rheinbaben Palace in Siemianowice Śląskie – exterior, southern façade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (05 February 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Katowice CINiBA detal 2026 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:04, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Housing estate at Górnicza Street in Siemianowice Śląskie, aerial view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Huta Jedność housing estate in Siemianowice Śląskie, aerial view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Huta Pokój gate II building, façade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St. John the Baptist church in Zabrze, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Euura miliaris (Army Willow Nematine), larva.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Northern outbuilding of Donnersmarck Palace in Siemianowice Śląskie, exterior after restoration.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gardener's house in Siemianowice Śląskie, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Water tower in Brynek, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 10 February 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (10 February 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chorzów Przystań 2025.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:18, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chorzów rzeźba Perkoz 2025.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 16:02, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pigwa owoc przekrój.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The close wall is a bit disturbing but the pear sharpness is ok to me. --Selbymay 19:51, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 10 February 2026 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
New church of St. Martin in Tarnowskie Góry, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
W Kielnikach Cave in Olsztyn, interior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Solna Jama cave in Gniewoszów, interior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 11 February 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (11 February 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ruda Slaska Staw Szkopka (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Benjism89 17:19, 8 February 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 11 February 2026 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Palace in Jarząbkowice, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pawłowice Palace, Wrocław, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Palace in Krotoszyn, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 13 February 2026 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Joseph church in Ruda Śląska, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Železná brána, view from the south.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Western facade of the Łańcut Castle in Łańcut.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (15 February 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Topinambur pieczony (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --A S M Jobaer 17:16, 12 February 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
W-1 building of University of Technology in Kraków, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
15 Wały Generała Sikorskiego in Toruń, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (18 February 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Siemianowice skwer Laura fontanna (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 12:40, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Siemianowice skwer Laura fontanna (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 14:39, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Siemianowice wieża szybu Siemianowice III 2025 (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 12:40, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Siemianowice skwer Laura fontanna (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 14:39, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:43, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (19 February 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Topinambur pieczony 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Pdanese 13:36, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 19 February 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (20 February 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Siemianowice skwer Laura św. Florian 2025 (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poconaco 18:43, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Siemianowice wieża szybu Siemianowice III 2025 (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poconaco 18:43, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Siemianowice wieża szybu Siemianowice III 2025 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poconaco 18:43, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Siemianowice skwer Laura fontanna (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poconaco 18:43, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Siemianowice wieża szybu Siemianowice III 2025.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poconaco 18:43, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 20 February 2026 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
26 Piastowska Street in Prudnik, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jewish cemetery in Głogówek.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Clock tower of IV Lyceum in Bytom.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 21 February 2026 (UTC)

Geocode added

Hi Gower, I hope you are doing well! I just wanted to let you know that I added the geocode as you requested. Perhaps you wanted this added before voting one way or another? Thank you for your time and have a nice week-end! -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:04, 21 February 2026 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Dorothy church in Będzin, interior, view towards the main altar.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 22 February 2026 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Orthodox church in Sosnowiec, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior of Sosnowiec Cathedral, view towards the organ loft.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dom Handlowy Zenit, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (25 February 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chorzow Urbanowicza 2 sala gimnastyczna 2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 03:11, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Katowice pl. Wolności 8 E 2025.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 03:11, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Katowice pl. Wolności 6 2025.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 22:45, 22 February 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Katowice pl. Wolności 7 2025.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 03:11, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Liptovské Revúce kościół burza 2025.jpg

العربية  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  Bahasa Melayu  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ತುಳು  Türkçe  українська  中文  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  中文(臺灣)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Liptovské Revúce kościół burza 2025.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{self|cc-zero}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 20:06, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

File:Jolanta Wadowska-Król Katowice 2021.jpg

File:Jolanta Wadowska-Król Katowice 2021.jpg has been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and if appropriate contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Lutheraner (talk) 00:26, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (27 February 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chorzów Urbanowicza 2 2021 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:48, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St. Hedwig's Church, Chorzów, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church in Liptovské Revúce – exterior, view from the south.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church in Liptovské Revúce – interior, view towards the main altar.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 3 March 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (04 March 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Buczkowice kościół Przemienienia Pańskiego aerial 2026.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Romzig 19:56, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (05 March 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chorzów Katowicka 60 58 2026.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:15, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Buczkowice Grunwaldzka 309 2026.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:15, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Čierny kameň (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:15, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Liptovské Revúce kościół 2025.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:15, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

5 днів до завершення Місячника ілюстрування української природи у 2026 році — встигніть долучитися!

Вікі любить Землю 2026
Перейдіть до сторінки кампанії

5 днів до завершення Місячника ілюстрування української природи у 2026 році — встигніть долучитися до 10 березня включно!⏳🌿

Місячник ілюстрування української природи — це проєкт, присвячений ілюструванню української Вікіпедії та Вікіданих світлинами з фотоконкурсу «Вікі любить Землю» і триває він з 10 лютого до 10 березня 2026 року.

Семеро активних учасників та учасниць вже протягом майже місяця опрацьовують десятки і сотні статей Вікіпедії та елементів Вікіданих.

Зробіть свій внесок і ви!

Щоб стати учасником чи учасницею кампанії, нагадуємо:

1️⃣проілюструйте принаймні одну статтю української Вікіпедії чи один елемент Вікіданих фотографією з фотоконкурсу «Вікі любить Землю»;

2️⃣додайте себе у розділ «Учасники та внесок» на сторінці проєкту;

3️⃣регулярно додавайте свій внесок у той розділ згідно із системою балів.

5 найактивніших учасників та учасниць конкурсу отримають цінні призи від організаторів — сертифікати інтернет-магазинів. Усі учасники й учасниці також зможуть отримати офіційний сертифікат участі від «Вікімедіа Україна» та сувеніри.

🔎Детальніше про Місячник ілюстрування української природи шукайте на сторінці кампанії.

Якщо маєте запитання чи ідеї, пишіть нам за адресою wle@wikimedia.org.ua

Стежте за новинами проєкту у Facebook, Instagram або в блозі. Також ключова інформація буде з'являтися на сторінці у Вікісховищі.

Сподіваємося на вашу участь!

Ви отримали це повідомлення, адже брали участь у «Вікі любить Землю» раніше. Якщо Ви не хочете отримувати сповіщення, пов'язані з «Вікі любить Землю» — додайте свою сторінку користувача до цієї категорії або напишіть організаційній команді конкурсу. -- Оргкомітет «Вікі любить Землю».14:14, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Roadside chapel "u Koconia" in Ujsoły, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (06 March 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Katowice Silesia Star dach aerial 2025.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Phyrexian 20:00, 3 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Katowice KWK Katowice aerial 2025 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Cutlass 21:08, 3 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Buczkowice Grunwaldzka 309 2026 (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Cutlass 21:09, 3 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Katowice KWK Katowice aerial 2025 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Cutlass 21:09, 3 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Katowice Rondo Ziętka aerial 2026.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:15, 2 March 2026 (UTC)
 Support You should nominate it for FP status. --Екатерина Борисова 02:44, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

Вікі любить фольклор 2026: завантажуйте фото, відео та аудіо нематеріальної культурної спадщини України!

Цікавитеся традиціями та маєте фото чи відео народних святкувань, танців, записи співів чи майстрів традиційних мистецтв за роботою? Тоді запрошуємо до конкурсу «Вікі любить фольклор»!

З 1 лютого по 31 березня 2026 року завантажуйте світлини, відео та аудіо нематеріальної культурної спадщини у Вікісховище та долучайтеся до її популяризації.

«Вікі любить фольклор» — це міжнародний конкурс, метою якого є документування народних традицій, вбрання, танців, співів, святкувань та обрядів, щоб наповнити Вікіпедію якісними зображеннями для ілюстрування статей. Щоб взяти участь, перейдіть на сторінку «Вікі любить фольклор».

П'ять найкращих світлин отримають цінні призи та сувеніри на українському етапі конкурсу.

Три учасники чи учасниці, які своїми фото проілюструють найбільше статей Вікіпедії та інших вікіпроєктів, також отримають призи в українській частині конкурсу. Всі фото, відео та аудіо будуть брати участь у міжнародному змаганні.

Важливо! Для участі в конкурсі необхідно вказати детальний опис фольклорної цінності матеріалів (назва події чи обряду, хто виконує/бере участь, місце, дата тощо).

Також з 1 лютого по 31 березня проходить конкурс статей «Фемінізм та фольклор 2026» — щорічна міжнародна ініціатива у межах кампанії «Вікі любить фольклор», що спрямована на висвітлення культурного розмаїття та гендерної інклюзивності у Вікіпедії.

Долучайтеся до конкурсу та допоможіть зберегти українську культурну спадщину для майбутніх поколінь!

Українська частина конкурсу відбувається за підтримки ГО «Вікімедіа Україна».

Ви отримали це повідомлення, бо брали участь у фотоконкурсах раніше. Якщо не хочете більше отримувати сповіщення про цей конкурс, напишіть мені

--Олена Вінсент [ВМУА] (від імені організаційної команди конкурсу) 14:29, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (07 March 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chorzów Urbanowicza 2 narożnik 2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Umarxon III 13:58, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:43, 7 March 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (10 March 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Katowice bazylika św. Stefana aerial 2026.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --BlueRockThrush 21:51, 7 March 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Mary of Help church in Katowice – exterior, view from the northwest.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 11 March 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (11 March 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Piekary Śląskie kościół śś. Piotra i Pawła 2026.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 18:23, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Piekary Śląskie kościół śś. Piotra i Pawła 2026 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --BlueRockThrush 19:26, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Katowice KWK Katowice aerial 2025 (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Igor123121 19:50, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Buczkowice Grunwaldzka 780 2026.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Igor123121 19:50, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 11 March 2026 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
87 Markiefki Street in Katowice, façade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (13 March 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Katowice pałac biskupi aerial 2026.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:27, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Katowice I LO Kopernika aerial 2026.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:27, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Katowice I LO Kopernika aerial 2026 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:27, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Čierny kameň (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 23:52, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Katowice Markiefki 87 aerial 2026.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Bottom crop is not very good. Also vignetting a bit. --Екатерина Борисова 02:43, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Thanks for the review, I don't notice significant vignetting, only sky gradient. The bottom crop is the result of the fact that there are tin shacks with shops at the bottom, which I wanted to avoid --Gower 18:23, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
 Info There has been no vote here. Please do not set anything to "/Discuss" without a vote with which you disagree. Please discuss here. Image was reset to "/Nomination". --Robert Flogaus-Faust 19:42, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
IMO you can crop or retouch these shacks roofs. And it would be nice to darken that white car in the center a little. It attracts attention, but it's completely blown out. --Екатерина Борисова 00:07, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Екатерина Борисова thanks, new version uploaded with retouched roofs and darkened car. How it looks now? --Gower 21:32, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
 Support Looks better now, thanks There're still some parts of objects in the bottom like utility poles and signs, but they're look natural and not disturbing IMO. --Екатерина Борисова 03:26, 11 March 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of SS. Peter and Paul in Piekary Śląskie – exterior, view from the south.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (14 March 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Buczkowice Grunwaldzka aerial 2026.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Umarxon III 06:23, 11 March 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:43, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (17 March 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Katowice Żwirki i Wigury 2024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Igor123121 21:25, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Katowice kościół św. Józefa aerial 2026.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Igor123121 21:25, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (20 March 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bytom Musialika ruiny szkoły 2023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:05, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Katowice pl. Wolności 11 szczyt 2024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:05, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ziemięcice kościół św. Jadwigi wejście 2024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:05, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bytom pomnik Moniuszki 2022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:05, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bydgoszcz Mózg 2019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:05, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 20 March 2026 (UTC)

Kadrowanie zdjęć

Hej,

Jak kadrujesz zdjęcie, do którego wcześniej była dosłana zgoda na VTR to nie ma potrzeby uzyskiwać ekstra zgodę na przekadrowanie. Wtedy w opisie zdjęcie podajesz informację, że to przekadrowane zdjęcie X, w polu autor podajesz autora pracy oryginalnej oraz siebie jako autora przekadrowania i sprawa załatwiona. Polimerek (talk) 09:37, 4 April 2026 (UTC)

@Polimerek wiem, że nie ma potrzeby uzyskiwać ekstra zgody na przekadrowanie, ale ja to wykadrowałem, zanim wstawiłeś zgodę do pierwotnego zdjęcia, a ja nie mam uprawnień, żeby to wstawić do pliku. Gower (talk) 09:50, 4 April 2026 (UTC)

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2025 voting is open!

2024 Picture of the Year:Mundari man polishing the horns of one of his Watusi cows using a mixture of cow urine and ash as a ritualistic and protective practice in a temporary cattle camp in Terekeka, South Sudan.

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2025 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year is the twentieth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favourite images featured on Commons during the last year (2025) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the top 5% of most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just five images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2024 Picture of the Year contest.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:22, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

Monika Borzym, zdjęcie do zmiany ☹️

Autorka w programie radiowym Artura Andrusa emitowanym w RMF Classic zgłosiła prośbę o zmianę zajęcia. ~2026-22524-03 (talk) 08:13, 12 April 2026 (UTC)

@~2026-22524-03 no to niech załaduje lepsze to zmienimy Gower (talk) 08:35, 12 April 2026 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2025 voting is open!

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you previously voted in the Picture of the Year contest. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favourite images featured on Commons during the last year (2025) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of five images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2025.

Round 2 will end at UTC.

Click here to vote now!

If you have already voted for Round 2, please ignore this message.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:08, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (21 April 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Katowice bebok Konopiusz 2024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poconaco 21:42, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 21 April 2026 (UTC)

The Photographer's Barnstar
Thank you for all these useful and high-quality images. Thank you for the help provided to beginners on QI and VI. JackyM59 (talk) 10:21, 26 April 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (03 May 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jaworznik ujście do Brynicy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Crisco 1492 00:04, 1 May 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 3 May 2026 (UTC)