You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki.
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Nacaru 00:26, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality --Syrio 10:08, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Nacaru 00:23, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --IM3847 16:04, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. English description would be helpful. --Ermell 13:31, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support A bit grainy, but given the high resolution it is ok. --Plozessor 04:41, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Lrkrol 10:21, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Lrkrol 10:21, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:14, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support High quality --ArildV 13:12, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:09, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:09, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:10, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --ArildV 11:19, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Thanks for good photos. Since you are a skilled photographe, please try to review some photos also. ArildV --ArildV 08:34, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:24, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:29, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:27, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support A bit noisy, but still good enough for QI. --C messier 19:58, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Could be sharper, but given the high resolution it's ok. --Plozessor 04:40, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments There are slight traces of CA, otherwise good --Poco a poco 15:57, 22 May 2024 (UTC) THANKS Normally I just correct them, it's true that they are light (sorry my english) --Skander zarrad 16:37, 22 May 2024 (UTC) Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:49, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments You will need to id it for QI --Poco a poco 15:57, 22 May 2024 (UTC) I just added the identification, I hadn't paid attention, thank you:) --Skander zarrad 16:19, 22 May 2024 (UTC) Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:49, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --MB-one 09:29, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
CommentsGood qualiry, nice catch! --Красный 06:57, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Pouillot fitis.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:17, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:17, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support High quality. --ArildV 08:39, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Moroder 16:52, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:50, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Would be ok but nomination is not signed (as are the others) --Plozessor 04:14, 26 May 2024 (UTC) ohh, i dont know why, i will see it to fix it, thank you --Skander zarrad 06:48, 26 May 2024 (UTC) i fixe it, and the other, thanks to telling me --Skander zarrad 22:32, 26 May 2024 (UTC) Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:15, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
CommentsBeautiful image, good quality -- Spurzem 10:12, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:55, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:52, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The dust spots should be removed. --Ermell 05:49, 22 May 2024 (UTC) oh I hadn't seen the dust, thank you, I'll take care of it as soon as I get home --Skander zarrad 07:18, 24 May 2024 (UTC) I removed the dust from the photo, thank you --Skander zarrad 20:09, 27 May 2024 (UTC) Support Good quality. --Ermell 14:46, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Apparently upscaled, leading to some artifacts. --C messier 19:58, 22 May 2024 (UTC) I corrected the problems caused by the upscale, I no longer use this method from now on, thank you very much --Skander zarrad 20:45, 27 May 2024 (UTC) Support Good quality. --C messier 20:36, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Apparently upscaled, leading to artifacts. Also, some color fringing. --C messier 19:58, 22 May 2024 (UTC) I will look to correct it and put the non-uplscale version THANKS --Skander zarrad 07:18, 25 May 2024 (UTC) I corrected the problems caused by the upscale, I no longer use this method from now on, thank you very much --Skander zarrad 20:45, 27 May 2024 (UTC) Support Borderline sharpness but IMHO OK given the subject. --C messier 20:36, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I think it is tilted clockwise. --C messier 19:58, 22 May 2024 (UTC) very light yes --Skander zarrad 07:17, 25 May 2024 (UTC) I fixed the tilt, thanks --Skander zarrad 20:44, 27 May 2024 (UTC) Support Good quality. --C messier 20:36, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --ArildV 08:16, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:25, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --MB-one 15:19, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --MB-one 17:23, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
CommentsI'd suggest to crop-out the empty space, at least some of it. Красный 15:14, 2 June 2024 (UTC) I just cropped the photo, we can actually see the bird better --Skander zarrad 19:34, 3 June 2024 (UTC) Support Good quality. Красный 16:12, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --MB-one 12:39, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --MB-one 12:04, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
CommentsOverexposed IMO. Fixable? Красный 15:30, 5 June 2024 (UTC) fixable yes, i will --Skander zarrad 16:18, 5 June 2024 (UTC) I reworked the exposure, the impression of overexposure should no longer be there. Thanks for the reviews:) --Skander zarrad 18:57, 5 June 2024 (UTC) Support Good quality. --Красный 12:34, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
CommentsOverexposed and depth of field is a bit too small. Maybe fixable. Красный 15:30, 5 June 2024 (UTC) I reworked the exposure, the impression of overexposure should no longer be there. THANKS:) --Skander zarrad 18:49, 5 June 2024 (UTC) Support Good quality. --Красный 21:29, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:08, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Guepe - tunisie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Lvova 12:39, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Lvova 10:55, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. Wished the dromedar would be larger in the picture --MB-one 14:07, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:25, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:55, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Lvova 12:49, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --MB-one 08:41, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --MB-one 22:41, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
Hi there - you know your country of course, so apologies for this question. Are your current QI nominations taken in a protected area of Tunisia? The descriptions on the WLE Tunisia page are not very clear at all. I had a look at some of your other images and I think it would be helpful to add geolocation to all of them. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:35, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
sorry to trouble you again - I just found this page. Who maintains this? Is it an automated process? Thanks. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:57, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
and I hope your fishing net picture wins something. It is really clever. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:01, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
normally I put the geolocation for each of the photos that I upload now. Maybe I didn't do it for the very first ones. Skander zarrad (talk) 21:28, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Lvova 16:29, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:45, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:18, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Lvova 09:01, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
CommentsSupport Not the best focus, but good compo and lights. --Sebring12Hrs 17:08, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:33, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --MB-one 21:52, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Lvova 00:04, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Lvova 00:04, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:00, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Swallow family, but house martin. Please use current taxonomy. Over-categorized: Tunisia/Bird. --Charlesjsharp 21:33, 19 June 2024 (UTC) I will check it and correct it, thank you --Skander zarrad 07:29, 20 June 2024 (UTC) its done --Skander zarrad 08:44, 20 June 2024 (UTC) Support Good quality. Thanks --Charlesjsharp 09:08, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Lvova 11:12, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Lvova 11:12, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:19, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:18, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
CommentsComment The right one is bad cropped. --Sebring12Hrs 12:59, 20 June 2024 (UTC) I adjusted the crop and some details, thank you very much for all the comments --Skander zarrad 07:36, 21 June 2024 (UTC) Support No problem. The compo is very good now;) --Sebring12Hrs 10:43, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
CommentsOverexposed , maybe fixable, but highlights seems blown-out. Красный 14:02, 17 June 2024 (UTC) i fix it tomorrow --Skander zarrad 21:30, 19 June 2024 (UTC) its done --Skander zarrad 08:45, 20 June 2024 (UTC) Support Good quality. --Красный 05:18, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:31, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --MB-one 14:36, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Tagooty 00:50, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Pdanese 00:56, 26 June 2024 (UTC) Support Not FP, but a much better image than the current FPC. --Charlesjsharp 10:20, 26 June 2024 (UTC) thank you , yes, I should have suggested this one --Skander zarrad 15:53, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Lvova 06:27, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Bgag 03:07, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Bgag 03:07, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:06, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:15, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:15, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:29, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --ArildV 07:22, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --MB-one 07:55, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
Wiki Loves Earth International 2024 | Your winning place on the International round
Hello!
My name is Olesia, I’m a project manager for the Wiki Loves Earth International photocontest devoted to natural heritage worldwide.
I’m happy to contact you with the information that your photo has got into the main top 20 best images of Wiki Loves Earth 2024 and into the special nomination "Human Rights and Environment". Congratulations!
Check the full post here: https://wikilovesearth.org/
🏆We would like to reward you with the prizes and invite for the Award ceremony.
Please, for more details contact me at olesia.lukaniuk@wikimedia.org.ua or text via wiki-email by this link, by 17th December! OlesiaLukaniuk (WMUA) (talk) 15:09, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
Wrong ID in photo
Hi, I think in this photo you miss ID the species, should be Crocothemis erythraea. YedidyaPopper (talk) 07:13, 28 May 2025 (UTC)
Just to let you know, I've changed the file name and caption. If you think I was wrong to do so, please respond. YedidyaPopper (talk) 05:28, 25 June 2025 (UTC)
The international organizing team is preparing a session on Wiki Loves Earth International at the upcoming CEE Conference this September. In this session, we will uncover the hidden stories behind the submitted photos — and we would love to feature yours!
Behind every Wiki Loves Earth photo, there’s more than just nature — there’s you: the adventure, the challenge, the deep sense, the surprise, or even the funny coincidence that made the shot unforgettable.
📸 Did you hike 10 km at sunrise to get that perfect view?
📸 Did an unexpected animal step into your frame?
📸 Was the landscape hiding a secret only locals know?
📸 Was it taken in a fragile ecosystem or a territory under threat from climate change or human activity?
📸 Or does it show a place already damaged, reminding us why preservation matters?
📸 Or maybe the photo/video changed the way you see nature?
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Mosbatho 15:44, 24 September 2025 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Benjism89 20:33, 25 September 2025 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:57, 26 September 2025 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Benjism89 20:33, 25 September 2025 (UTC)
Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2024 voting is open!
Dear Wikimedian,
You are receiving this message because we noticed that you previously voted in the Picture of the Year contest. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2024) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2024.
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support The tree is not in focus, but the buldings have a good definition. Overall good quality. --Harlock81 19:11, 28 September 2025 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --MB-one 16:02, 29 September 2025 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Romzig 10:16, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 10:13, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 10:13, 5 October 2025 (UTC) Support Good quality. --Julian Lupyan 01:54, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 10:13, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ksar Aoun Vue 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Lvova 18:53, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I think the perspective needs to be corrected: the doors on the right are tilted to the left and those on the left are tilted to the right. --Lmbuga 21:25, 5 October 2025 (UTC) Support I agree it's tilted and must be fixed. But as soon as it is done, it will be remarkable. --Harmonide 00:46, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
CommentsOppose Too noisy. --Sebring12Hrs 08:06, 4 November 2025 (UTC) i correct it , thank you --Skander zarrad 07:45, 5 November 2025 (UTC) Comment Also moving this one to CR. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 08:26, 5 November 2025 (UTC) Support But now it is good. --Sebring12Hrs 20:34, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 20:12, 6 November 2025 (UTC) Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:12, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Gower 17:19, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
CommentsComment Dust spot at the upper right. I will add a note this evening. Sebring12Hrs, 4 November 2025 i correct it , thank you --Skander zarrad 07:45, 5 November 2025 (UTC) Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 10:04, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --IM027 21:16, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
CommentsGood quality, mais je retirerais la canette située devant droite de l'objet principal. --Michielverbeek 11:01, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very detailed image. But I suggest a small perspective correction. --Augustgeyler 08:39, 11 November 2025 (UTC) I've corrected that, thank you for the feedback. --Skander zarrad 10:30, 11 November 2025 (UTC) Support Good quality. Thank you. --Augustgeyler 10:36, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. Beautiful favorable light. --Gower 20:58, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Nymphée vue 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. Very detailed and clean composition. --Augustgeyler 08:45, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Nymphée vue 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Gower 20:58, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 06:13, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 06:13, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Noised sky at top, otherwise good --George Chernilevsky 20:24, 9 November 2025 (UTC) Beautiful image, but the sky is a little bit noisy at the upper right. Other opinion? --Sebring12Hrs 20:37, 9 November 2025 (UTC) I just fixed the noise in the sky --Skander zarrad 15:38, 11 November 2025 (UTC) Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 19:37, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. In my opinion this composition has too much sky, but still QI. --Augustgeyler 08:40, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality, not very sharp but acceptable --Gower 10:38, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice image. But there is Color banding in the sky. Can you improve this? --Augustgeyler 08:39, 11 November 2025 (UTC) I've corrected that, thank you for the feedback. --Skander zarrad 10:30, 11 November 2025 (UTC) Comment Sorry but the colourbanding at the sky is still there. --Augustgeyler 10:36, 11 November 2025 (UTC) Support I can't see any issue with the sky (zero noise), the picture is sharp, the perspective ok, a bit overexposed, but it's QI to me. --Sebring12Hrs 19:12, 13 November 2025 (UTC) I yessss, I can see a posterization, but this is very minimal. --Sebring12Hrs 19:13, 13 November 2025 (UTC) Support QI to me. --Sebring12Hrs 19:14, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Giles Laurent 06:09, 14 November 2025 (UTC) Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 06:58, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Gower 08:14, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. In my opinion this composition has too much sky, but still QI. --Augustgeyler 08:40, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality, not very sharp but acceptable --Gower 10:38, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice image. But there is Color banding in the sky. Can you improve this? --Augustgeyler 08:39, 11 November 2025 (UTC) I've corrected that, thank you for the feedback. --Skander zarrad 10:30, 11 November 2025 (UTC) Comment Sorry but the colourbanding at the sky is still there. --Augustgeyler 10:36, 11 November 2025 (UTC) Support I can't see any issue with the sky (zero noise), the picture is sharp, the perspective ok, a bit overexposed, but it's QI to me. --Sebring12Hrs 19:12, 13 November 2025 (UTC) I yessss, I can see a posterization, but this is very minimal. --Sebring12Hrs 19:13, 13 November 2025 (UTC) Support QI to me. --Sebring12Hrs 19:14, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Too much vignetting. --Sebring12Hrs 15:21, 10 November 2025 (UTC) And PC is needed. All the buildings are leaning. --Sebring12Hrs 15:22, 10 November 2025 (UTC) I've just made the corrections, thank you. --Skander zarrad 15:30, 11 November 2025 (UTC) Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 09:03, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2025 voting is open!
2024 Picture of the Year:Mundari man polishing the horns of one of his Watusi cows using a mixture of cow urine and ash as a ritualistic and protective practice in a temporary cattle camp in Terekeka, South Sudan.
Dear Wikimedian,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2025 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year is the twentieth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favourite images featured on Commons during the last year (2025) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the top 5% of most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just five images to become the Picture of the Year.
Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2025 voting is open!
Dear Wikimedian,
You are receiving this message because we noticed that you previously voted in the Picture of the Year contest. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favourite images featured on Commons during the last year (2025) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of five images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2025.
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Romzig 21:45, 4 May 2026 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 21:50, 4 May 2026 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 21:50, 4 May 2026 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 21:54, 4 May 2026 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 07:12, 3 May 2026 (UTC) Support Good quality. --Esniom 07:53, 4 May 2026 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Romzig 20:55, 5 May 2026 (UTC)
Announcing the Winners of Picture of the Year 2025!
Hi everyone,
Wikimedia Commons is pleased to finally announce the winners of this year's Picture of the Year 2025 contest! We had some truly incredible finalists to choose from, but the community has spoken.
Here are your top three winning images:
First place: The aftermath of an Israeli airstrike in Gaza City on October 9, 2023, leaving widespread destruction in the Rimal area. Attribution: WAFA (Q2915969) / CC-BY-SA 3.0
Second place: Baby cape fur seal (Arctocephalus pusillus) sleeping at Cape cross, Namibia. Attribution: Giles Laurent / CC-BY-SA 4.0
Third place: A gigantic jet photographed from the International Space Station by astronaut Nichole Ayers. Attribution: public domain
You can view the full results and see where all your favorite images placed here: Full 2025 Results
I also want to highlight what an incredible turnout we had. In the second round, we saw a massive jump in both the number of users voting and the total votes cast. We had exactly 13,979 votes cast by 3,509 users! To put that in perspective, last year we had 7,403 votes from 2,837 users. It is amazing to see that level of growth and community engagement.
Thank you to everyone who voted, helped organize, and generally made the contest such a huge success this year!
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Romzig 20:41, 7 May 2026 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Romzig 20:33, 7 May 2026 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Esniom 09:29, 9 May 2026 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Esniom 09:28, 9 May 2026 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Romzig 16:06, 11 May 2026 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Romzig 16:06, 11 May 2026 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Pdanese 23:28, 14 May 2026 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Romzig 20:55, 19 May 2026 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Lvova 17:03, 20 May 2026 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:01, 21 May 2026 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Pdanese 23:53, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Romzig 20:26, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! OUED MAAROUF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Lvova 15:58, 1 June 2026 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Lvova 15:57, 1 June 2026 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Lvova 15:50, 1 June 2026 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Romzig 09:11, 7 June 2026 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Lvova 13:14, 8 June 2026 (UTC)
We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --MB-one 13:47, 8 June 2026 (UTC)