Commons:特色靚相候選

Shortcut: COM:FPC Alemannisch | asturianu | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | English | فارسی | español | suomi | français | galego | हिन्दी | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | молдовеняскэ | norsk bokmål | português | polski | română | русский | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | українська | Tiếng Việt | 粵語 | 中文（中国大陆） | 中文（简体） | 中文（繁體） | հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia |+/−

呢度係成為特色靚相嘅候選區。請留意呢度唔係同每日靚相一樣。

要知道之前有乜提名，睇睇：Commons:等色靚相/紀錄

正式嘅事物

提名

如果您認為您已經創作或搵到一張可能有價值的圖片，請將佢加到「提名」部分嘅最頂部。用呢個連結加入。

喺您提名之前，請肯定已經喺相應的圖片加上適當嘅版權標籤。

請喺投票嘅時候利用您嘅語言或者使用下面嘅模板：

  • 支持 - Support, Yes, Sim, Ja, Oui, Sí, Kyllä, ...
  • 反對 - Oppose, No, Não, Nein, Non, Ei, ...

另外，您亦可以使用模板{{Oppose}}同{{Support}}

您亦可以表達使用{{I love}}代表您喜歡呢張圖片或您想利用{{Neutral}}嚟表達您嘅睇法。

特色靚相候選方針

  • 14 日投票持間。結果將會喺提名後嘅第 15 日公佈決定。
  • 歡迎匿名貢獻者嘅提名
  • 歡迎匿名貢獻者嘅討論貢獻
  • 匿名貢獻者嘅投票不作計算
  • 提名者不會計作票數。必須另作解釋作出支持。
  • 記住，Wikimedia Commons 計劃嘅目標係提供一個中央式嘅檔案庫，以提供所有 Wikimedia 計劃(包括未來的計劃)裏使用。呢個唔只係於置 Wikipedia 嘅圖片，因此呢啲圖片唔係只針對嗰個計劃作出決定。

要成功登上特色靚相，必須合乎以下嘅條件。

  • 合理嘅牌照 (當然)
  • 最少 5 張支持票
  • 支持／反對嘅比例最少為 2:1 (三分二多數，即最少 67% 支持)

有關點樣處理舊嘅提名，睇睇Template talk:Featured pictures candidates#What to do after voting is finished。

更新呢一頁：purge this page's cache

提名

File:Brest Fortress Church of Saint Nicholas 2023-04-23 3554.jpg

Voting period ends on 7 Jun 2026 at 14:43:06 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Fortress church of Saint Nicholas in the Brest Fortress, Brest

File:Узор на потолке мечети Баланд 6.jpg

Voting period ends on 7 Jun 2026 at 08:53:03 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Baland Mosque ceiling pattern. Bukhara, Uzbekistan

File:Luxor is a city - Mohamed abdelzaher (2).jpg

Voting period ends on 6 Jun 2026 at 21:55:56 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:175 Male Damara-Dikdik in Etosha National Park Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg

Voting period ends on 6 Jun 2026 at 21:02:29 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Male Damara-Dikdik in Etosha National Park

File:087 Rosy-faced lovebird couple cuddling in Damaraland Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg

Voting period ends on 6 Jun 2026 at 20:54:51 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Rosy-faced lovebird couple cuddling in Damaraland

File:Iglesia de San Severin, París, Francia, 2022-10-29, DD 102-104 HDR.jpg

Voting period ends on 6 Jun 2026 at 20:39:01 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Church of Saint Severin, Paris, France

File:Micromys minutus - British Wildlife Centre.jpg

Voting period ends on 6 Jun 2026 at 15:42:14 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Harvest mouse on teasel
  •  Support --Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 19:19, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 02:39, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 06:46, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:55, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Ermell (talk) 07:31, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support —Bruce1eetalk 09:32, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Weak support Cute and excellent composition. Would be even better if the photographer had avoided to apply such strong sharpening to the sharp areas and such strong denoising/smudging to the unsharp areas; that combination makes it look somewhat overprocessed. - Aristeas (talk) 13:30, 29 May 2026 (UTC)

File:Charançon rouge des palmiers (Rhynchophorus ferrugineus).jpg

Voting period ends on 6 Jun 2026 at 14:51:43 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Bonsoir, merci beaucoup SAIDI Ismail (talk) 20:25, 28 May 2026 (UTC)

File:Freiburg Münster linkes Seitenschiff Schmiedefenster 01.jpg

Voting period ends on 6 Jun 2026 at 12:07:36 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Smiths' Window in Freiburg Minster
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural_elements#Single_stained_glass_windows
  •  Info Smiths' Window in the north aisle of the nave of Freiburg Minster, Freiburg im Breisgau, Baden-Württemberg, Germany. Anonymous master, around 1320. All by me.
  •  Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 12:07, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Comment - Horizontal perspective seems skewed. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:59, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support - Still slightly skewed at the top, but I think this meets the FP criteria. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:01, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --Yann (talk) 16:13, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --Wilfredor (talk) 17:32, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Neutral Contrast is too harsh for me, but that is mainly personal preference. Cmao20 (talk) 17:42, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:51, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Weak support Like Cmao20 I think photographs of stained-glass windows are even better when they show also the surroundings (and not just black); but this one is so well done that it deserves support. – Aristeas (talk) 13:27, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 15:01, 29 May 2026 (UTC)

File:Stelpboerderij Beslingadijk 15 Friens. 23-03-2026. (actm.) 01.jpg

Voting period ends on 6 Jun 2026 at 05:05:27 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Erithacus rubecula mating 628463896.jpg

Voting period ends on 5 Jun 2026 at 23:17:44 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Mating European robins
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes/Muscicapidae#Genus_:_Erithacus
  •  Info Ten current FPs but this is the first image of their mating on commons. Created by Interaccoonale – uploaded by Interaccoonale – nominated by Interaccoonale -- ––Interaccoonale (talk) 23:17, 27 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support This is a high-quality capture of European robins mating. I selected this frame as the main nomination because it offers the best side-profile composition and educational value. However, this is part of a serial shoot. I have other frames from the same sequence available if the community wishes to see or consider an "Alternative." -- ––Interaccoonale (talk) 23:17, 27 May 2026 (UTC)
    Note: this image was uploaded to this site through iNaturalist2Commons and subsequently updated from my local disk. I've added a link to my user page on my iNaturalist profile to prove the copyright ownership. ––Interaccoonale (talk) 23:25, 27 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Neutral Very beautifull moment, but IMHO heavy JPEG compression (try export it in full quality) and out of focus the top bird. I will change my vote if the JPEG is exported in better quality --Wilfredor (talk) 00:31, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
    The compression level is 95. It is not a compression. I think what you're talking about is the side effects of denoising. ––Interaccoonale (talk) 07:11, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
    You are absolutely right Wilfredor (talk) 13:36, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Oppose very good image but unfortunately the cropping of the wing at the top kills it for me. Sorry. --Espandero (talk) 06:34, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
  • Yes I also worried about it when choosing this file. I personally preferred this one because I thought its wing was full of movement, being very energetic. I am proposing an alternative showing the whole birds and both of them are more in focus.––Interaccoonale (talk) 06:58, 28 May 2026 (UTC)

Alternative

 Comment: This is an alternative as suggested by Wilfredor and Espandero, ensuring that both birds are completely in the frame and are both in focus.––Interaccoonale (talk) 06:59, 28 May 2026 (UTC)

  •  Comment This is a nice moment captured well, but the image could benefit from some processing to clarify/brighten things up. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:31, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  alt 2 Exccelent now and ok to me, thanks for upload this version --Wilfredor (talk) 13:34, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:51, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 02:43, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --Espandero (talk) 06:08, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --Ermell (talk) 07:33, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support for the alternative. – Aristeas (talk) 13:21, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --Yann (talk) 14:43, 29 May 2026 (UTC)

File:Црква „Св. Ѓорѓи“ - Турново.jpg

Voting period ends on 5 Jun 2026 at 23:04:48 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The southern side of St. George Church in the village of Turnovo
  • I wish it was sharper but still  Support Cmao20 (talk) 17:40, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
  • Thank you for noting the (un)sharpness. I've uploaded a sharper version. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 20:10, 28 May 2026 (UTC)

File:Travessa Couto Fernandes 60 Centro São Luís 2025-6016.jpg

Voting period ends on 5 Jun 2026 at 21:36:00 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:2013-10-31 01 (L-R) STAR CLIPPER - IMO 8915445, ROYAL CLIPPER - IMO 8712178 - Motril, Spain.jpg

Voting period ends on 5 Jun 2026 at 18:31:27 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Barquentine meets square-rigged saliing ship off the Spanish Coast.

File:Церковь Спаса Преображения утром.jpg

Voting period ends on 5 Jun 2026 at 10:21:20 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Church of the Transfiguration, Zherdevo, Tula Oblast, Russia

File:Petite Venise depuis le pont de la rue Turenne (Colmar) (1).jpg

Voting period ends on 5 Jun 2026 at 07:18:41 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Little Venice as seen from the Turenne Street bridge in Colmar (Haut-Rhin, France).

Alternative

 Comment: This is an alternative more cut off on the sides. Gzen92 (talk) 10:22, 28 May 2026 (UTC)

  •  Oppose Quality is OK, but the whole place is in shadow, and top and bottom crops are too short. Yann (talk) 12:51, 28 May 2026 (UTC)

File:Red-knobbed Coot Sidi Boughaba Nov25 A7CR 09076.jpg

Voting period ends on 5 Jun 2026 at 06:14:59 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Red-knobbed coot (Fulica cristata) in Lake Sidi Boughaba, Kenitra Province, Morocco
  • @Aristeas: Thanks for your review. Per your suggestion, I tried ccw rotation by 1 and 2 degrees, but the ripples on the water appear slightly tilted. The original looks more natural to me. --Tagooty (talk) 15:10, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
    • OK, so keep it as it is. Thank you for trying it! – Aristeas (talk) 15:52, 29 May 2026 (UTC)

File:Southern boubou – Dzierzyk rdzawobrzuchy – Laniarius ferrugineus.jpg

Voting period ends on 4 Jun 2026 at 21:49:56 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Southern boubou – female

File:Carly Pearce performing at Hogs for Hospice, Leamington, Ontario, 2025-08-01 53.jpg

Voting period ends on 4 Jun 2026 at 19:22:45 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Iglesia de San Agustín, París, Francia, 2022-10-31, DD 93-95 HDR.jpg

Voting period ends on 4 Jun 2026 at 17:44:27 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Church of Saint Augustin, Paris, France
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Paris
  •  Info Church of Saint Augustin, Paris, France. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 17:44, 26 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 17:44, 26 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Excellent play with the unavoidable distorsion. Very good, and I know the place ! --Jebulon (talk) 19:21, 26 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Weak oppose composition is not ideal for FP distracting foreground elements, awkward chandelier crop, and very strong wide-angle distortion reduce the overall visual balance. Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 21:47, 26 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Weak oppose Per Olfa Yakoubi --Tagooty (talk) 06:18, 27 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support very good wide angle view in high quality.--Ermell (talk) 06:28, 27 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support crop chairs in bottom, to start bellow first step, so chairs wont disturb and view is more clear. --Mile (talk) 07:19, 27 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support IMO opposing this for the perspective distortion is somewhat close-minded, sorry to say. Not every picture needs to be perspective-corrected to death. This picture instead chooses to highlight the perspective distortion as a feature to illustrate the imposing scale of the building, which is an entirely valid approach. Cmao20 (talk) 12:23, 27 May 2026 (UTC)
  • Thank you for your assessment, Cmao20, but I think the motivation for the vote is not based on the picture itselft. I just realised that when I went through all current FP candidates yesterday morning I opposed the 2 noms of Olfa Yakoubi because none of them convinced me in terms of level of detail. The first edit he/she did afterwards was coming here to oppose this candidate (and second oppose in his FP record, what are the odds?). Definitely unfair but nothing unusual. Poco a poco (talk) 14:40, 27 May 2026 (UTC)
    Se que no podemos prevenir esto, pero al menos conmigo, votame todo lo negativo que puedas, nunca hare eso. Aunque a veces pudiera estar equivocado intento ser lo mas objetivo posible Wilfredor (talk) 14:56, 27 May 2026 (UTC)
    I’m really disappointed and honestly hurt by your comment, Diego. Reading that my vote could be interpreted as revenge or retaliation was painful for me, because that is not how I participate in FP discussions at all.
    I can’t imagine that you would think my oppose is related to the fact that you opposed some pictures I nominated — especially since this not even mine photo. I always try to give my opinion based on the image itself and according to my understanding of FP criteria, even when my opinion may differ from others.
    I still don’t like the composition of this photo. In my opinion, the framing is not ideal, the foreground elements are distracting, and the brightness and distortion affect the overall visual balance. That is why I opposed it, and I still stand by my opinion sincerely and in good faith.
    What hurt me the most is the implication that my opinion was dishonest or motivated by personal feelings. I respect your work and your contributions a lot. In fact, I have supported some of your photos before, and there are also photos of yours that I personally don’t like but chose not to oppose because I respect different artistic views and standards.
    By the way, we already met before — I don’t know if you remember — and I genuinely appreciate your photography overall. That is also why this statement was painful for me to read. Even when we disagree on a nomination, I believe we should assume good faith and respect each other’s opinions.
    And honestly, after reading your comment, I no longer feel comfortable voting on your photos in the future if my opinions are going to be interpreted this way instead of being seen as sincere photographic criticism.
    For this specific picture, I simply do not think it reaches FP level, and my vote was made honestly, sincerely, and without any personal intention. Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 17:46, 27 May 2026 (UTC)
    I think that what Diego commented is not what he meant, remember that his level of English is not very good and he could use very direct or incorrect words, there is also the cultural difference. Wilfredor (talk) 19:38, 27 May 2026 (UTC)
  • Please Wilfredor, don't talk for me about what I meant or not. I don't think either, that you are the most appropiate person to judge my level of English. I meant what I wrote, because although I don't know Olfa Yokoubi, I've often seen this behavior very often in the almost last 20 years. That's why I wonder about the odds that the first edit after my 2 opposes is right away a decline here. Olfa, you will have to recognize that if my opposes didn't play a role in your oppose it looks at least suspicious. Still I'm happy to read that you confirm otherwise. Poco a poco (talk) 13:03, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
  • Your English is absolutely fine, Poco. Best to leave this whole nonsensical discussion. Cmao20 (talk) 13:28, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
You're right, Poco poco; it wasn't my place to interpret what you meant or judge your English. I'm sorry, it was a mistake on my part. I'll leave Wilfredor (talk) 14:45, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
I agree, Cmao20, let's move on Poco a poco (talk) 20:09, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support The way the chairs are cut off at the bottom is a bit annoying; I would have cut it at the level of the stairs, but that's more of a personal decision than a technically valid one. The chandelier also obstructs the view of the dome, but I understand it's a necessary sacrifice since it's not something that can be removed. Thank you for this nomination. I have a similar one from another church, and I had my doubts about whether this type of composition would be accepted, but I agree that not all wide-angle distortion needs to be corrected, especially if the result would create a completely disproportionate image. --Wilfredor (talk) 14:17, 27 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Юрий Д.К. 09:53, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:49, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 13:13, 29 May 2026 (UTC)

File:Lunch atop a Skyscraper - Charles Clyde Ebbets.jpg

Voting period ends on 4 Jun 2026 at 16:46:07 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Lunch atop a Skyscraper, distributed by Acme Newspictures, September 1932.

File:Allegorie dèdiè au tiers etat LCCN2004676887-restored.jpg

Voting period ends on 3 Jun 2026 at 18:53:46 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Engraving from the time of the French Revolution (specifically from the period of the National Constituent Assembly, around 1789) entitled "Allegory Dedicated to the Third Estate."
File:Allegorie dèdiè au tiers etat LCCN2004676887.tif this is the source file to do restoration, I downloaded it in the webpage given in the description of jpg file --Ezarateesteban 11:57, 26 May 2026 (UTC)
If that's your source, it confirms my suspicions. I'd like to know why the restored version is larger—not the overall image size, because it was cropped, but the designs within it. Wilfredor (talk) 12:45, 26 May 2026 (UTC)
I use only GIMP without resize anything --Ezarateesteban 12:49, 26 May 2026 (UTC)
Cambiare mi voto a favor si corriges lo del tamano, no tiene mucho sentido que sea mas grande que la original, quizas algun error al guardar?. Abrazos Wilfredor (talk) 19:51, 27 May 2026 (UTC)
Fijate ahora Wilfredor, sinceramente no se --Ezarateesteban 23:00, 27 May 2026 (UTC)
Esta foto merece ser FP, intenta ver que pudo haber pasado, quizas usaste otra fuente? Wilfredor (talk) 22:49, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support very interesting and very good restaoration.--Jebulon (talk) 19:34, 26 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Comment Like your other nomination, I would lighten the background. Yann (talk) 16:19, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
✓ Done tone curves improved --Ezarateesteban 22:37, 28 May 2026 (UTC)

File:Haetalmun Gate of Dopiansa Temple.jpg

Voting period ends on 4 Jun 2026 at 11:06:18 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Haetalmun Gate of Dopiansa Temple

File:Black-winged Cuckooshrike in Sundarbans National Park October 2025 by Tisha Mukherjee 02.jpg

Voting period ends on 4 Jun 2026 at 04:33:59 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Black-winged Cuckooshrike (Lalage melaschistos)

File:Yellow cultivar of Hibiscus rosa-sinensis.jpg

Voting period ends on 31 May 2026 at 05:25:22 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Yellow cultivar of Hibiscus rosa-sinensis
  •  Support R1F4T (talk) 02:32, 26 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Question Was this flower pasted onto the background? It looks weird. Krigore (talk) 11:39, 26 May 2026 (UTC)
    @Krigore No this flower is not pasted onto the background but I have increased background blur here is the real image Saadtitan12 (talk) 12:15, 26 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Neutral The original image was very noisy. The author tried to fix it by blurring the background, but the flower still has a lot of noise while the background doesn't, creating a sense of image manipulation, as already mentioned. I don't think applying noise reduction to the flower will correct this problem due to the high ISO used for an APS-C camera. --Wilfredor (talk) 14:29, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Wilfredor. This is just too unnatural. TheBritinator (talk) 14:35, 26 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Too much noise. --Berthold Werner (talk) 14:54, 26 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Good attempt but unfortunately agree with Wilfredor. Don't give up. Stay awhile and judge other QI/VI/FP noms. Your next FP nomination will be better. --GRDN711 (talk) 04:44, 28 May 2026 (UTC)

File:Argiope lobata - 08-2025.jpg

Voting period ends on 3 Jun 2026 at 18:32:37 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Common redshank (Tringa totanus) breeding Marken.jpg

Voting period ends on 3 Jun 2026 at 17:09:42 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Common redshank (Tringa totanus)
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes#Genus : Tringa
  •  Info Two current FPs, one and two. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:09, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:09, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Question Technically excellent, but I was recently told that FPC should be « the Best of Commons ». Should we have three « Best of Commons » pictures of the same bird ? --Jebulon (talk) 19:07, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
    We do have a delist procedure, but not sure that is appropriate here. Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:35, 26 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Krigore (talk) 11:32, 26 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Comment As they are different, I would keep 02 and this one; delist 01. --GRDN711 (talk) 05:50, 27 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Юрий Д.К. 09:51, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support No point punishing this picture because worse FPs exist of the same species Cmao20 (talk) 13:23, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support per Cmao20. “Best of Commons” does not mean “the best photos of each subject” – for that we have got VI –, it means “the best images on Commons”. If we have 10 great and wonderful photos of species A and only 1 mediocre photo of species B, we can feature all 10 great photos of species A, if they are really great and are sufficiently different (showing different aspects/perspectives/poses/subspecies/… of species A), but must not feature the mediocre photo of species B; the latter should become a VI for species B, of course. – Aristeas (talk) 10:14, 29 May 2026 (UTC)

File:Northern lapwing (Vanellus vanellus) female display Marken.jpg

Voting period ends on 3 Jun 2026 at 17:16:56 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Northern lapwing (Vanellus vanellus) female
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes#Genus : Vanellus
  •  Info Female displaying. (Here is normal posture) One current FP. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:16, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:16, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Question Same as nomination above… --Jebulon (talk) 19:11, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support - Different behaviour, meaning it illustrates a different aspect of the subject. "Best on Commons" doesn't necessarily mean best for the species; male and female birds, for example, are often different enough that separate images are necessary. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 02:48, 26 May 2026 (UTC)
    Thank you for answering. Of course I know that male and female animals are different ! In this case, separate images are necessary. Special behaviours (flying, mating, eating, etc…) could also justify a FP Candidacy. But… Oh well, I am sure you understand what I mean. Jebulon (talk) 09:42, 26 May 2026 (UTC)
    Of course. As I understand it, FPs need to be sufficiently distinctive to qualify, which I think is the case here. (Not sure on the other nomination).  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 17:39, 26 May 2026 (UTC)
    I would only add that if we have very high-quality photos of the same species or genus, new candidates on that type of subject are generally expected to meet a similar standard. It is not the same for a photo of a chess game, of which there are only two, as it is for hundreds of photos of churches. Even if they are different churches, they end up making this niche more demanding. Wilfredor (talk) 02:42, 27 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 04:22, 26 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Krigore (talk) 11:34, 26 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Striking posture and colours. Markedly different from the existing FP of the species. --Tagooty (talk) 09:09, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support per Tagooty. Yann (talk) 12:54, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Great photo Cmao20 (talk) 13:23, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 14:56, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support per Tagooty. – Aristeas (talk) 10:11, 29 May 2026 (UTC)

File:Le géranium odorant (ou Pelargonium).jpg

Voting period ends on 3 Jun 2026 at 14:53:33 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Wied il-Għasri 2025-05-05 (1).jpg

Voting period ends on 3 Jun 2026 at 06:24:04 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Wied il-Għasri

File:Mirador de la Fortaleza 2023-12-27.jpg

Voting period ends on 3 Jun 2026 at 06:23:58 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Mirador de la Fortaleza

File:Small Minivet in Saswad August 2025 by Tisha Mukherjee 01.jpg

Voting period ends on 3 Jun 2026 at 05:02:44 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Small Minivet (Pericrocotus cinnamomeus)
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Campephagidae_(Cuckooshrikes_and_allies)
  •  Info All by -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 05:02, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 05:02, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 02:56, 26 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Krigore (talk) 11:46, 26 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Weak oppose Good composition, but detail below the bar for such perched birds. --Tagooty (talk) 06:38, 27 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Not very sharp compared to the standard for this type of bird photography in FPC, image heavily cropped or downsized compared to the size that the sensor delivers. --Wilfredor (talk) 14:10, 27 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Looks fine to me, and yes of course it is cropped, most wildlife photographs are...Cmao20 (talk) 13:20, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support The orange of the breast contrasts very pleasingly with the green background LetmeEditit (talk) 16:29, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Excellent composition and colour contrast. Feather details appear a bit soft, but I guess we are spoiled a bit by the heavy AI sharpening many wildlife photographs use today and Tisha just did not apply such strong sharpening. So in the end the photo is possibly not softer, just less processed than other candidates. – Aristeas (talk) 19:59, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:48, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 06:41, 29 May 2026 (UTC)

File:Bombus impatiens on Zinnia elegans at Jardin botanique Roger-Van den Hende.jpg

Voting period ends on 3 Jun 2026 at 01:17:57 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:DSC08927-2 Beach, Forest, and Sky at Plaża Białogóra, Poland, 2025-09.jpg

Voting period ends on 2 Jun 2026 at 18:41:48 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A somewhat geometric shot of Białogóra Beach in Poland, showing three stacked visual elements: beach, forest, and sky.
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Poland#Kuyavian-Pomeranian
  •  Info A somewhat geometric shot of Białogóra Beach in Poland, showing three stacked visual elements: beach, forest, and sky. All by me. --Aciarium ⚒ (talk) 18:41, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support -- Aciarium ⚒ (talk) 18:41, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Weak oppose Excellent quality but I miss tension in this composition. Even the sky is very featureless. All the strong lines in the composition are horizontal, which means that the eye does not move through the frame in a satisfying manner. Cmao20 (talk) 19:21, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Good quality but not really anything going on here. TheBritinator (talk) 14:39, 26 May 2026 (UTC)

Memorial Stones for the Citizens of Łódź, Poland

Voting period ends on 2 Jun 2026 at 17:43:33 (UTC)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page

  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Monuments_and_memorials
  •  Info Ulica Piotrkowska in Łódź (Poland) is paved with 16,890 personalized stones, each carrying the name of one of the city's inhabitants. The project was started in 2000 on the occasion of the turn of the millennium, and has since been expanded twice. The aim of this set is to illustrate the commemorative stones and their cast iron plaques both in detail and as repeated elements arranged in rows forming the surface of the street. All by me. --Aciarium ⚒ (talk) 17:43, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support -- Aciarium ⚒ (talk) 17:43, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Strong and consistent visual approach throughout the set. The selective focus works here as part of the memorial narrative rather than a technical limitation. Having visited Piotrkowska myself, I find the images particularly effective in conveying the reflective atmosphere of the site - the fading names and repetitive structure reinforce the sense of memory and quiet absence remarkably well. -- Radomianin (talk) 18:45, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support I like this very much but  Comment I don’t understand the idea of a set. each is featurable IMO. in my humble opinion you should nominate one after the other…--Jebulon (talk) 19:23, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
    @Jebulon: Thank you, I actually wanted to nominate the images separately in the first place. However, I think a set nomination is suitable here, because both pictures show different aspects of the same subject, which I think is very helpful in explaining the artwork. The pavement, photographed at a "macroscopic" scale, visualizes the sheer amount of stones that it consists of. The other image shows how such a commemorative stone and its plaque look in detail. IMO, this also corresponds to what you might experience when you visit the location for the first time: at the first glance, you see that the pavement is made up of uncountable individualized stones; then you bow down and look at the single stones up close, reading the names inscribed in them -- at least this is what I did! :) --Aciarium ⚒ (talk) 23:56, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
    @Aciarium: : Thanks for answering. I understand you explanation. Jebulon (talk) 00:28, 26 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 05:18, 26 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I'm sorr, but this is definitely not a valid set. I would support the right candidate if nominated separately. Poco a poco (talk) 08:56, 26 May 2026 (UTC)
    « Definitely » ? Wow… Jebulon (talk) 09:45, 26 May 2026 (UTC)
    Why not? LetmeEditit (talk) 16:31, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support - I saw them some time ago and tried to take some photos, but yours are far better. Krigore (talk) 11:50, 26 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Comment Unsure about the set – our set rules are quite narrow. Of course I would support each of them if nominated separately. – Aristeas (talk) 19:55, 28 May 2026 (UTC)

Démolition des cheminées de la Raffinerie de Collombey

Voting period ends on 2 Jun 2026 at 16:40:20 (UTC)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page

  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Industry#Switzerland
  •  Info The Collombey refinery was in operation from 1963 to 2015. Its demolition started in 2021. The controlled explosion of its two chimneys on May 21st 2026 marked the end of the site's demolition, and also the disappearance of a landmark of the industrial landscape of the Rhône valley in Valais, Switzerland. This set documents the successive phases of the fall of both chimneys, photographed from a fixed viewpoint. For this set I selected 9 of the 11 images I uploaded to Commons, keeping the most distinct phases of the sequence; the full series is available in the dedicated category. All by Christian David -- Espandero (talk) 16:40, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support -- Espandero (talk) 16:40, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Question What about a video ?--Jebulon (talk) 17:40, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
    I've never done videos with my camera and I couldn't see myself improvising for a thing where I've only got one opportunity to do. I also think the photo format works well. -Espandero (talk) 18:27, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Very impressive. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 03:27, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 06:27, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support--Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 10:03, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --Ermell (talk) 21:05, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 05:18, 26 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support TheBritinator (talk) 14:42, 26 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Extraordinary sequence of a historic moment. The background is also good. --Tagooty (talk) 06:43, 27 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 14:39, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Each image is good enough to be a featured picture on its own, but they work even better as a set LetmeEditit (talk) 16:36, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Very impressive. – Aristeas (talk) 19:47, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:39, 28 May 2026 (UTC)

File:Side view of the Château de Chantilly with water reflection and blue sky Oise France.jpg

Voting period ends on 2 Jun 2026 at 14:33:34 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Château de Chantilly
  • I do not consider this a problem. Slate tiles in bright, direct sunlight will actually look like this. I don't think it's right to artificially lower highlights if it isn't true to reality. Cmao20 (talk) 15:38, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
    • Matter of taste I suppose. I miss some tiles. Let me think again before voting.--Jebulon (talk) 17:42, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Question heavy compression, 339 KB/MP and 51% of full resolution, likely cropped or downsized ? --Wilfredor (talk) 14:29, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
  • I am not sure why you are commenting this kind of thing on nearly every recent nomination on this page. The picture is probably cropped but I don't see why that is an issue. The file size seems roughly normal for an image of this resolution when compared to other FPs in the category and I cannot see any compression artefacts. Cmao20 (talk) 15:38, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
    Thank you for your question. For FP, it's not enough for an image to simply look good; technical quality is also part of the evaluation. Cropping an image isn't necessarily a problem, but if a file has been compressed or significantly reduced in size, it's fair to ask if a better version exists. This helps encourage uploading images at the highest possible quality. Wilfredor (talk) 16:09, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
  • Relying so heavily on file size as a metric does not seem to be a good way of evaluating technical quality. I see no actual issues. Cmao20 (talk) 16:27, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
    I agree with you that visible quality is the most important thing, without a doubt. However, we judge phone images quite strictly for technical limitations such as noise, processing and compression. For consistency, I think it's also fair to ask technical questions about files from high-end cameras, especially when the uploaded image is well below the camera's native resolution. My question is simply if there is a better version. Wilfredor (talk) 16:45, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Thank you very much, Cmao20, for the nomination. The picture is 6000 pixels large, and not heavily compressed. Weight is 7,62 Mb. -- Basile Morin (talk) 16:14, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
    Thanks, Basile. Your values ​​are correct; the file is approximately 6000 pixels wide and 7.62 MB. My question arose from comparing it to the native resolution of the EOS R5: 6001 × 3840 represents approximately 51% (half) of the camera's total 45 MP resolution, which isn't necessarily a problem. I agree that the file size alone doesn't indicate harmful compression if no artifacts are visible. My only remaining question was whether a higher-resolution version exists. Wilfredor (talk) 16:26, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
8192 pixels => 6001 pixels is a decent crop, in my opinion. The current best Canon camera available on the market (EOS-1D X Mark III) has a maximum of 5472 pixels. The larger resolution of this one offers freedom to choose a convenient framing afterwards. Yes, I decided to focus the composition on the castle. -- Basile Morin (talk) 18:09, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
 Support Thank you Basile, after checking the numbers again, 7.62 MB for 23 MP can be consistent with a high-quality JPEG export so I withdraw the concern about heavy compression. My original question was based on calculs, but I see no clear evidence of harmful compression here Wilfredor (talk) 18:48, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 23:57, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support — ERcheck (talk). 01:15, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 06:27, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:34, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Because of the blown highlight on the roof, disturbing even in the water reflection.--Jebulon (talk) 09:58, 26 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 07:59, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Looks OK for me Юрий Д.К. 09:46, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Excellent view of the château, and I agree with Cmao20’s assessment of the highlights. Maybe the white balance could be fine-tuned – on my calibrated screen the image looks a tiny little bit purplish. – Aristeas (talk) 19:46, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:38, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Ermell (talk) 07:37, 29 May 2026 (UTC)

File:20260317 Hohenbergia stellata.jpg

Voting period ends on 2 Jun 2026 at 11:27:02 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Hohenbergia stellata in the Botanical Garden Munich, Germany
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Plants#Order_:_Poales
  •  Info created, uploaded and nominated by FlocciNivis -- FlocciNivis (talk) 11:27, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support -- FlocciNivis (talk) 11:27, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Neutral Hash contrast because the flash and 8.5 MP vs 24.3 MP native for NIKON D750 (35% of full resolution --Wilfredor (talk) 12:10, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
    The image is a vertical crop from a horizontal original, containing no additional parts of the plant, but only surroundings. I cut out the rest because I found it uninteresting in editing -- FlocciNivis (talk) 09:48, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
    I understand. My recommendation is to find a better composition and take the photo at a time with better light to avoid post-editing. Wilfredor (talk) 12:32, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
    For me the high contrast works very well on this image and I don't think 8.5MP is bad for a macro shot -- FlocciNivis (talk) 15:11, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:42, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Oppose The flash makes the image unappealing in my eyes – Julian Lupyan (talk) 17:26, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:31, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 13:48, 25 May 2026 (UTC)

File:Wrocław – wieczorny widok na centrum miasta i najbliższe szczyty.jpg

Voting period ends on 1 Jun 2026 at 22:11:20 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Wrocław – evening view of the city center and the nearest peaks
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Poland
  •  Info created by Krigore – uploaded by Krigore – nominated by Krigore -- Krigore (talk) 22:11, 23 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support -- Krigore (talk) 22:11, 23 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Heavy JPEG compression, 281 KB/MP and exif missing --Wilfredor (talk) 12:23, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
    Unfortunately, this is an older photo and the EXIF ​​data is missing. I might have the source material on one of the older drives in the basement; I'll look for it when I can. The photos were taken with a Canon EOS 600D; I composed the panorama from several shots taken with an 18-55 mm lens at its maximum focal length. Krigore (talk) 16:40, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
I added the camera information bassed on your comment. --Wilfredor (talk) 17:19, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
Thank you! Krigore (talk) 17:28, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Nice cityscape, with the contrast between the silhouetted highrise buildings and the mountain on thje left Cmao20 (talk) 15:40, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
    Thank you! Krigore (talk) 16:41, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 23:57, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 07:13, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Юрий Д.К. 09:43, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Weak support A bit soft, but very impressive. I guess this would be an excellent example for the people who advocate that FPC has become too much about pixel peeping and should recall the crucial role of the wow. Yours truly prefers to consider both perspectives, so my result is a weak support. – Aristeas (talk) 19:42, 28 May 2026 (UTC)

File:Toujane paysage.jpg

Voting period ends on 1 Jun 2026 at 21:13:56 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:A faut esperer q'eu se jeu la finira bentot LCCN2004676889-restored.jpg

Voting period ends on 1 Jun 2026 at 18:52:01 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Famous political cartoon from the time of the French Revolution (circa 1789). It is a satirical representation of the division and extreme social inequality that existed under the Ancien Régime, structured into the so-called Three Estate
Done, I did from restored tiff file, look if is enough --Ezarateesteban 22:49, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Striking historic cartoon/caricature, very good reproduction. – Aristeas (talk) 19:31, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:30, 28 May 2026 (UTC)

File:20220615 Anoecia corni.jpg

Voting period ends on 1 Jun 2026 at 13:56:50 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Ants with Common dogwood-grass aphids in the nature reserve Südliche Fröttmaninger Heide in Munich, Germany

File:Црква „Св. Димитриј“ - Иловица 10.jpg

Voting period ends on 31 May 2026 at 23:35:40 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A stone statue of an angel above the entrance gate of St. Demetrius Church's yard in the village of Ilovica
  • @Kiril Simeonovski Да напрам Алтернативе ? --Mile (talk) 13:41, 26 May 2026 (UTC)
    @PetarM: Предложив алтернатива. Слободно уредувај ја ако мислиш дека треба. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 14:36, 26 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Nice, and I prefer the colour version because of the delicate shades. One may call this little figurine kitsch, but that does not change the photographer’s duties: if photographing kitsch, we need to make the kitsch shine, and this is what this photo does with much success. – Aristeas (talk) 19:28, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:27, 28 May 2026 (UTC)

Alternative

A stone statue of an angel above the entrance gate of St. Demetrius Church's yard in the village of Ilovica
  •  Comment This is an alternative black-and-white version as suggested by Petar. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 14:36, 26 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Mene poubo. --Mile (talk) 18:11, 26 May 2026 (UTC)

File:20260513 Alexandra Căpitănescu Z09 7315.jpg

Voting period ends on 30 May 2026 at 18:02:15 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Alexandra Căpitănescu in the second semi final of the Eurovision Song Contest 2026 in Vienna
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Work#Musicians with Instruments
  •  Info created by Granada – uploaded by Granada – nominated by Granada -- Granada (talk) 18:02, 21 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support Alexandra Căpitănescu at the beginning of her performance in the second semi final of the Eurovision Song Contest 2026 in Vienna. The white LED strips looked great together with their amount of movement. -- Granada (talk) 18:02, 21 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Comment - Fantastic image at thumb, but seems OOF. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 18:24, 21 May 2026 (UTC)
    This was shot at 300mm and f/2.8 from around 15m from the stage. She (Alexandra to the left) is the main subject and in focus, the other two are playing their guitars around 1,5m away from her and further away from the photographers, so they cannot be in focus. --Granada (talk) 18:30, 21 May 2026 (UTC)
    Yes, I did look at the metadata before commenting and realized that Alexandra was the main subject. Looking at it, I'd say focus is about 10 cm off of her, which the long lens and the wide aperture has turned into a near-miss. The shoulder pads and far end of the costume are much sharper than her face and the microphone (though some of that looks like a sharpening artefact).  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 19:04, 21 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Neutral Amazing wow factor, but lack of DoF. I understand that it is difficult to take a picture from far away and in the dark. f/2.8 was too shallow, or the focus was missed due to movement in the darkness. In these conditions, noise would have been acceptable, but a richer depth of field would have worked better. --Wilfredor (talk) 20:40, 21 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Comment Thank you two for your comments, that was also my concern when nominating this image. I will not withdraw this nomination prematurely but wait for other opinions. To me the wow-factor weighs higher than the shallow DoF and nobody would notice it when printing the photo in DIN A4. --Granada (talk) 08:22, 22 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Weak support per Fredo. I think some selective sharpening would help here, though. JayCubby (talk) 14:36, 22 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Post-withdrawal support for the "wowing" composition. ★ 17:26, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support The flaws aren't very noticeable, especially considering it's an action shot LetmeEditit (talk) 16:51, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Weak support per LetmeEditit, considering how difficult such shots are. – Aristeas (talk) 19:23, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
  •  Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 10:36, 29 May 2026 (UTC)

File:Arc en Ciel Plage de Radès.jpg

Voting period ends on 30 May 2026 at 08:21:06 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Category:Commons-yue#特色靚相候選
Category:Commons-yue