Commons:FPC

Skip to current candidates Skip to current candidates

Featured picture candidates

Featured picture candidates are images that the community will vote on, to determine whether or not they will be highlighted as some of the finest on Commons. This page lists the candidates to become featured pictures. The picture of the day images are selected from featured pictures.

Old candidates for featured pictures are listed in the log pages and in the candidate archives. There are also chronological lists of featured pictures: 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025, 2026 and current month.

For another overview of our finest pictures, take a look at our annual picture of the year election.

Formal things

Nominating

Guidelines for nominators

Please read the complete guidelines before nominating.

This is a summary of what to look for when submitting and reviewing FP candidates:

  • Licensing – Images licensed with solely "GFDL" or "GFDL and an NC-only license" are not acceptable due the restrictions placed on re-use by these licenses.
  • Resolution – Raster images of lower resolution than 2 million pixels (pixels, not bytes) are typically rejected unless there are strong mitigating reasons. This does not apply to vector graphics (SVGs).
    • Graphics on Commons are not only viewed on conventional computer screens. They may be used in high-resolution print versions, and the images may be cropped to focus on portions of the image. See Commons:Why we need high resolution media for more information.
  • Scans – While not official policy, Help:Scanning provides advice on the preparation of various types of images that may be useful.
  • General quality – pictures being nominated should be of high technical quality.
  • Digital manipulations must not deceive the viewer. Digital manipulation for the purpose of correcting flaws in an image is generally acceptable, provided it is limited, well-done, and not intended to deceive.
    • For photographs, typical acceptable manipulations include cropping, perspective correction, sharpening/blurring, and color/exposure correction. More extensive manipulations, such as removal of distracting background elements, should be clearly described in the image text, by means of the {{Retouched picture}} template. Undescribed or mis-described manipulations which cause the main subject to be misrepresented are never acceptable. For images made from more than one photo, you can use the {{Panorama}} or {{Focus stacked image}} templates.
    • For historic images, acceptable manipulations might include digitally fixing rips, removal of stains, cleanup of dirt, and, for mass-produced artworks such as engravings, removal of flaws inherent to the particular reproduction, such as over-inking. Careful color adjustments may be used to bring out the original work from the signs of ageing, though care should be taken to restore a natural appearance. The original artistic intent should be considered when deciding whether it is appropriate to make a change. Edits to historic material should be documented in detail within the file description, and an unedited version should be uploaded and cross linked for comparison.
  • Value – our main goal is to feature most valuable pictures from all others. Pictures should be in some way special, so please be aware that:
    • almost all sunsets are aesthetically pleasing, and most such pictures are not in essence different from others,
    • night-shots are pretty but normally more details can be shown on pictures taken at daytime,
    • beautiful does not always mean valuable.
Artworks, illustrations, and historical documents

There are many different types of non-photographic media, including engravings, watercolors, paintings, etchings, and various others. Hence, it is difficult to set hard-and-fast guidelines. However, generally speaking, works can be divided into three types: Those that can be scanned, those that must be photographed, and those specifically created to illustrate a subject.

Works that must be photographed include most paintings, sculptures, works too delicate or too unique to allow them to be put on a scanner, and so on. For these, the requirements for photography, below, may be mostly followed; however, it should be noted that photographs which cut off part of the original painting are generally not considered featurable.

Works that may be scanned include most works created by processes that allow for mass distribution − for instance, illustrations published with novels. For these, it is generally accepted that a certain amount of extra manipulation is permissible to remove flaws inherent to one copy of the work, since the particular copy – of which hundreds, or even thousands of copies also exist – is not so important as the work itself.

Works created to serve a purpose include diagrams, scientific illustrations, and demonstrations of contemporary artistic styles. For these, the main requirement is that they serve their purpose well.

Provided the reproduction is of high quality, an artwork generally only needs one of the following four things to be featurable:

  • Notable in its own right: Works by major artists, or works that are otherwise notable, such as the subjects of a controversy.
  • Of high artistic merit: Works which, while not particularly well known, are nonetheless wonderful examples of their particular type or school of art.
  • Of high historic merit: The historical method values very early illustrations of scenes and events over later ones. Hence, a work of poor quality depicting a contemporaneous historical event can be nonetheless important, even if the artistic merit is relatively low. Likewise, scans or photographs of important documents – which may not be at all artistic – nonetheless may be highly valuable if the documents are historically significant. The reason for the image's historical importance should be briefly stated in the nomination, for those reviewers unfamiliar with the subject.
  • Of high illustrative merit: Works that illustrate or help explain notable subjects, for instance, illustrations of books, scientific subjects, or technical processes. The amount of artistic merit required for these will vary by subject, but, for instance, an illustration that makes the working of a complicated piece of machinery very clear need not be notable as a piece of artwork as well, whereas an illustration for a book might well be expected to reach much higher artistic standards.

Digital restorations must also be well documented. An unedited version of the image should be uploaded locally, when possible, and cross-linked from the file description page. Edit notes should be specified in detail, such as "Rotated and cropped. Dirt, scratches, and stains removed. Histogram adjusted and colors balanced."

Photographs

On the technical side, we have focus, exposure, composition, movement control and depth of field.

  • Focus – every important object in the picture should normally be sharp.
  • Exposure refers to the shutter diaphragm combination that renders an image with a tonal curve that ideally is able to represent in acceptable detail shadows and highlights within the image. This is called latitude. Images can be on the low side of the tonal curve (low range), the middle (middle range) or high side (upper range). Lack of shadow detail is not necessarily a negative characteristic. In fact, it can be part of the desired effect. Burned highlights in large areas are a distracting element.
  • Composition refers to the arrangement of the elements within the image. The "Rule of thirds" is one useful guideline. Horizons should almost never be placed in the middle, where they "cut" the image in half. Often, a horizon creating a top or bottom third of the space works better. The main idea is to use space to create a dynamic image.
    • Foreground and background – foreground and background objects may be distracting. You should check that something in front of the subject doesn't hide important elements and that something in background doesn't spoil the composition (for example that the streetlight doesn't "stand" on someone's head).
  • Movement control refers to the manner in which motion is represented in the image. Motion can be frozen or blurred. Neither one is better than the other. It is the intention of representation. Movement is relative within the objects of the image. For example, photographing a race car that appears frozen in relation to the background does not give us a sense of speed or motion, so technique dictates to represent the car in a frozen manner but with a blurred background, thus creating the sense of motion, this is called "panning". On the other hand, representing a basketball player in a high jump frozen in relation to everything else, due to the "unnatural" nature of the pose would be a good photograph.
  • Depth of field (DOF) refers to the area in focus in front of and beyond main subject. Depth of field is chosen according to the specific needs of every picture. Large or small DOF can either way add or subtract to the quality of the image. Low depth of field can be used to bring attention to the main subject, separating it from the general environment. High depth of field can be used to emphasize space. Short focal length lenses (wide angles) yield large DOF, and vice versa, long focal lenses (telephotos) have shallow DOF. Small apertures yield large DOF and conversely, large apertures yield shallow DOF.

On the graphic elements we have shape, volume, color, texture, perspective, balance, proportion, noise, etc.

  • Shape refers to the contour of the main subjects.
  • Volume refers to the three dimensional quality of the object. This is accomplished using side light. Contrary to general belief, front lighting is not the best light. It tends to flatten subject. Best light of day is early morning or late afternoon.
  • Color is important. Oversaturated colors are not good.
  • Texture refers to the quality of the surface of the subject. It is enhanced by side lighting… it is the "feel" to the touch.
  • Perspective refers to the "angle" accompanied by lines that disappear into a vanishing point that may or may not be inside the image.
  • Balance refers to the arrangement of subjects within the image that can either give equal weight or appear to be heavier on one side.
  • Proportion refers to the relation of size of objects in picture. Generally, we tend to represent small objects small in relation to others, but a good technique is to represent small objects large contrary to natural size relationship. For example, a small flower is given preponderance over a large mountain…. This is called inversion of scales.
Not all elements must be present. Some photographs can be judged on individual characteristics, that is, an image can be about color or texture, or color AND texture, etc.
  • Noise refers to unwanted corruption of color brightness and quality and can be caused by underexposure. It is not a desirable quality and can be grounds for opposition.
  • Symbolic meaning or relevance … Opinion wars can begin here … A bad picture of a very difficult subject is better than a good picture of an ordinary subject. A good picture of a difficult subject is an extraordinary photograph.
Images can be culturally biased by the photographer and/or the observer. The meaning of the image should be judged according to the cultural context of the image, not by the cultural context of the observer. An image "speaks" to people, and it has the capacity to evoke emotion such as tenderness, rage, rejection, happiness, sadness, etc. Good photographs are not limited to evoking pleasant sensations …

You will maximise the chances of your nominations succeeding if you read the complete guidelines before nominating.

Video and audio

Please nominate videos, sounds, music, PDFs, etc. at Commons:Featured media candidates.

Set nominations

If a group of images are thematically connected in a direct and obvious way, they can be nominated together as a set. A set should fall under one of the following types:

  • Faithful digital reproductions of works notable in their own right, which the original author clearly intended to be viewed as a set. Examples: pages in a pamphlet, crops (puzzle pieces) of a prohibitively large scan, a pair of pendant paintings. Not acceptable: Arbitrary selection of sample works by an artist.
  • A sequence of images showing the passage of time. They could depict frames of a moving/changing object or a static object during different times of day or different seasons. Examples: diagrams illustrating a process, steps of a dance, metamorphosis of an insect, maps/drawings/photos of the same subject over the years (frame of view should be more or less the same).
  • A group of images depicting the same subject from different viewpoints, preferably taken under the same lighting conditions when possible. Examples: Exterior and interior of a building, different facades of a building, different interior views, obverse and inverse of a banknote/coin. Not acceptable: A selection of different rooms in a skyscraper, the facade of a church plus an organ, any images of fundamentally different scopes.
  • A group of images which show all possible variations of a particular class of object. Examples: Male and female versions of an animal (preferably in the same setting), all known species of a genus. Not acceptable: A few breeds of cats (unless they share a defining characteristic and represent all possible examples of that).


Adding a new nomination

If you believe that you have found or created an image that could be considered valuable, with appropriate name, quality, image description, categories and licensing, then do the following.

Step 1: copy the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Your image filename.jpg. Then click on the "create new nomination" button.

All single files:

For renominations, simply add /2 after the filename. For example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Foo.jpg/2

All set nomination pages should begin "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/", e.g. "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/My Nomination".


Step 2: follow the instructions on the page that you are taken to, and save that page.

Step 3: manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list: Click here, and add the following line to the TOP of the nominations list:

{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Your image filename.jpg}}

Nominations are time-sensitive and for one-time use only. An automatic clock starts as soon as they are created. Do not create them in advance, save them for later or re-activate them.

Galleries and FP categories: Please add a gallery page and section heading from the list at Commons FP galleries. Write the code as Page name#Section heading. For example: Commons:Featured pictures/Sports#Individual sports An image will only appear ONE time in the galleries. After a successful nomination, the image can be placed in several of the Featured pictures categories.

Optional: if you are not the creator of the image, please notify them using {{subst:FPC-notice|Your image filename.jpg}} -- ~~~~.

Note: Do not add an 'Alternative' image when you create a nomination. Selecting the best image is part of the nomination process. Alternatives are for a different crop or post-processing of the original image, or a closely related image from the same photo session (limited to 1 per nomination), if they are suggested by voters. They should be added by, or at the request of, the nominator.

An 'Alternative' is created by adding a sub-section to the nomination page: ====Alternative==== [[File:Foo.jpg|300px]] *{{info}} A short description.

Voting

Editors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 100 constructive, stable edits on Commons (excluding user and talk pages) can vote. Everybody can vote for their own nominations. Anonymous (IP) votes are not allowed.

You may use the following templates:

  • {{Support}} ( Support),
  • {{Oppose}} ( Oppose),
  • {{Neutral}} ( Neutral),
  • {{Comment}} ( Comment),
  • {{Info}} ( Info),
  • {{Question}} ( Question),
  • {{Request}} ( Request).

You may indicate that the image has no chance of success with the template {{FPX|reason - ~~~~}}, where reason explains why the image is clearly unacceptable as a FP. The template can only be used when there are no support votes other than the one from the nominator.

A well-written review helps participants (photographers, nominators and reviewers) improve their skills by providing insight into the strengths and weaknesses of a picture. Explain your reasoning, especially when opposing a candidate (which has been carefully selected by the author/nominator). English is the most widely understood language on Commons, but any language may be used in your review. A helpful review will often reference one or more of the criteria listed above.

Unhelpful reasons for opposing include:

  • No reason
  • "I don't like it" and other empty assessments
  • "You can do better" and other criticisms of the author/nominator rather than the image

Remember also to put your signature (~~~~).

Over time, featured picture standards change. It may be decided that for some pictures which were formerly "good enough", this is no longer the case. This is for listing an image which you believe no longer deserves to be a featured picture. For these, vote:

Text to use Displays as Meaning
{{Keep}}  Keep It deserves to remain a featured picture.
{{Delist}}  Delist It does not deserve to be a featured picture anymore.

This can also be used for cases in which a previous version of an image was promoted to FP, but a newer version of the image has been made and is believed to be superior to the old version, e.g. a newly edited version of a photo or a new scan of a historical image. In particular, it is not intended for replacing older photos of a particular subject with newer photos of the same subject, or in any other case where the current FP and the proposed replacement are essentially different images. For these nominations, vote:

Text to use Displays as Meaning
{{Keep}}  Keep Do not replace the old image with the new image as a FP.
{{Delistandreplace}}  Delist and replace Replace the current FP with the proposed replacement.

If you believe that some picture no longer meets the criteria for FP, you can nominate it for delisting, copying the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box:


In the new delisting nomination page just created you should include:

  • Information on the origin of the image (creator, uploader);
  • A link to the original FP nomination (it will appear under "Links" on the image description page);
  • Your reasons for nominating the image and your username.

After that, you have to manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list.

As a courtesy, leave an informative note on the talk page(s) of the original creator, uploader(s), and nominator with a link to the delisting candidate. {{subst:FPC-notice-removal}} can be used for this purpose.

General rules

  1. The voting period is 9 complete days counted from the nomination. After the end of this period the result will be determined. Votes added on day 10 and after are not counted.
  2. Nominations by anonymous contributors are welcome.
  3. Contributions to discussion by anonymous contributors are welcome.
  4. Only registered contributors whose Commons accounts have at least 10 days and 100 constructive, stable edits on Commons (excluding user and talk pages) can vote. Exception: registered users can always vote in their own nominations no matter the account age and number of edits.
  5. Nominations do not count as votes. Support must be explicitly stated.
  6. Nominators and authors can withdraw their nominated pictures at any time. This is done by adding the following template: {{Withdraw}} ~~~~. Also, remember that if more than one version is nominated, you should explicitly state which version you are withdrawing.
  7. Remember, the goal of the Wikimedia Commons project is to provide a central repository for free images to be used by all Wikimedia projects, including possible future projects. This is not simply a repository for Wikipedia images, so images should not be judged here on their suitability for that project.
  8. Rules of the 5th day based on vote counts on day number 5 (day of nomination + 5):
    1. Pictures are speedy declined if they have fewer than two support votes.
    2. Pictures are speedy promoted if they have 10 support votes or more and no oppose votes. (Note that if it takes more than five days to reach this threshold, the picture can be promoted as soon as it is reached.) This does not apply to nominations containing at least one ‘Alternative’ image – because it is possible that another image can overtake the one in the lead during the last days, such nominations are never closed early.
    3. Once either speedy criterion is reached, the voting period is considered closed, and no more votes may be added.
  9. Pictures tagged {{FPX}} may be removed from the list 24 hours after the tag was applied, provided there are no support votes other than that of the nominator.
  10. Pictures tagged {{FPD}} (FP-Denied) may be removed from the list 24 hours after the tag was applied.
  11. Only two active nominations by the same user (that is, nominations under review and not yet closed) are allowed. The main purpose of this measure is to contribute to a better average quality of nominations, by driving nominators/creators to choose carefully the pictures presented to the forum.

Featuring and delisting rules

A candidate will become a featured picture in compliance with following conditions:

  1. Appropriate license (of course)
  2. At least seven  Support votes (or 7  Delist votes for a delist) at the end of nine days
  3. Ratio of supporting/opposing votes at least 2/1 (a two-thirds majority); same for delist/keep votes
  4. Two different versions of the same picture cannot both be featured, but only the one with higher level of support, as determined by the closer. Whenever the closer is not sure which version has consensus to be featured, they should attempt to contact the voters to clarify their opinions if not clear from the nomination page.
  5. Only two active delisting nominations per user, which is in addition to the limit of two active regular nominations.

The delisting rules are the same as those for FPs, with voting taking place over the same time period. The rule of the 5th day is applied to delisting candidates that have received no votes to delist, other than that of the proposer, by day 5.

The FPCBot handles the vote counting and closing in most cases, current exceptions are candidates containing multiple versions (“alternatives”) of the image as well as delist-and-replace nominations. Any experienced user may close the requests not handled by the bot. For instructions on how to close nominations, see Commons:Featured picture candidates/What to do after voting is finished. Also note that there is a manual review stage between when the bot has counted the votes and before the nomination is finally closed by the bot; this manual review can be done by any user familiar with the voting rules. Hint: Until summer 2025, the bot was also not able to process FPXed, FPDed and withdrawn nominations as well as delist nominations; this has been fixed, users do not need to close such nominations anymore.

Above all, be polite

Please don't forget that the image you are judging is somebody's work. Avoid using phrases like "it looks terrible" and "I hate it". If you must oppose, please do so with consideration. Also remember that your command of English might not be the same as someone else's. Choose your words with care.

Happy judging… and remember… all rules can be broken.

See also

Table of contents

List may contain works considered Not Safe for Work (nudity).

Nominators are requested, out of courtesy, to include the {{Nsfw}} template with such images. Users may select the gadget in user preferences "Deferred display of images tagged with {{Nsfw}} on COM:FPC" to enable the template's effect of hiding the image until selected.

Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache

File:Chapelle des Crosets et dents du Midi.jpg

Voting period ends on 14 Apr 2026 at 17:29:03 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Les Crosets chapel

Orion Nebula multiband study

Voting period ends on 14 Apr 2026 at 08:48:49 (UTC)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page

  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Astronomy#Nebulae
  •  Info These images are the result of over 17 hours of gathered data across four panels and six bands (IR, red, green, blue, H-alpha, [O III]), showcasing a variety of different ways that an astrophotographic target like the Orion Nebula may be processed. All images are aligned pixel for pixel for use in animations/blink comparisons. Created, uploaded, and nominated by yours truly. —brainandforce [yap] 08:48, 5 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Abstain as author. If anyone wants a crack at the data, just ask. —brainandforce [yap] 08:48, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Moscow - 2026 - Window of the Palace of Alexei Mikhailovich in Kolomenskoe.jpg

Voting period ends on 14 Apr 2026 at 07:56:42 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Black-necked Stork

Voting period ends on 14 Apr 2026 at 07:49:55 (UTC)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page

File:Half geopende bladknop van een paardenkastanje (Aesculus) 29-03-2026. (d.j.b).jpg

Voting period ends on 14 Apr 2026 at 04:21:24 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • ✓ Done. Small correction. Thanks for your reviews.--Famberhorst (talk) 11:29, 5 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Acceptable. Thanks.--Ermell (talk) 16:34, 5 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support -- XRay 💬 17:45, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Sommet du Grammont.jpg

Voting period ends on 13 Apr 2026 at 22:25:31 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Summit of Grammont
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Switzerland#Valais
  •  Info all by Christian David -- Espandero (talk) 22:25, 4 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support -- Espandero (talk) 22:25, 4 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Comment Some (sharpening ?) fringes around the birds.--Jebulon (talk) 23:06, 4 April 2026 (UTC)
    Jebulon: from what I can see on Lightroom, the fringes are from the lighting settings that, for an unknown reason, don't seem to change much about the color in the pixel-wide border between the birds and the sky. So the fringes are close to the same color as the sky on the original raw file. I've tried to put a thin mask around the birds and I've managed to correct some of it, but it's a tricky one because it's really thin! --Espandero (talk) 17:00, 5 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Thanks for answering. maybe a cloning with GIMP could work ?--Jebulon (talk) 19:31, 5 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Very nice layout.--Ermell (talk) 08:14, 5 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Per Ermell. Also, pleasant lighting and colors. --Aciarium ⚒ (talk) 11:11, 5 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support -- XRay 💬 17:46, 5 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Beautiful view... The birds, the cross, the people. It reminds us of Christ and the Holy Spirit! --heylenny (talk/edits) 19:36, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Montpensier et de Galliera, Antoine d'Orléans, duc de, Gallica, Nadar.jpg

Voting period ends on 13 Apr 2026 at 14:33:15 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#People
  •  Info created by Nadar and workshop – uploaded, restored and by nominated by Jebulon -- Jebulon (talk) 14:33, 4 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Portrait photograph of HRH prince Antoine d'Orléans, son of king of the French Louis-Philippe 1st and Queen Maria-Amelia of Bourbon - Two Sicilies, Duke of Montpensier and Duke of Galliera, Infant of Spain (1824-1890). Please have a look on the file page to consider the steps of the restoration, which was particularly difficult. Both of the subject and the improvements are the reasons of this nomination.-- Jebulon (talk) 14:33, 4 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:27, 4 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Awesome job! I compared the restored and original side-by-side and was quite impressed. How long did it take you? JayCubby (talk) 20:11, 4 April 2026 (UTC)
    Some hours in several days I would say. Method, calm, good baroque music, I uploaded the steps of this work thinking of you, I imagined you would be interested. And I chose one of the most difficult picture I could find. Jebulon (talk) 22:57, 4 April 2026 (UTC)
    You did well (I often upload in multiple steps to allow easy reversal if I muck something up or lose the PSD, both of which I am very good at). JayCubby (talk) 01:47, 5 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --Thi (talk) 22:40, 4 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Chechia Maker in his shop.jpg

Voting period ends on 13 Apr 2026 at 11:06:47 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Chechia maker in his shop: Tunisia is famous with its traditional red hat called Chechia.
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Work
  •  Info all by me -- IssamBarhoumi (talk) 11:06, 4 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Abstain as author -- IssamBarhoumi (talk) 11:06, 4 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Very good, sharp and colorful. Not that common. Mention of personality rights is missing--Jebulon (talk) 14:36, 4 April 2026 (UTC)
    Thank you I added the missing personality rights. IssamBarhoumi (talk) 16:59, 4 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:26, 4 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Nice composition. TheBritinator (talk) 17:34, 4 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Joydeep (Talk) 18:37, 4 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --Ermell (talk) 21:02, 4 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕️ 08:18, 5 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Comment One of the better people-in-a-workshop nominations. Could you please add some more specific categories (what, where, who, when)? Just one category is a little scarse. --Aciarium ⚒ (talk) 11:16, 5 April 2026 (UTC)
    I added the related Categories and Improved the description.
    In fact he is in his shop in medina of Tunis in the grand souk of Chechias: chechia makers are everyday there doing stuff related to chechia artifacts. IssamBarhoumi (talk) 12:18, 5 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Comment This was shot with a 42 MP camera, is there a reason this photo is only 11 MP? If not, it would be great if you could upload the highest resolution version available. AVDLCZ (talk) 13:16, 5 April 2026 (UTC)
    I uploaded a better file size. I think the prévious export has issues. IssamBarhoumi (talk) 23:10, 5 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 19:33, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Great Grey Shrike in Bhigwan August 2025 by Tisha Mukherjee 02.jpg

Voting period ends on 13 Apr 2026 at 08:49:35 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Lanius excubitor (Great Grey Shrike)

File:Cherry blossoms (Somei Yoshino), Nagai Botanical Garden, April 2026 -1488.jpg

Voting period ends on 12 Apr 2026 at 23:17:50 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Cherry blossoms (Somei Yoshino)

File:Earth From the Perspective of Artemis II.jpg

Voting period ends on 12 Apr 2026 at 16:55:16 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Earth From the Perspective of Artemis II
  •  Comment -- @GumballNine1Nine: This is not, in fact, a "fully illuminated Earth". It is a photo of the Earth's night side. The illumination in the shot comes from the Moon, not the Sun (which was behind the Earth at this time). I believe the oppose votes have in part be influenced by the wrong assumption that this photo was taken in daylight. Renerpho (talk) 23:45, 4 April 2026 (UTC)
    Sorry for the mistake, I've corrected the info. GumballNine1Nine (talk) 16:27, 5 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support -- GumballNine1Nine (talk) 16:55, 3 April 2026 (UTC)
     Support GioviPen GP msg 17:13, 3 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Inter-rede (talk) 17:53, 3 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Oppose We have already seventeen promotted pictures in the Category:Featured pictures of Earth from space, among them some are far much better, this one is very noisy and not that sharp.--Jebulon (talk) 19:51, 3 April 2026 (UTC)
    •  Comment As others have noted (and also the updated info), this is not only a visually unique image of the Earth, but also historical which sets this image apart from the other pictures in that category GumballNine1Nine (talk) 16:50, 5 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Unique in that this is the night side of the Earth with the sun eclipsed: stars are visible in the background, as well as city lights and aurorae (and maybe some zodiacal light?). Perhaps there will be a better image available soon, but I'd guess we can just delist this one and replace it. —brainandforce [yap] 22:08, 3 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support for historicity, as per B&F. JayCubby (talk) 23:21, 3 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Terrible quality. Alvesgaspar (talk) 23:32, 3 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Comment File:Artemis II Captures the Terminator Line (art002e000190).jpg is of better quality (but different composition) and from the same source. ★ 05:15, 4 April 2026 (UTC)
     Comment That's the bright side of the Earth though, so it is expected that the image is less noisy. dllu (talk) 06:07, 4 April 2026 (UTC)
    @ArionStar: That image is a lot less interesting. In fact, it's just like any other view of a half-illuminated Earth (unlike the shot in the image which shows the Earth in moonlight). Renerpho (talk) 23:50, 4 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Historical and newsworthy capture. As mentioned by several commenters above, the reason why this was shot at 1/4 s and ISO 51200 is because it is the dark (night) side of the Earth. None of the other photos in Category:Featured pictures of Earth from space have this property apart from some satellite photos that were scanned with specialized cameras. dllu (talk) 06:02, 4 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Oppose. I'm not convinced about the quality. Is it really the best possible version of this Nikon D5–taken photograph? It was created literally yesterday, I'm sure we can wait a few days until we figure this out. Yacàwotçã (talk) 06:57, 4 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Too soon. Please wait for some time. NASA may already have better images from Artemis II than this poor copy. And they will certainly have. Yann (talk) 09:13, 4 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Not yet. Not until a higher quality version comes out. TheBritinator (talk) 14:45, 4 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support The oppose votes don't take into account that this is a long exposure of the Earth's night side, illuminated by the Moon rather than the Sun (compare File:Artemis II Captures Dark Side of the Earth.jpg for a shorter exposure of the same scene). The "terrible quality" is in comparison to a different kind of photo, and is really comparing apples to oranges. We have never seen an image of Earth quite like this; for example, it is one of the few images that have an exposure time long enough to see stars. The Apollo missions never got a chance to take a photo like this, because they had to launch towards the new Moon (with the fully illuminated Earth behind them). There's so much going on (from city lights on the ground over the planet Venus to the zodiacal light, aurora over the north and south pole, etc.) that makes this a very unusual photo. There will be no higher quality version of this; there was one chance to take that photo, hand-held, with the highest ISO setting and longest exposure time the photographer could manage. NASA talked about the eclipse in the build-up to the launch, and this geometry is unlikely to be repeated in upcoming Artemis launches. In short, I support as a unique photograph. Renerpho (talk) 23:45, 4 April 2026 (UTC)
    There's also a disturbing reflection/lens flare in the middle of the image (see the note). ★ 00:01, 5 April 2026 (UTC)
    @ArionStar: It looks like a reflection to me (something inside the capsule, being reflected in the window). I agree that it's a bit distracting, but again, it's the best that is possible for this kind of shot. We should always ask for images of a reasonably good quality, but I argue that this image meets that criterion -- with all the artifacts it has. Renerpho (talk) 00:06, 5 April 2026 (UTC)
    The off-center crop doesn't help… ★ 01:18, 5 April 2026 (UTC)
    It's not an off-center crop. It's cropped just so that Venus and the zodiacal light aren't cut off. Renerpho (talk) 14:10, 5 April 2026 (UTC)
    @ArionStar by nitpicking about the reflection and the off-center crop, you're missing the point that Renerpho is making, which is that this is a unique and irreplaceable photo of historical significance despite its technical flaws. We can all see that the photo is grainy and has reflections and other imperfections. But given the extraordinary circumstances, some of us believe that it should be featured, in accordance with the FPC guidelines which states that "Hence, a work of poor quality depicting a contemporaneous historical event can be nonetheless important, even if the artistic merit is relatively low." dllu (talk) 19:25, 5 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support for historicity. This is not a trivial photo! --heylenny (talk/edits) 19:32, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Greece Chiliadou Euboea boat.jpg

Voting period ends on 12 Apr 2026 at 16:35:50 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Chiliadou Beach in Euboea, Greece, is known for the beautiful coastline of the Egean sea, and for a (hidden) nudist small beach (here, behind me, the photographer). In this composition we have several levels, from the foreground to the background. I find it not that bad.
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Beaches
  •  Info all by Jebulon -- Jebulon (talk) 16:35, 3 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Chiliadou Beach in Euboea, Greece, is known for the beautiful coastline of the Egean sea, and for a (hidden) nudist small beach (here, behind me, the photographer). In this composition we have several levels, from the boat in foreground to the far background. I find it not that bad.-- Jebulon (talk) 16:35, 3 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Юрий Д.К. 13:24, 4 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 19:42, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Boeing 747 Jumbo front cockpit windows.jpg

Voting period ends on 12 Apr 2026 at 14:14:09 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Cockpit window of a Boeing 747-400 of ANA Airline

File:Lower Gate Stairs Bab Jemaa Taza Nov25 A7CR 09666.jpg

Voting period ends on 12 Apr 2026 at 13:40:17 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Bab Jemaa wall around old city, stairs leading down to new city. Taza, Morocco
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#Morocco
  •  Info 800-year old defensive wall at Bab Jemaa surrounding the old city of Taza on a hilltop; stairs leading down to the new city on the plains; Taza, Fez-Meknes, Morocco. Created by Tagooty – uploaded by Tagooty – nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 13:40, 3 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support -- Tagooty (talk) 13:40, 3 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support In my opinion, a nice mix of old and new.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:07, 3 April 2026 (UTC)
  • weak  Support I disagree with the crop of the tree at right as the original version shows the tree in entire size. oK for a crop, but not that important. and maybe I've cloned out the unfortunate tags, ugly. A good picture and composition otherwise, could be a FP--Jebulon (talk) 22:28, 3 April 2026 (UTC)
    Thanks for your review. I did not clone out the unfortunate graffiti on the wall as it shows a modern aspect of the ancient wall. Tagooty (talk) 04:48, 4 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Your decision makes sense. my taste is different !--Jebulon (talk) 10:02, 4 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support TheBritinator (talk) 14:47, 4 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:26, 4 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Nice composition, leading the spectator's view gently down towards the city. Yes, it were better if the tags weren't there, but I would definitely not clone them out to maintain the original view. --Aciarium ⚒ (talk) 15:25, 5 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 19:43, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Lesser grass blue (Zizina otis) on Hibiscus flower Koror.jpg

Voting period ends on 12 Apr 2026 at 10:13:12 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Lesser grass blue (Zizina otis) on Hibiscus

File:Portage III.JPG

Voting period ends on 12 Apr 2026 at 10:09:56 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Place du Portage III

File:(Polsterdatud) mööblit konserveerimas.jpg

Voting period ends on 11 Apr 2026 at 22:19:37 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The daily work of an upholstery conservator
  • I added personality rights warning. Kruusamägi (talk) 10:03, 3 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Question Interesting. Do you have a version with more space at the top (Chair not cut)? Thanks, Yann (talk) 16:48, 3 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Good illustration of an artisan working but image quality should be much better. Alvesgaspar (talk) 20:52, 3 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support For the composition. ★ 02:10, 5 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Tomer T (talk) 08:14, 5 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Oppose QI, much more missing to be FP- light, crop (chair above is choped), her gesture... she could work instead of... --Mile (talk) 17:31, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Question mark nebula.jpg

Voting period ends on 11 Apr 2026 at 22:18:54 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Question mark nebula

File:Seville, Plaza de España (38625005691) (edited).jpg

Voting period ends on 11 Apr 2026 at 18:47:44 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Seville, Plaza de España

File:Decorated one-humped Camel, Camelus dromedarius, at Puri Sea Beach, Odisha, India.jpg

Voting period ends on 11 Apr 2026 at 18:20:44 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Decorated one-humped Camel, ‘‘Camelus dromedarius’’, at Puri Sea Beach, Odisha, India.
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family_:_Camelidae_(Camelids)
  •  Info Decorated one-humped Camel, Camelus dromedarius, at Puri Sea Beach, Odisha, India. Created, uploaded, nominated by -- Joydeep (Talk) 18:20, 2 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Abstain as author-- Joydeep (Talk) 18:20, 2 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Comment Very good overall, if it weren't for that strangely-lit area between the ladder and the legs (I have added a note to the image to pinpoint it). I assume this is a masking error and could therefore be fixed? --Aciarium ⚒ (talk) 09:17, 3 April 2026 (UTC)
    Thank you. I have reprocessed the file from RAW. -- ̃ ̃ ̃ ̃ Joydeep (Talk) 12:06, 3 April 2026 (UTC)
    It is still there. --Yann (talk) 16:52, 3 April 2026 (UTC)
    Is the issue resolved now? Please take a look at the image again. Joydeep (Talk) 11:02, 4 April 2026 (UTC)
    I think it is from inconsistent masking to fix the high contrast and lift dark shadowy areas. That’s all acceptable but the masking is not very well done. @Joydeep: perhaps you could upload the RAW separately, or email it to me, I would like to take a stab at it. Otherwise please apply a different mask. UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:35, 3 April 2026 (UTC)
    Is the issue resolved now? Please take a look at the image again. Joydeep (Talk) 11:02, 4 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Comment Striking, colourful image. I think the Gallery should be "Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family_:_Camelidae_(Camelids)". --Tagooty (talk) 13:48, 3 April 2026 (UTC)
    Done. Joydeep (Talk) 13:55, 3 April 2026 (UTC)
     Support Thanks --Tagooty (talk) 13:57, 3 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support ★ 02:10, 5 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 19:43, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Picking tea in Rwanda.jpg

Voting period ends on 11 Apr 2026 at 08:18:13 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Picture of a woman harvesting tea in Rwanda

File:Knoppen van een es (Fraxinus excelsior). 03-03-2026. (actm.) 01.jpg

Voting period ends on 11 Apr 2026 at 04:24:50 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Compianto Niccolò dell'Arca Bologna September 2025-6.jpg

Voting period ends on 10 Apr 2026 at 21:21:08 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Lamentation over the dead Christ, by Niccolò dell' Arca
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Sculptures indoors
  •  Info Lamentation over the dead Christ (Compianto sul Cristo morto), by Niccolò dell' Arca, in the church of Santa Maria dela Vita, Bologna. I was deeply impressed by this 15th century's terracota sculpture, as the pain and dispair expressed by the faces and postures of the figures is very uncommon among the contemporaneous paintings and sculptures. Because it was taken with a small hand-held camera, under difficult light conditions, image quality is not the best. All by Alvesgaspar (talk) 21:21, 1 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 21:21, 1 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Question Why a montage instead of a set nomination? --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 21:54, 1 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Info Because I wanted the different views of the same subject to be viewed and used together. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 14:00, 2 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Comment The file size is quite large (2 MB per million pixels, but 0.5mb/MPX is reasonable). I think there is some color space issue. On Chrome, the lighting is sort of washed-out, but if I open it in another program, there is more contrast and saturation. I looked at the metadata, it uses the ISOCoatedV2 CMYK profile, which is intended for printing. JayCubby (talk) 17:37, 2 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Hyundai Ioniq Three Concept IAA 2025 DSC 2364.jpg

Voting period ends on 10 Apr 2026 at 18:21:04 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Rear view camera of the concept car Hyundai Ioniq Three Concept. Image taken at Munich Motor Show 2025.
  •  Comment @PetarM: Thanks for your comment; there is a new version online (). Do I have to nominate the new version again, or is there an option for changing the nomination here?--Alexander-93 (talk) 20:28, 4 April 2026 (UTC)
    I would be more sparing with the dust removal, like this. JayCubby (talk) 21:59, 4 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Comment Dust is still there, recover and put again. @JayCubby ajaj, that site and opening your shot. Put on drive. --Mile (talk) 17:28, 5 April 2026 (UTC)
    @PetarM, if you are having trouble with the link (I don't fully understand you), it is at here too JayCubby (talk) 18:37, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Ireland Cliffs of Moher BW 2025-09-11 13-46-22.jpg

Voting period ends on 10 Apr 2026 at 15:03:28 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

O'Brien's Tower at the cliffs of Moher

File:Поранешно училиште во Бељаковце.jpg

Voting period ends on 10 Apr 2026 at 07:34:18 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A granary in the former school building in the village of Beljakovce
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#North Macedonia
  •  Info This pictures tells the story of how demographic decline changes social institutions over time. Beljakovce's population reduced from 807 in 1961 to 54 in 2021 and was practically left with no children to sustain the normal functioning of the school. As a result, the school was closed decades ago and re-purposed to a granary. All by me. -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 07:34, 1 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 07:34, 1 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Lovely atmosphere, this old house shines in the sun. -- JackyM59 (talk) 11:11, 1 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 21:49, 1 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Very nice.--Don (talk) 07:29, 2 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --Llez (talk) 09:15, 2 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:20, 2 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 10:59, 2 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Very nice. TheBritinator (talk) 14:34, 2 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Technically good, even excellent (but easy to take). However, a squared recent ruined house looks very trivial for me, nothing appealing, and it is only my opinion.--Jebulon (talk) 00:01, 3 April 2026 (UTC)
  • @Jebulon: I don't think it's just a 'squared recent ruined house'. This picture has a strong social component and testifies how demographic decline changes social institutions over time. As a result of the decreased number of children in the village (the population declined from 807 in 1961 to 54 in 2021), the school was closed and re-purposed from an educational to a commercial institution. In my opinion, we don't have enough featured pictures with simple compositions that tell such stories. I apologise if the brief description wasn't enough to get the overall picture of this motif, so I've expanded the info section at the beginning of this nomination. Anyway, your opinion is fair. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 07:04, 3 April 2026 (UTC)
    • @Kiril Simeonovski: I understand very well your meaning. We have in France many and many abandoned buildings like this one or similar, due to the same civilization changes (I own one). I guess that if you nominate it as FPC, you imagine that it deserves the FP label, for reasons ! I hope I did not hurt you. anyway, this one will be promotted soon, so, no offense. this is my feeling, for archives.--Jebulon (talk) 12:55, 3 April 2026 (UTC)
      • It's absolutely fine. As I said, your opinion is fair. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 13:24, 3 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Mustard Growing in a Terraced Field in Ladakh, India (edit).jpg

Voting period ends on 10 Apr 2026 at 02:14:52 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Mustard Growing in a Terraced Field in Ladakh, India
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Agriculture#India
  •  Info created and uploaded by Chris Hunkeler – edited and nominated by UnpetitproleX (Talk) 02:14, 1 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support The contrast between the field and its stark surrounding gives this the feel of a yellow oasis in the (cold) desert. I edited to remove lens flare and soften the light some. -- UnpetitproleX (Talk) 02:14, 1 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Beautiful perspective and atmosphere --JackyM59 (talk) 11:10, 1 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 21:49, 1 April 2026 (UTC)
  • weak Oppose Beautiful, but the right part of image is very blurry, sorry. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 01:04, 2 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Oppose nice composition but lacks detail. Agree with Екатерина. -- E bailey (talk) 23:07, 2 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Weak support I've removed spots using Flickr original. Yes, not the best sharpness, but enought imho. Юрий Д.К. 13:17, 4 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 20:59, 4 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 19:27, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

Voting period ends on 9 Apr 2026 at 20:08:48 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Purple roller in Etosha National Park

Voting period ends on 9 Apr 2026 at 20:07:37 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Swallow-tailed bee-eater in Otjozondjupa Region

Voting period ends on 9 Apr 2026 at 16:28:31 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Paris peacock swallowtail on pagoda flower
  •  Support More to normal. --Mile (talk) 08:52, 1 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Dragon and phoenix roof ornaments at Sizihwan Temple of the Eighteen Lords, Kaohsiung, Taiwan 2026 03 29 1617.jpg

  •  Support --The Nature Box (talk) 14:54, 29 March 2026 (UTC)
  •  Comment The crop (composition) is not successful, in my view -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:28, 31 March 2026 (UTC)
     Oppose Per Basile. --Aciarium ⚒ (talk) 07:03, 31 March 2026 (UTC)
  •  Moral support for the nice artwork. ★ 03:39, 2 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Cut out wing at the left, busy upper left and lower right corners. Sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:02, 2 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Not convinced by the framing, sorry. TheBritinator (talk) 17:36, 4 April 2026 (UTC)

Voting period ends on 8 Apr 2026 at 20:41:39 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gate of the old Cambrai fortifications, built in 1623 when Northern France belonged to the Spanish Netherlands. The sun was added after the capture of Cambrai by Louis XIV in 1677. Here is an old photograph from the late 19th century Photographie d’Augustin Boutique.

Voting period ends on 8 Apr 2026 at 17:19:41 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

13th Century stone curvings at Konark Sun Temple Puri district, Odisha, India. The central figure in the lower niche is a multi-armed deity, likely a form of Shiva as Nataraja (the Lord of Dance) or an eight-armed Ardhanarishvara (the composite form of Shiva and Parvati). Both figures are prominently featured on the temple's outer walls.

File:Tuscan landscape with lonely tree.jpg

Voting period ends on 8 Apr 2026 at 15:50:17 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Italy
  •  Info Spring landscape in Asciano, Tuscany, Italy. Сreated by Eric Kilby – uploaded/nominated by me Юрий Д.К. 15:50, 30 March 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Юрий Д.К. 15:50, 30 March 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support When we think of Tuscany, we usually remember the gentle landscape of the Chianti with vineyards, olive groves, beautiful villages and … many tourists, like us ;–). But southeast of Siena the Crete Senesi give a completely different and very unique sight: a minimalist landscape of elegantly curved hills and valleys, consisting entirely of endless fields, broken up only here and there by a cypress tree or a farmhouse. The rugged charm of this region is much harder to capture, and I think this photo is a very successful representation. – Aristeas (talk) 09:59, 31 March 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:38, 31 March 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:51, 31 March 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Wonderful! --Yann (talk) 12:59, 31 March 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:28, 31 March 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 20:11, 31 March 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Ermell (talk) 07:03, 1 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 07:28, 1 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Lovely landscape, but the tree has a visible halo in full size view. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 00:54, 2 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Not impresed neither. Weather as 1st, crop, Exif ? --Mile (talk) 10:22, 2 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I like very much the gently curved surface and the green coverage, but not the overall composition. Maybe I would have tried a cropped version only with the green surface. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 21:05, 3 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I'm not really convinced of the 'wow' factor, sorry. I also find the colours a bit dull. TheBritinator (talk) 17:39, 4 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Lovely landscape, and the quality is OK. I don't see any reason for this not to be featured. --heylenny (talk/edits) 19:22, 5 April 2026 (UTC)
    •  Comment Maybe you should support for positive reasons, and not for non-negative reasons ? :)--Jebulon (talk) 20:57, 5 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Something strange (and blue) in the tree. And per Iekaterina.--Jebulon (talk) 21:00, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Apogónido (Ostorhinchus nigrofasciatus), mar Rojo, Egipto, 2023-04-18, DD 174.jpg

Voting period ends on 7 Apr 2026 at 20:05:38 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Blackstripe cardinalfish (Ostorhinchus nigrofasciatus), Red Sea, Egypt
  • @ArionStar: true, ✓ Fixed Poco a poco (talk) 06:29, 30 March 2026 (UTC)
     Support Poco's quality level now. ★ 21:18, 30 March 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --Yann (talk) 07:27, 30 March 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --Llez (talk) 08:21, 31 March 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Юрий Д.К. 10:32, 31 March 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support It has superb metallic colors. --JackyM59 (talk) 11:20, 1 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 04:03, 3 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Arenal (Parapercis millepunctata), Anilao, Filipinas, 2023-08-21, DD 97.jpg

Voting period ends on 7 Apr 2026 at 19:50:52 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Black dotted sand perch (Parapercis millepunctata), Anilao, Philippines
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Order_:_Trachiniformes
  •  Info Black dotted sand perch (Parapercis millepunctata), Anilao, Philippines. This species inhabits the coral reefs of the Indo-Pacific region. It exhibits a streamlined body that can reach up to 25 centimetres (9.8 in) in length and primarily feeds on small invertebrates and crustaceans. Despite their remarkable ability to blend in, they are not immune to predation. Larger fish, rays, and other carnivorous sea creatures consider these fish as a meal. Note: there are no FPs on Commons of this species. Poco a poco (talk) 19:50, 29 March 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 19:50, 29 March 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Interesting fish. chromatic aberration is pronounced in the left third. JayCubby (talk) 20:32, 29 March 2026 (UTC)
  • I wouldn't have called it "pronounced" but ok, I removed it Poco a poco (talk) 06:33, 30 March 2026 (UTC)
    Often I need to go further than 1:1 zoom to find CA to complain about, hence pronounced here. JayCubby (talk) 14:01, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

File:The Concourse of TAIYUANNANZHAN Station in Taiyuan 2025 (edited).jpg

Voting period ends on 7 Apr 2026 at 15:50:05 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#China
  •  Info created and firstly uploaded by Kmchang28 – edited and nominated by ★ -- ★ 15:50, 29 March 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Yes, it was taken with an iPhone 17 Pro, but it surprisingly is of good quality, and the composition is also good enough. -- ★ 15:50, 29 March 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Great photo! -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 23:14, 29 March 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 14:36, 30 March 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:52, 30 March 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 02:25, 31 March 2026 (UTC)
  •  Weak oppose I do appreciate seeing something different, as well as the fact that PC was performed before renominating! While this is a well-aligned, technically really not bad shot (especially considering this was taken with a smartphone!), there are two things that keep me from supporting this nomination: i) To me, the composition feels rather bottom-heavy, with quite some space at the bottom, but little at the top. ii) For my taste, this is  Underexposed (look at the yellow boxes on the right, or at the peoples' faces on the left). I have seen iPhone users intentionally taking underexposed photos for a more dramatic look (which can work, sometimes), but it is still too dark. --Aciarium ⚒ (talk) 06:54, 31 March 2026 (UTC)
    I think the photographer preserved part of the floor because there's nice reflections on it. About the  Underexposed: what I see is a kind of play of lights where there're contrasting areas that match the mood of the image. ★ 15:38, 31 March 2026 (UTC)
    @ArionStar: It's a matter of taste, I would say. However, I can understand why others like this image! --Aciarium ⚒ (talk) 10:01, 2 April 2026 (UTC)
    I am the original photographer, and I'm very happy to see that someone has noticed this photo. I also appreciate the adjustments made to it. Besides the limitations of smartphones, the  Underexposed is also due to the fact that many subway stations in China lower their lighting to save energy. Kmchang28 (talk) 02:31, 3 April 2026 (UTC)
    @Kmchang28: thank you for explaining for us and feel free to support as the creator! ★ 03:42, 3 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 19:26, 2 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Nice vanishing point. --heylenny (talk/edits) 19:24, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

File:Portale di San Giorgio 2025-10-30.jpg

Voting period ends on 6 Apr 2026 at 22:57:23 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Portale di San Giorgio, Ragusa, Sicily
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects/Architectural_elements#Doors
  •  Info: Gothic Portal of St. George, Ragusa, Sicily; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 22:57, 28 March 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 22:57, 28 March 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support though a slightly wider crop may be better if possible. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 05:19, 30 March 2026 (UTC)
    I agree; unfortunately, applying perspective correction ate a lot of room on the flanks... --The Cosmonaut (talk) 08:14, 30 March 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 14:37, 30 March 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --Llez (talk) 08:17, 31 March 2026 (UTC)
  • weak  Support The Portale di San Giorgio is an important example of the Sicilian variant of Gothic art, despite of the damages or even because of them because they are typical for Ragusa’s chequered history. The photo captures the portal nicely, although more room at the left and right would be even better. – Aristeas (talk) 10:17, 31 March 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Though I agree about the crop. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:55, 31 March 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:33, 1 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 19:24, 2 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Nice picture of a portal, nothing special too me tight crop both sides and below. I have read the other comments.--Jebulon (talk) 15:38, 5 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 19:23, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

File:2026-02 - Aerial view of puits Arthur-de-Buyer - 049.jpg

Voting period ends on 6 Apr 2026 at 22:01:28 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#France
  •  Info Aerial view of Arthur-de-Buyer coal mine ruins, the deepest mine shaft in France between 1900 and 1910. Disused since 1958, these ruins emerge from the forest, especially in winter. Created, uploaded and nominated by A.BourgeoisP
  •  Support -- A.BourgeoisP (talk) 22:01, 28 March 2026 (UTC)
  •  Comment I’m not really a fan of drone photos, mainly because of the technical quality, but I still wanted to comment on this one. Aside from that and the winter vegetation, which severely limits the composition, the lighting isn’t particularly good either. I took a look at the shooting location using Google Maps’ satellite view. I assume the camera was facing east? Perhaps you could add a bit more drama to the image by shooting this scene again early in the morning in a backlit situation in a few weeks. Maybe on a cold morning with ground fog and a little more spring vegetation, from a slightly lower vantage point—for example, at twice the height of the building. --Achim Lammerts • Syntaxys (talk) 06:32, 29 March 2026 (UTC)
  •  Oppose This is very similar to one of your previous nominations and it has the same issue of being very dull, sorry. Furthermore, I'm just generally not a fan of drone shots since they rarely capture exceptional quality, in my opinion. TheBritinator (talk) 23:56, 29 March 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support I agree that different weather and lighting would allow for very exciting shots of this place. But surprisingly, in my opinion, this image works very well as it is. The fact that the building remains barely stand out from the vegetation, but rather half disappear into it, is a feature here, as it emphasizes how nature absorbs and reclaims the remnants of human activity. The composition and perspective is also very good because it makes the facades appear staggered, like the scenery in a theatrical scene. Quality and resolution are more than apt. – Aristeas (talk) 18:14, 30 March 2026 (UTC)
  •  Weak oppose apologies but I have to agree with the others. Perhaps a different editing to bring out the contrast? --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 02:28, 31 March 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Юрий Д.К. 10:29, 31 March 2026 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Could this picture be featurable with better lighting conditions? Maybe so, but my feeling is that it is the very subject and composition which are not interesting enough. Alvesgaspar (talk) 18:39, 31 March 2026 (UTC)
  •  Weak oppose Leaning towards a contra. A compelling subject with evident potential, yet the current light leaves it curiously subdued. The scene remains without real tension. Under more decisive light - perhaps late afternoon or early evening - the same motif could gain the presence it currently only suggests. Sorry. -- Radomianin (talk) 22:44, 3 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Jérémy-Günther-Heinz Jähnick (talk) 13:29, 4 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 19:23, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

File:2020-08 - Thermes de Luxeuil-les-Bains - 01.jpg

Voting period ends on 6 Apr 2026 at 22:00:51 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Thermes de Luxeuil-les-Bains
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#France
  •  Info The thermal spa of Luxeuil-les-Bains was built in the 18th century using pink sandstone from the Vosges (very typical local stone). Created, uploaded and nominated by A.BourgeoisP
  •  Support -- A.BourgeoisP (talk) 22:00, 28 March 2026 (UTC)
  •  Comment Unfortunately, the lower part—specifically the foreground with the cars and street signs—ruins this otherwise beautiful architectural shot. If I were to choose a photo for the nomination, I rather would have gone with this one (of yours), though I would first remove the flower bed edging in the lower right corner and adjust the WB slightly more cooler like in this nominiation here. --Achim Lammerts • Syntaxys (talk) 05:54, 29 March 2026 (UTC)
    Thank you for your comments and advice; however, I prefer this one and have made some adjustments to improve upon the flaws. A.BourgeoisP (talk) 19:17, 30 March 2026 (UTC)
     Support Yes, this is much better, thanks for the improvements. Achim Lammerts • Syntaxys (talk) 04:24, 31 March 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Great shot, though I would try to remove the car and sign on the right if possible. TheBritinator (talk) 23:58, 29 March 2026 (UTC)
    ✓ Done, Thank you for your recommendation, it works much better now. A.BourgeoisP (talk) 19:17, 30 March 2026 (UTC)
    Good work. TheBritinator (talk) 22:42, 31 March 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 05:07, 30 March 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Better now. Of course the remaining car at the bottom left is a bit unfortunate, but we all know that cars and similar stuff are often unavoidable in public places, and all in all this is a very balanced, clean and beautiful view of this interesting and well-proportioned building. – Aristeas (talk) 19:46, 30 March 2026 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Not special enough to deserve the star, even without the car. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 04:24, 31 March 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support ★ 20:42, 2 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:48, 4 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support--ComputerHotline (talk) 13:46, 4 April 2026 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Agree with Alvesgaspar. That car and those people at the front door are distracting. Also, the quality is not that good. --heylenny (talk/edits) 19:26, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

File:ОУ „Христијан Тодоровски Карпош“ - Челопек 3.jpg

Voting period ends on 6 Apr 2026 at 17:59:40 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Social distancing floor signs installed during the COVID-19 pandemic leading to the entrance of Hristijan Todorovski Karpoš Primary School in the village of Čelopek
  •  Question Because most of us can't read Russian, could you please provide some information about the subject? -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 18:41, 31 March 2026 (UTC)
  • @Alvesgaspar: This is the entrance door of a primary school in a village whose building was built sometime in the 1930s. During the COVID-19 pandemic, feet marks were placed on the floor in front of the entrance as a social distancing measure. Additionally, there's an inscription that reads 'keep distance' (Macedonian: држи дистанца) next to the feet marks nearer to the door. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 22:01, 31 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Thanks for the explanation, and very sorry for my mistake about the language. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 22:22, 31 March 2026 (UTC)

File:First JATO assisted Flight - GPN-2000-001538.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Apr 2026 at 18:33:26 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

JATO test, 12 August 1941

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Apr 2026 at 16:06:14 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Different crosses at Clonmacnoise in Ireland

Alternative

  •  Info @Aciarium: , @Llez: , @Crisco 1492: , @Ermell: , @Kiril Simeonovski: . Cropped as suggested. --Berthold Werner (talk) 21:07, 28 March 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support FYI Berthold, you have to sign comments for pings to go through JayCubby (talk) 20:03, 28 March 2026 (UTC)
  •  Comment There is no tension here leading up to the ruin. In my opinion, the church and the cemetery belong together.--Ermell (talk) 20:32, 28 March 2026 (UTC)
    •  Comment At first I thought about cropping out the church too, but then I realised something would be missing. I think you’re right – it does take away some of the tension. I now prefer the top version as well. --Berthold Werner (talk) 15:18, 29 March 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 23:05, 28 March 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support I prefer this one. //shb (t • c) 01:25, 29 March 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support I also think this is the better crop; it works better with the composition. The light is beautifully captured. --Achim Lammerts • Syntaxys (talk) 05:10, 29 March 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 17:53, 29 March 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Юрий Д.К. 18:20, 29 March 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support @Berthold Werner: Thank you, I like this alternative even more than the one originally nominated. --Aciarium ⚒ (talk) 08:25, 30 March 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:05, 30 March 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support This one is good as well. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 14:39, 30 March 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:45, 30 March 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support This (the cropped) version is even better. – Aristeas (talk) 18:06, 30 March 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 07:30, 31 March 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --Yann (talk) 09:20, 31 March 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Moving my support here.  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:57, 31 March 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support -- Radomianin (talk) 23:12, 3 April 2026 (UTC)

Timetable (day 5 after nomination)

Tue 31 Mar → Sun 05 Apr
Wed 01 Apr → Mon 06 Apr
Thu 02 Apr → Tue 07 Apr
Fri 03 Apr → Wed 08 Apr
Sat 04 Apr → Thu 09 Apr
Sun 05 Apr → Fri 10 Apr

Timetable (day 9 after nomination, last day of voting)

Fri 27 Mar → Sun 05 Apr
Sat 28 Mar → Mon 06 Apr
Sun 29 Mar → Tue 07 Apr
Mon 30 Mar → Wed 08 Apr
Tue 31 Mar → Thu 09 Apr
Wed 01 Apr → Fri 10 Apr
Thu 02 Apr → Sat 11 Apr
Fri 03 Apr → Sun 12 Apr
Sat 04 Apr → Mon 13 Apr
Sun 05 Apr → Tue 14 Apr

Closing nominations manually

The following description explains how to close nominations manually. Normally this is not necessary, as FPCBot takes care of counting the votes, closing and archiving the nominations. When the Bot has counted the votes, a user needs to check and approve the result; everything else is done by the Bot. Therefore, the following instructions are normally only needed for delist-and-replace nominations that the Bot cannot (yet) process, and in case the Bot malfunctions. The closing can be done by any experienced user. If you need help, just ask on the FPC talk page.

  1. On Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the nomination, then [edit].
    • Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line):
      {{FPC-results-reviewed|support=x|oppose=x|neutral=x|featured=(“yes” or “no”)|gallery=xxx|sig=~~~~}}
      (You can leave the gallery parameter blank if the image was not featured. If the nomination contains alternatives, you must add the alternative=xxx parameter with the name of the selected image between the gallery and the sig parameter. See {{FPC-results-reviewed}} for examples and more explanations.)
    • Edit the title of the nomination and add featured or not featured after the link – for example:
      === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
      becomes
      === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], featured ===
    • Save your edit.
  2. If it is featured:
    1. Add the picture to the list of the four most recently featured pictures of an appropriate gallery of Commons:Featured pictures, list as the first one and delete the last one, so that the number is four again.
    2. Add the picture to the appropriate featured picture gallery page and section. Click on the most appropriate link beneath where you just added it as one of the four images on Commons:Featured pictures, list to find the gallery page, and search for the correct section. (An image should only appear ONE time in the galleries. After a successful nomination, the image can be placed in several of the Featured pictures categories.)
    3. Add the template {{Assessments|featured=1}} to the image description page.
      • If it was an alternative image or part of a set nomination, use the com-nom parameter. For example, if File:Foo.jpg was promoted in the nomination Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bar.jpg, use {{Assessments|featured=1|com-nom=Bar.jpg}} You also need the com-nom parameter if the image gets renamed.
      • If the image is already featured on another Wikipedia, just add featured=1 to the {{Assessments}} template. For instance, {{Assessments|enwiki=1}} becomes {{Assessments|enwiki=1|featured=1}}
    4. Head over to the structured data for the image and add the “Commons quality assessment” claim (P6731) “Wikimedia Commons featured picture” (Q63348049).
    5. Add the picture to the chronological archives of featured pictures. Place it at the end of the gallery using this format:
      File:xxxxx.jpg|# '''Title'''<br>created by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], uploaded by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]<br> {{s|xxx}}, {{o|xxx}}, {{n|xxx}}
      • The # should be replaced by 1 for the first image nominated that month, and counts up after that. Have a look at the other entries on that page for examples. (If you want to do everything perfectly, link that number to the nomination subpage, just like FPCBot does this. It allows users to jump directly to the nomination.)
      • The Title should be replaced by the bare name of the featured picture, without the ‘File:’ or the file extension (such as .jpg .tif .svg).
      • The x in {{s|x}}, {{o|x}}, {{n|x}} should be replaced by the count of support, oppose, and neutral votes respectively.
      • If the nomination was a set nomination, use this format:
        File:xxxxx.jpg|# '''Set: Title (Z files)'''<br>created by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], uploaded by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]<br> {{s|x}}, {{o|x}}, {{n|x}}
        Replace the Z in (Z files) by the count of images in the set, and use the name of the first image from the set instead of File:xxxxx.jpg and for the title.
    6. Add == FP promotion ==
      {{FPpromotion|File:XXXXX.jpg}} to the talk page of the nominator. For set nominations, use:
      == Set Promoted to FP ==
      <gallery>
      File:XXXXXX.jpg
      File:XXXXXX.jpg
      </gallery>
      {{FPpromotionSet2|YYYYY}}      , using the names of the set files instead of the XXXXXX and the title of the set instead of YYYYY.
    7. Add == FP promotion ==
      {{FPpromotedUploader|File:XXXXX.jpg}} to the talk page of the user who has uploaded the image, if that user is not the same as the nominator.
    8. Add == FP promotion ==
      {{FPpromotedCreator|File:XXXXX.jpg}} to the talk page of the creator, if the author is a different Commons user than nominator and uploader.
  3. Add candidate archive categories to the nomination so that people can easily find and evaluate past nominations (this applies also to unsuccessful, {{FPX}}-d, {{FPD}}-d and {{Withdraw}}-n nominations). It’s best practice to wrap all these categories in a <noinclude>...</noinclude> section because they apply only to the nomination itself, not to the log page etc. which transclude it. You need three or four categories:
    1. A category for the month and year, like Category:April 2026 featured picture candidates for the current month.
    2. A category for the type and result of the nomination, like Category:2026 successful candidates for featured picture status; replace “successful” by “unsuccessful”, “FPXed”, “FPDed” or “withdrawn”, depending on the final result of the nomination (see the supercategory for common values).
    3. A category for the subject of the nomination, like Category:2026 featured picture candidates of plants. Replace “plants” by one of the possible subject keywords like “animals”, “architecture”, etc.; see the base category for all common keywords. Basically the subject keywords correspond to the first part of the gallery link.
    4. If the nomination is a set nomination, add Category:2026 featured picture set nominations.
  4. As the last step (whether the image is featured or not; including {{FPX}}-d, {{FPD}}-d and {{Withdraw}}-n nominations), you have to move the transclusion (the {{ }} and the text within those) of the nomination to the current log page.
    • To find the current log page, visit the first page of the log for this month. If the header of that page contains a link with the text “Next part of this month”, the log for this month has been split into several parts because it contains too many entries. Click on the “Next part …” link and repeat this until you reach a page where the header does not offer a “Next part …” link; that’s the last and current log page.
    • Now open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination you are closing. It will be of the form: {{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}} or: {{Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/XXXXX}}.
    • Copy that line to the bottom of the current log page and save that page. Then remove the same line from the candidate list and save that page.

Closing a delisting nomination

  1. On Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
    Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line):
    {{FPC-delist-results-reviewed|delist=x|keep=x|neutral=x|delisted=yes/no|sig=~~~~}}
    (for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/File:Ensifera ensifera (22271195865).jpg)
  2. Edit the title of the delisting nomination and add delisted or not delisted after the image title; for example:
    === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
    becomes
    === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], delisted ===
  3. Add candidate archive categories to the nomination; this works the same way as described above for featured picture nominations. The only difference is that the category for type and status must be of the form Category:2026 successful candidates for delisting from featured picture status, or Category:2026 successful candidates for delisting and replacing featured pictures if this is a delist-and-replace nomination. Substitute “unsuccessful”, “FPXed”, “FPDed” or “withdrawn” for “successful”, depending on the final result of the nomination.
  4. Move the transclusion of the nomination to the current log page; please see above for an explanation how to find the current log page and how to move the nomination to it.
  5. If the outcome was not delisted, stop here. If it is delisted:
    1. Remove the picture from Commons:Featured pictures, list and any subpages.
    2. Edit the picture's description as follows:
    3. Add a delisting-comment to the original entry in the chronological archive of featured pictures in bold-face, e. g. delisted 2007-07-19 (1–6) with (1–6) meaning 1 keep and 6 delist votes (change as appropriate). The picture must not be removed from the chronological archives.
  6. If this is a Delist and Replace, the delisting and promotion must both be done manually. To do the promotion, follow the steps in the section above. Note that the assessment tag on the file page and the promotion tag on the nominator's talk page won't pick up the /replace subpage that these nominations use.

Archiving a withdrawn nomination

If a nomination has been withdrawn by the nominator by using {{Withdraw}} or is cancelled with {{FPX}} or {{FPD}}, wait 24 hours after the nomination was last edited. If there has been no objection to the cancellation within this time, the nomination can simply be archived. Just add candidate archive categories to the nomination itself, then move the transclusion of the nomination to the current log page; please see above for an explanation how to find the current log page and how to move the nomination to it.

Category:Featured pictures#%20 Category:Commons projects-en#Pictures,%20Pictures%20candidates,%20Featured