User talk:Eduard47

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Eduard47!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | asturianu | azərbaycanca | Bahasa Banjar | català | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | Esperanto | euskara | estremeñu | français | Frysk | galego | hrvatski | Bahasa Indonesia | interlingua | Interlingue | íslenska | italiano | Kiswahili | Kurdî | Latina | lietuvių | magyar | Bahasa Melayu | Mirandés | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | occitan | Plattdüütsch | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | rumantsch | Scots | shqip | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | Basa Sunda | suomi | svenska | Tagalog | Türkçe | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | Ирон | македонски | нохчийн | русский | српски / srpski | тоҷикӣ | українська | ქართული | Հայերեն | नेपाली | भोजपुरी | मराठी | हिन्दी | অসমীয়া | বাংলা | தமிழ் | മലയാളം | සිංහල | ไทย | ລາວ | ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး  | မြန်မာဘာသာ | 한국어 | 日本語 | 中文 | 中文(台灣)‎ | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 粵語 | עברית | اردو | العربية | تۆرکجه | سنڌي | فارسی | +/−

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 11:48, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

File:Hummelsbüttel NSG-LSG.jpg

Pay attention to copyright
File:Hummelsbüttel NSG-LSG.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  shqip  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

--Krdbot 00:01, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

File:Hummelsbüttel-Stadtteilgrenze und Schutzgebiete.jpg

Pay attention to copyright
File:Hummelsbüttel-Stadtteilgrenze und Schutzgebiete.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  shqip  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

--Krdbot 23:02, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

File:2017-09-02 HS-Reise Kotka Denkmal zur Erinnerung an Maria Purpur (1358).jpg

File:2017-09-02 HS-Reise Kotka Denkmal zur Erinnerung an Maria Purpur (1358).jpg has been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and if appropriate contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Estormiz (talk) 14:04, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

File:2017-089-02 HS-Reise Ehrenmal auf Friedhof an Stadtkirche Kotka (1391).jpg

File:2017-089-02 HS-Reise Ehrenmal auf Friedhof an Stadtkirche Kotka (1391).jpg has been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and if appropriate contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Estormiz (talk) 18:50, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

File:2017-09-02 HS-Reise Kotka Ehrenmal "Zu Ehren der Arbeit im Hafen" (1323).jpg

File:2017-09-02 HS-Reise Kotka Ehrenmal "Zu Ehren der Arbeit im Hafen" (1323).jpg has been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and if appropriate contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Estormiz (talk) 18:50, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

File:2017-09-02 HS-Reise Kotka Ehrenmal "Zu Ehren der Arbeit im Hafen" (1318).jpg

File:2017-09-02 HS-Reise Kotka Ehrenmal "Zu Ehren der Arbeit im Hafen" (1318).jpg has been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and if appropriate contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Estormiz (talk) 18:51, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

File:2017-09-02 HS-Reise Kotka Statue "Kotkat" (Eagles) im Sibelius Park (1293).jpg

File:2017-09-02 HS-Reise Kotka Statue "Kotkat" (Eagles) im Sibelius Park (1293).jpg has been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and if appropriate contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Estormiz (talk) 18:52, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

File:2017-09-02 HS-Reise Kotka Statue "Kotkat" (Eagles) im Sibelius Park (1292).jpg

File:2017-09-02 HS-Reise Kotka Statue "Kotkat" (Eagles) im Sibelius Park (1292).jpg has been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and if appropriate contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Estormiz (talk) 18:56, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

File:2017-03-21 Findling in Kokkola.jpg

File:2017-03-21 Findling in Kokkola.jpg has been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and if appropriate contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Estormiz (talk) 18:58, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

File:2017-03-22 Eiskarte-Ausschnitt des Bottnischen Meerbusen.jpg

File:2017-03-22 Eiskarte-Ausschnitt des Bottnischen Meerbusen.jpg has been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and if appropriate contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:55, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

Danke

Hallo Eduard47, danke für das Hinzufügen der Bildbeschreibungen bei den Bildern der Weserfähre! --Soluvo (talk) 17:47, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

2015-07-03 Brücke über den Großen Belt RB1631.jpg:

Dear Eduard; you turned my alterations on this picture back. There is only one bridge over the Grote Belt and it's officially called Oresund bridge (as far as I know). You put it back in a category, that is made for an old bridge in centre of Amsterdam, that is called the Beltbrug named after a dump (nothing to do with Grosze Belt). So that's incorrect anyway. Please put it back in Oresund bridge.Ceescamel (talk) 15:34, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

Sorry, now I changed it to "Storebælt Bridge", that's right, not "Oresund Bridge". Thanks for iinformation.--Eduard47 (talk) 15:47, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
I'm sorry too, but if two mistakes make it correct in the end, it's great:-)~~

File:Blue Port Hamburg 2014.jpg

File:Blue Port Hamburg 2014.jpg has been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and if appropriate contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 09:44, 14 September 2019 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:2019-08-20 Immenhof Luftaufnahme.jpg

العربية  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  Indonesia  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  Bahasa Melayu  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ತುಳು  Türkçe  українська  中文  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  中文(臺灣)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:2019-08-20 Immenhof Luftaufnahme.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{self|cc-zero}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 15:09, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated contents should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and if appropriate contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 04:00, 16 February 2025 (UTC)

File:2025-08-02 Kronsnest bei Elmshorn Fähre (36).jpg

Hallo Eduard47, erinnerst du dich noch, ob diese Infotafel frei zugänglich war bzw. ob du beim Fotografieren im öffentlichen Raum standest?
2. Frage: Ist dieses Schild File:2024-07-15 Dassow (81) Rosenhagen Gutshof.jpg da halbwegs dauerhaft aufgestellt oder war das nur im Rahmen von Bauarbeiten? --Túrelio (talk) 09:59, 17 October 2025 (UTC)

Hallo Túrelio, Du kannst vielleicht Fragen stellen.
Zu Frage 1: Wenn ich mich recht erinnere, befindet sich die Infotafel direkt an der Tür des "Ticketverkaufs" in dem grünen Bauwagen (siehe älteres Bild File:Kronsnest (Krückau).JPG bzw. File:2025-08-02 Kronsnest bei Elmshorn Fähre (10).jpg), dieser wiederum steht unmittelbar neben dem öffentlich zugänglichen Weg zur Fähre (Standort Ticketverkauf: lat=53.72120 | long=9.57779).
Zu Frage 2: Dieses Werbeschild ist m. E. nur temporär aufgestellt worden im Zuge des Baus und Vertriebs der Wohnungen. Die Häuser waren weitesgehend fertiggestellt, Zufahrt und Umfeld aber noch im Bau (siehe auch File:2024-07-15 Dassow (75) Rosenhagen Gutshof.jpg). Ob es heute, also 15 Monate später, immer noch dort steht ist mir nicht bekannt.
Ich hoffe, ich konnte Dir helfen, wenn weitere Fragen bestehen: Nur zu! Viele Grüße aus Hamburg, --Eduard47 (talk) 14:04, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
Danke schön. Ich habe diese Fragen, wie du eventuell schon vermuten könntest (wenn ein Admin so was fragt), zwecks urheberrechtl. Einschätzung gestellt.
Das 1. Foto habe ich jetzt mit dem Baustein "Panoramafreiheit" versehen, was meint, dass es nach der im dt. UrhG vorgesehenen Schranke/Ausnahme der Panoramafreiheit unterliegt, also o.k. ist.
Beim 2. Foto ist das eher nicht der Fall, weil das UrhG für Panoramafreiheit eine dauerhafte Aufstellung/Anbringung verlangt. Andererseits fände ich es schade, es löschen zu müssen, weil es irgendwie eine schöne Komposition darstellt, der blaue Himmel im Hintergrund und auf dem Bild auf der Tafel. Deshalb die Frage, wäre es denkbar, dass du die auf dem Plakat genannte Firma mal anschreibst und um deren Zustimmung bittest, dass dein Foto von deren Plakat/Werbeschild unter der gewählten freien Lizenz verbreitet werden darf? (Eigentlich sollten sie nichts dagegen haben, zumal man es ja fast als "Werbung" betrachten könnte.) --Túrelio (talk) 14:19, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
Danke für Deine Initiative. Für die Fähre Kronsnest gibt es hier noch einen interessanten Link. Der betreibende Verein ist für jede Hilfe und Werbung dankbar. Wegen des 2. Fotos habe ich die Immobilienfirma angeschrieben, mal seh'n, was die antworten. Gruß, Eduard47 (talk) 15:20, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
Prima. Wenn sie dazu bereit sind, sollen sie die Antwort direkt an permissions-commons-de@wikimedia.org (OTRS) senden. (Die OTRS-Kollegen mögen keine weitergeleiteten Genehmigungen.) Danke. --Túrelio (talk) 15:23, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
Hallo Túrelio, wir haben Glück. Der Urheber wird sein okay direkt an OTRS senden, ist aber zzt in Urlaub. Es dauert wohl noch ein paar Tage. Da das Bild bisher nirgendwo verwendet wurde, dürfte das wohl zu vertreten sein. Gruß aus Hamburg, --Eduard47 (talk) 17:41, 21 October 2025 (UTC)

Image licensing query

Hello, concerning File:BREMEN IV (02) erste Fahrt 1929.jpg and File:BREMEN IV (03) erste Fahrt 1929.jpg, which were uploaded by you last year under an "own work" CCSA4.0 license, can you explain how that is, for images originally taken 96 years ago? If the original source cannot be provided and determined to be genuinelly freely licensed, perhaps even already being PD, then it should not exist on commons. Thanks. Bungle (talkcontribs) 12:55, 30 November 2025 (UTC)

Hallo, die Fotos hat mein Vater (geboren 1912, gestorben 1998) gemacht. Ich als sein Erbe habe diese -und weitere- übernommen und bei Commons hochgeladen. Ich verfüge also über alle Rechte an diesen Fotos und wollte sie der Gemeinschaft nicht vorenthalten. Viele Grüße aus Hamburg.
I'm trying to translate:
Hello, the photos were taken by my father (born in 1912, died in 1998). As his heir, I have taken possession of these and other photos and uploaded them to Commons. I therefore hold all rights to these photos and did not want to withhold them from the community. Best regards from Hamburg, Eduard47 (talk) 13:57, 30 November 2025 (UTC)
Thanks for the clarity. I think because you're using the template {{own}}, which explicitly implies "Use this to say that you personally created the entire original image by yourself" and is why I was confused, as clearly, you did not personally create the work, even if you inherited the copyright.
It is appreciated that you opted to make them available for free public use. Maybe consider a different, more appropriate source template from Category:Multilingual tags: Source? Bungle (talkcontribs) 21:28, 2 December 2025 (UTC)
...but which ones??? Eduard47 (talk) 08:44, 3 December 2025 (UTC)
Perhaps any you have uploaded which you didn't actually create yourself? Bungle (talkcontribs) 13:02, 7 December 2025 (UTC)